They dont compare at all we play a lot of ALPHA+2 and its a great game. We also about once a month when we go for a second game we’ll do the older games A.A. Pacfic & Europe those games are awsome games that layed down the base fort the latter games. AsJapan can you get the 22$ ? what Island do you fail to take? how early do they start Bombing you? how many ones did the Allies roll on the opening round? They seem more do or die, oops I for got to say how well are you rolling? You have to do this or its all over or you have to do this to get that more cut throat. Less grand strategy there is no recovering from a bad round. there also quicker to play and there are less rules and situations
I love them both if I had to choose I would look at how much time I had and how many players are avalible
All nite and 4+ players ALPHA+ 2 or 3.5, less than 4 players and limited time any one of the older ones or even the ORIGINAL their all great in their own way
AAP40 FAQ
-
I’m afraid I have no idea what you’re talking about. The only dogfighting in the original Pacific occurred during SBRs.
-
I’m afraid I have no idea what you’re talking about. The only dogfighting in the original Pacific occurred during SBRs.
:lol:
-
I’m afraid I have no idea what you’re talking about. The only dogfighting in the original Pacific occurred during SBRs.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
-
can 1 fighter tie up 1 other fighter in a dogfight like in pacific(origanal)
For a minute there, I thought you were referring to the old CAP system, but when you mentioned ‘other fighter’, you kind of lost me.
-
ok heres the senario…. USA has 2fightrs, 2bb,and 2 dds japan has a fightr and 3 subs. can usa choose to use 1 fighter to tie up 1 jap figher in a 1v1 combat both hitting on 1? this is how i under stand it. (pardon my spelzing)
Nope. Not in this game. The only dogfights occur during strategic bomb raids.
-
I have a question about strategic bombing and scrambling to defend a sea zone.
Kreig, I have a question that came up in our last game and we were so stumped that we had to flip a coin to decide.If I’m attacking an island the has 5 fighters on an airbase, what happens if I send in an amphibious assault and strategically bomb the airfield at the same time? For example, I send in 2 fighters to escort the bomber on the raid and “x” number of transports and warships to assault that same island. 2 fighters scramble to defend vs the strategic bombing and 2 fighters scramble to defend the sea zone leaving one fighter to defend vs the land units. The dogfight kills no fighters on either side and the bomber does 3+ points of damage to the airbase, meaning no air units can scramble to defend the sea zone. What happens to the 2 fighters that were assigned to scramble to the sea zone now that the airbase is too damaged to let them do that? Do they do nothing that round since they were assigned to scramble before the bombing raid, or do they get to defend in the land battle (which also doesn’t seem right since dogfighting planes don’t get to do two things and that gives less incentive to scramble to defend the airfield since you have a safety net of “if the bombing is successful, at least I can still automatically fight in the actual island defence”)?
Thanks in advance
-
Well, the rulebook says scrambling occurs at the beginning of the conduct combat phase. Then SBR’s occur. So your scrambled aircraft left the undamaged airbase to arrive at the sea zone, and then the airbase got bombed. So it appears to me that the fighters are indeed scrambled, and the bombing of the airbase doesn’t prevent that, as it occurred at a later time.
-
Gamerman01 is correct.
-
Along those same lines if the scrambled fighters defeat the naval armada, would they be able to land on the damaged
airfields or would they crash? -
Along those same lines if the scrambled fighters defeat the naval armada, would they be able to land on the damaged
airfields or would they crash?Air units don’t require air bases to land; they can land on any territory they or an ally controls.
-
Yup.
-
Scrambling question:
Scramble: Defending fighters and tactical bombers (strategic
bombers cannot scramble) located on islands that have
operative airbases can be scrambled to defend against attacks
in the sea zones surrounding those islands.Is it considered an attack if you move through an unoccupied SZ that contains an enemy island w/air base enroute to attack another?
Say an American force wishes to sail past the Carolines, Fighters on the island but not enemy ships in the SZ, and attack Paulau? Could the Japanese Caroline fighters scramble and fight the American navy as it passes? Or is it not considered an attack in the SZ because its empty?
-
If you’re just passing through a sea zone, you’re not making an attack in it. Scrambling is done after all combat moves are completed.
-
The Alaska sea zone 1 is blocked from sea zone 2. The space between the Aluetian islands force you to make an extra movement. Is this just an error in the way it was drawn. If you are on the far west end of sea zone 1, can you move one space to sea zone 2. If you can that would mean you are traveling between islands and are traveling along the territory line, kind of crossing it.
-
Sea zones 1 and 2 are adjacent to each other. Movement between them is passing between Alaska and Aleutian Islands.
-
Questions:
Where is it written in the rules that a transport must move with an escorting boat?Would that not contradict the un-escorted transport being shot at by subs?
AC
-
Questions:
Where is it written in the rules that a transport must move with an escorting boat?Would that not contradict the un-escorted transport being shot at by subs?
AC
Transports do not have to be escorted. Yes, that’s why there’s a rule about subs being able to fire on transports unescorted by surface warships.
-
Kreighund, a China rule question.
AAP40 Rule page 9
“Kwangtung and Burma are special
cases. While they are not Chinese
territories and cannot be controlled
by China, Chinese forces can attack
Axis units there and occupy them, but
the IPCs generated go to the United
Kingdom (unless India is under Axis
control). These are the only non-
Chinese territories that Chinese units
can occupy.”The “…IPCs generated go to the United Kingdom (unless India is under Axis control).” part is my question.
**Q:**May China get receive the IPC’s from Kwangtung and/or Burma if India has fallen?
(It does not say China may get the IPCs, only that IPCs go to the UK. Nor does it state that China does not receive IPCs either(If India is under Axis control). -
Kreighund, a China rule question.
AAP40 Rule page 9
“Kwangtung and Burma are special
cases. While they are not Chinese
territories and cannot be controlled
by China, Chinese forces can attack
Axis units there and occupy them, but
the IPCs generated go to the United
Kingdom (unless India is under Axis
control). These are the only non-
Chinese territories that Chinese units
can occupy.”The “…IPCs generated go to the United Kingdom (unless India is under Axis control).” part is my question.
**Q:**May China get receive the IPC’s from Kwangtung and/or Burma if India has fallen?
(It does not say China may get the IPCs, only that IPCs go to the UK. Nor does it state that China does not receive IPCs either(If India is under Axis control).I think China gets the ipc’s, but it can’t build there or destroy a factory there
-
Calvinhobbesliker is correct. China can control these territories if it captures them while India is under Axis control, but they are not “Chinese territories”.
Suggested Topics
