@Panther Sure, it is just the only standard A&A Edition I’m aware of, that features opposing forces in the same territory at setup.
Sino-Sovjet Pact - darn, that’s WarRoom. Sovjet-Mongolian Defense Pact from the Global40 rules is what I meant
thanks for answering
It says so in the setup, just seems a bit weird, as well as the Japanese sub together with the US fleet starting in the same sea zone.
Another question, does the Sino-Sovjet Pact still apply or are Japan and Russia at War. The rules state
“ALL Powers begin the game AT WAR. Both the Soviet Union and the US may attack anyone from the onset of the game.”
which doesn’t sepcifically adress this, but it reads like no penalty for attacking JAP/USSR
Hi,
I’ve got two questions
Is Celebes really still British or is that a typo?
And will this setup also work for Europe/Pacific alone?
It sounds like the Europe side leans very much towards the Allies, whereas Japan is favored in the Pacific-
The starting ressources are as follows
Oil -
Iron 2
OSR 6
Oil 6
Iron 12
OSR 19
EF
Oil 4
Iron 8
OSR 13
Oil 3
Iron 4
OSR 6
Oil 7
Iron 10
OSR 16
Oil 5
Iron 8
OSR 14
Eu
Oil 5
Iron 6
OSR 9
P
Oil 2
Iron 4
OSR 6
Oil 8
Iron 13
OSR 18
Eu
Oil 5
Iron 8
OSR 11
P
Oil 6
Iron 9
OSR 13
Oil 6
Iron 6
OSR 11
even if this is desecrating a corpse
Anyone here still interested? https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=41848.0
Servus,
wir suchen noch ein, zwei Mitspieler fuer unsere Axis&Allies Runde in Muenchen (sind 33-36 Jahre alt). Gespielt wird meistens AA42.2 oder AAE40, selten auch mal WW1.
Termine sind Freitags oder Samstag (oder vor Feiertagen), je nachdem wann sich genug Spieler finden, was z.Z. leider nur so alle zwei Monate klappt.
Fuer A&A Miniatures koennten wir auch noch Mitspieler brauchen [Und ab Ende des Jahres dann fuer War Room].
Gruesse
Kilian
Can’t reply to the other 2.0 thread either
Name: Lydian
Location: Munich, Germany
Games: A&A, AAM
It’s not that easy, since units are assigned to command stacks and you will have more than just one commad stack in a given area, e.g. for movement purposes, since you can’t reorganize them in the moving phase. Also there is a limit of 8 units per command counter, so i.e. the Eastern Front will see multiple commad stacks battling each other.
So you’d need some measure of securely attaching the plastic units to the command counter and be able to move them without messing them up, maybe some sort of multiunit base with a command flag in the middle, replacing the counter.
Depending whom you play with, it’ll also lead to accusations as to which command stack the unit in the territory belongs/-ed to and such.
It’s going to be a hassle and need some custom components, but feel free to do it.
I didn’t even know you could back without an account.
Anyway, you can always ask the creators, they see who has backed and should be able to help you out.
I’ve owned AAA since the first print run, but is has seen considerably less table time than 42.2.
Italy and China I think are more of a nuisance to play than really fun, and without NO Italy isn’t going anywhere anyway. And this might be minor, but the IC in India in 42.2 makes for far more interesting play in the Pacific and KJF is actually not completely outmatched by KGF.
And out of interest
@calvinhobbesliker:
It seems that at least one scenario of AA50 is mostly balanced, and 1942 is heavily Axis-favored.
Which is that, 42 with NO? Because it can’t be any of the 41s, without NO Germany is dead, with NO there is no stopping Japan.