sorry about the delay
Any Interest in a G40 tournament?
-
@Infrastructure:
I’m in, but what about a 2 out of 3 tourney? Playing the first 2 simultaneous?
let’s see what the interest is, spread the word.
-
bump
-
with all the activity here it might be tough to keep this on the top of the board? :|
-
better start a sticky thread JWW. you probably just missed the gargantua XDAP tourney. it started back in May and will hopefully be complete by November of this year… :-P
it’s been great fun… i’m sure there would be a lot of interest in another tournament, esp if there was a prize pool like the XDAP tourney.
-
I’d be interested.
I think two games at the same time would be do-able, where you play your opponent as both sides. 3rd game a s tie breaker. However, in the interest of keeping the tournament from taking half of a year, I would be okay with a one game win or lose game. Then I could blame luck if my strategy sucked. :-P
What about an agreed upon handicap across the board for everyone, to make the playing field level. The Allies get +X for everyone playing the Allies?
-
better start a sticky thread JWW. you probably just missed the gargantua XDAP tourney. it started back in May and will hopefully be complete by November of this year… :-P
it’s been great fun… i’m sure there would be a lot of interest in another tournament, esp if there was a prize pool like the XDAP tourney.
No I am in garg’s…we are just waiting for the next round…it’s going kinda slow for our team, that’s all.
FYI…I don’t have “sticky” powers
-
I’d be up for it. Sounds fun.
-
I think two games at the same time would be do-able, where you play your opponent as both sides. 3rd game a s tie breaker.
I’ll play. I like Whackamatt’s idea above.
-
Kinda torn on whether I’d have time to participate myself but I’m pretty confident you’d get at least 8 participants JWW, if not 16+.
-
i would probably be in
-
I was in the Tournament last year. I would be in for this one.
-
An idea that I like is a round-robin competition. Divide it into 6-man divisions, where each participant plays 5 games. Seed the divisions using Gamerman’s rankings.
Advantages would include
-everyone plays 5 games
-we’d see some close games that would provide good data
-winning a round robin against 5 other players would arguably be a better achievement than winning a tourney, because it would be harder to pull through via luck or dice.I guess the disadvantage is not everyone would want to play 5 games (4-5 person divisions instead to lighten the load?). And we’d have to decide if the games should count for the league or not.
-
I’d be in
-
teams or singles……either way im interested
-
I’d probably be in on something like this…
-
Count me in!
-
I think two games at the same time would be do-able, where you play your opponent as both sides. 3rd game a s tie breaker.
I’ll play. I like Whackamatt’s idea above.
edit: I also like the idea of 1 bid unit per territory
-
I might be in
-
i would suggest seeding by gamerman’s rankings





