Organizer

@gen-manstein Oh yea that. NM

@tchenao Who the heck is “Don”?

@greyleaf3 unless you also ascribe to the notion that House Rules are necessary to include: Airborne, Fortifications, Light Carriers, etc than no.

@thrasher1 I got that game, not a fan. It needs to be just like AA…but in SPACE

@thrasher1 Which ever direction the project takes, the warships need to be : Mothership /Deadnought, Battleship, Battlecruiser, Carrier, Light Carrier, Heavy Cruiser, Destroyer, Submarine?, Transport, Fighter, Bomber

@thrasher1 Well the mental aptitude on the architecture of the spaces saves alot of time. I can balance the game really well if alot of the homework is done already. 1942.2 has a better layout than probably every AA game. I didn’t used to think that, but over time yes.

The sea zones would be empty space, and every land area a star system, and i would consult actual star systems using England as “Sol” system

@midnight_reaper I prefer a space game of alien empires. I was even looking at making and plotting star systems in such a way that exactly mirrored 1942.2 space by space. Then getting some guy to 3D small scale ships. The game could have alot more technologies and even races with unique qualities ( like the Cylons). Of course this is with D12 dice so their is good differentiation of warship classes.

@eisenhower The Police have been called and will knock shortly. Enjoy your day sir!

@hbg-gw-enthusiast I like using the 1914 submarine piece for WW2 games…reasoning is they look like most toys that were made during the war, and these toys stand up. The worst by far were the Revised Sub Toys ( in every case). HBG does make great subs, They need to make a type XX1, that stands up good, and also the Japanese 1-300/500 types

@hbg-gw-enthusiast

TOYS