@crsluggo I think you are right about those carriers being Russian. If I were in their shoes, I’d reuse sculpts as well. They already have them, no need to re-invent the wheel.
-M_R
WAR ROOM - New Larry Harris Game
-
Thanks Hoffman and look forward to hearing any more news, YG.
-
I don’t know if anyone else has noticed but the website now has a basic gameplay turn sequence on it with more photos. It’s cool to see how much units cost; not in terms of money but in terms of resources, namely Oil, Steel and Other Strategic Resources (OSR). Looks like you bid Oil to see who goes first, then players move their units simultaneously… Battles ensue and you can choose either an Offensive or Defensive posturing for your units. Air battles are resolved first, then land battles. Looks like units can be retreated or withdrawn for Repair - except for attacking (or Offensive) Infantry. There’s loads to look at on there and I am personally stoked!! Â :lol:
-
Thanks for sharing Lozmoid. Sounds very interesting. I look forward to hearing more from YG after the tournament.
-
@Young:
Larry Harris and Thomas Gale will be at Young Grasshopper’s G40 Axis & Allies tournament in Oshawa Ontario Canada September 23, 24th… they will host a demonstration of their new game “The WAR ROOM” which will be streamed live on my YouTube channel.
More news and announcements to come, in the meantime… myself and the Cliffside team are very tiered right now… time to rest.
You are in the big time now YG. Nice work.
-
Yeah check out the images on the Nightingale Games site! Man this game looks cool - do I see rail lines? What the deal with those dice? WOW!
-
Having played this game with Larry in his Basement in April, I will say, I am very excited for it’s final release.
Is it different than A&A? yes.
Could the epic map be converted into an A&A game? YES:) and It’s a big “movement” from the typical maps and distances we are used to, which is a cool thing.
One of the best components of the game. The fact that all moves are done in the blind. It’s kind of like that scenario everyone’s talked about for years, where you setup 3 rooms, 3 boards, and only the referee’s can see what both forces are up to.
If you can imagine an actual war room, with the “wooden blocks” that’s the ultimate goal of what this game plans to be.
-
Sounds good. Hope it’s all of that.
-
They just sent out a rulebook draft in the newsletter today.
-
They just sent out a rulebook draft in the newsletter today.
Awesome. Is it okay for someone to post the rules here please? I cannot access them from work, gets blocked… (I know, I should be working but what the hell lol)
Thank you very much :)
-
I didn’t get blocked when I pasted the link below into my browser address box. Try pasting it in the same way and see if that works.
-
@CWO:
I didn’t get blocked when I pasted the link below into my browser address box. Try pasting it in the same way and see if that works.
Thanks but nope, still blocked. Do NG have their own website with a link to WR or do they only have like a facebook page? Many thanks
-
Announcement of Larry Harris Jr and Nightingale games demostration of WAR ROOM at T6GCON and Grasshopper’s G40 Invitational.
-
Congratulations YG on the upcoming participation of Larry and Nightingale Games at these events for a demo of their forthcoming game. This is great news indeed. Looking forward to seeing the after-event report that you’ll prepare (if you’re planning to do so) for your Youtube channel.
-
@CWO:
Congratulations YG on the upcoming participation of Larry and Nightingale Games at these events for a demo of their forthcoming game. This is great news indeed. Looking forward to seeing the after-event report that you’ll prepare (if you’re planning to do so) for your Youtube channel.
There will be live streaming on YouTube during the event :)
-
Well some problems with the design:
-
When you roll dice each unit rolls one die and the color of the spots indicate which unit is destroyed ( obviously the icon for infantry is more prevalent than say fighter) The problem here is your not representing the true power of your units. You cant even calculate the combat odds unless you convert the number of occurrences from the dice and convert into fractions, but how do you account for situations where you got like 4 tanks and 2 fighters, vs. 8 infantry? The dice have far fewer chances to roll a tank or fighter hit, so chances are the 8 infantry get wiped out and perhaps just one loss to the tank force. Or perhaps this is just the opposite of memorizing attack factor and defense factor, putting this all on a 12 sided die? But then again we lose DIFFERENT VALUES FOR ATTACK OR DEFENSE. They are all the same because you always roll the same dice ( no different dice for attack and defense). So you number crunchers will have less fun.
-
All the units have the same icon ( generic infantry, generic battleship) That sucks is is a huge part of what makes AA fun. its like he went backward to the milton bradley days with generic sculpts.
-
French West Africa and Madagascar are both German control, meaning they get the value of these areas and can move in freely. What a farcical idea! These are Vichy and it is true the Germans had limited interaction, but could have never entered these areas or derived any benefit. They should be neutral.
-
AA players like to notate the land areas with three letters (e.g. Italy= Itl) for whatever reason all the land areas have a number and why? I understand the sea areas like Atlantic ocean could be notated A-15, but land areas should be known with the same abbreviations as we see in online games ( Ukraine=UKR etc), not S15 or whatever.
-
I mentioned before they need to go with Historical army designations like American 3rd army, British 8th army… not Italian army 189… it makes no sense whatsoever.
-
They kinda borrowed the idea of territory cards from Monopoly and risk, where they have info and you take a physical card .
Not really liking this concept. They went away from AA too far in order to get as far as possible from those designs. Im thinking this is really the design of another, but they brought in Larry to bring interest in the project. It does not seem like a Larry Harris design, but rather the design of a younger man who made Euro games. IMO
-
-
Fair point IL, well noted. I must say that I think Artillery should be red and Armour yellow, not the other way around. Say, do you happen to have a copy of the current rulebook that you could post here please? I’m intrigued by the combat system and want to explore your thoughts on the matter but cannot until I’ve seen the rules. Cheers!
-
@Imperious:
Well some problems with the design:
- When you roll dice each unit rolls one die and the color of the spots indicate which unit is destroyed ( obviously the icon for infantry is more prevalent than say fighter) The problem here is your not representing the true power of your units. You cant even calculate the combat odds unless you convert the number of occurrences from the dice and convert into fractions, but how do you account for situations where you got like 4 tanks and 2 fighters, vs. 8 infantry? The dice have far fewer chances to roll a tank or fighter hit, so chances are the 8 infantry get wiped out and perhaps just one loss to the tank force. Or perhaps this is just the opposite of memorizing attack factor and defense factor, putting this all on a 12 sided die? But then again we lose DIFFERENT VALUES FOR ATTACK OR DEFENSE. They are all the same because you always roll the same dice ( no different dice for attack and defense). So you number crunchers will have less fun.
Just a two corrections:
It’s not one die per unit, the units roll a different amount of dice.And sure you can count combat odds, it’s just not as simple anymore. But since there is only one round of combat anyway, you can still count the odds of units you hit and which of yours are hit easily enough.
Example
4 tanks and 2 fighters, vs. 8 infantry (simplifying by assuming max. dice stance, leaving out air supremacy and white side of the dice)
20 dice at 1/3 hit to an inf vs. 16 dice at 1/6 hit to a ftr or tank
-> 6 + 2/3 hits vs. 2 + 4/6 hits
You’d better put the inf in defensive (more hitpoints) stance and generally have some heavy hitters with you at all timesAnd lastly, true, there is no difference between attack and defense, but now you’ve got different stances.
Is this A&A? no!
Do I like it? Well … Arm and ftr do cost double the resources and more costly ones, taking the trade value into account, it’s 16 OSR vs. 42,7 OSR, but still, I’m not sure if I like the idea of 4 tanks and 2 fighters steamrolling 8 infs.Lozmoid, the ruleboook can be found here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bwgi0yhRF9rJeDZtaThTSm9iZ1E/view?ct=t(WAR_ROOM_Bulletin_37_20_2017
Edit:
And this might be a bit early,
but as infantry don’t soak up hits anymore and even worse get shot quickly, why would I bring more than one to negate Force advantage? Chances are quite good that for every hit they take, they also dish out one, even to a more valuable unit, but not having more than one present will negate a lot of enemy hits. So the bang for the buck, taking survivability into account, seems rather low.
I guess they are what you spend your OSR on, which you can’t use for quality units because of lack of oil or iron. -
Rules look pretty good, many of the things people have discussed for years, moving away from D6, fog of war, trade, more complex economics, its all in there.
At least from my point of view, the rules and ideas seem pretty similar to AxA, but reducing the flavor and role of combat a little in order to add that complexity back in the non-battle parts of the game.
Writing in your orders seems very similar to Pandemic’s expansion, it seems like a good way to implement fog of war, but I personally don’t think this method is very fun from a playability point of view. It requires a lot of abstraction and prediction, its much more realistic, definitely looks like this part of the record-keeping and planning is at the heart of the game (more so than combat…)
I would have picked a different name than OSR, some other abstraction like Coal/Food/Cash are very familiar to gamers, but just calling a game resource OSR feels like not picking a name or committing to one abstraction or another…“I’ll be sure to win this game when I reach my OSR/Payback Ratio Threshold”
There is a ton of information on the board, the stacks required are printed right on there. Since you only need this information once, I wonder if there is another way to set the game up without having that information remain as visual clutter on the board itself?
Hope its lots of fun, ready to hear more feedback/comments
-
Writing in your orders seems very similar to Pandemic’s expansion, it seems like a good way to implement fog of war,
The secret orders part also sounds a bit like the classic WWI board game Diplomacy, in which players write secret orders using territorial identification codes to say which of their units take what action in which direction.
-
Just found out about this game today. Super excited to see how it looks in the Kickstarter!
Is there an estimation on how long a game is supposed to take? Should I be expecting Global 1940 levels?
Suggested Topics
