@sergio here is the lite version of AARHE 4.0
G40 Balance Mod - Rules and Download
-
I thought so, I down loaded the saved game at the end of the BM rules page 1.
That’s BM2. I think that’s your problem.
-
Yeah BM has been included in the TripleA maps for many months now. I thought you started a BM2 game with Garg on purpose.
-
uh, then where do I get BM3?
-
Not to be presumptuous, but why isn’t BM3 the download at the end of the BM rules?!!?!?
That’s quite misleading, IMO. :-P
-
Not to be presumptuous, but why isn’t BM3 the download at the end of the BM rules?!!?!?
That’s quite misleading, IMO. :-P
It’s included in TripleA!! All you need to do is update the G40 maps on TripleA and voila.
There’s no need to use a saved game anymore.
-
ah, ok. So I am a dummy it looks like!
:lol:
This is me slowly walking away, pretending that I didn’t do anything wrong…… :mrgreen:
-
I’ve pushed up that update to the Japanese objective. If you’re really bothered by the present wording, you can delete and re-download the map.
-
cool. whats the updated wording?
-
10 PUs if not yet at war with USA, has not yet attacked or taken control of French Indo-China, and has not declared war on UK or ANZAC.
It’s as discussed above isn’t it?
-
yah. i thought “occupied” by itself was sufficient, but its fine.
-
Only problem was if an ally moved troops in and then Japan attacked it unsuccessfully.
-
Good catch Simon! :)
-
aha! But it is impossible for Japan to attack allied troops unsuccessfully, without having already violated one of the other two conditions (i.e. it must be at war with USA, ANZAC, or UK). So its a moot point. Thats why “occupied” was sufficient. But whatevs. . .
In that case, u might as well change the objective’s language in Vanilla and every other Global iteration, cuz the language is the same in all of them.
-
aha! But it is impossible for Japan to attack allied troops unsuccessfully, without having already violated one of the other two conditions (i.e. it must be at war with USA, ANZAC, or UK). So its a moot point. Thats why “occupied” was sufficient. But whatevs. . .
Incorrect!
Japan can be at war with UK/ANZ and still collect from FIC, in the case of an unprovoked attack by UK/ANZ!So if UK/ANZ declares war on Japan and occupies FIC, then Japan could attack FIC and fail, and this should nullify the NO, even though it is not occupied by Japan and Japan is not at war with the USA
-
Aren’t we all just doing J1 these days anyway? :-D
-
no.
-
aha! But it is impossible for Japan to attack allied troops unsuccessfully, without having already violated one of the other two conditions (i.e. it must be at war with USA, ANZAC, or UK). So its a moot point. Thats why “occupied” was sufficient. But whatevs. . .
Incorrect!
Japan can be at war with UK/ANZ and still collect from FIC, in the case of an unprovoked attack by UK/ANZ!So if UK/ANZ declares war on Japan and occupies FIC, then Japan could attack FIC and fail, and this should nullify the NO, even though it is not occupied by Japan and Japan is not at war with the USA
touche. ::hat tip::
-
:-D Thanks
-
Is is legal for a US bomber to land in Amur, even though Russia is not at war with Japan but they are at war with Germany and Italy? The US is at war with Japan. Turn 5. The politics panel shows the US and Russia as allies. There is no distinction between what territories the allied forces can occupy in Russia. Europe map, pacific map? Or am I wrong?
-
No, Russia must be at war with Japan.
When Russia is not at war with Japan, Russian territories on the Pacific map are neutral
Suggested Topics
