Yeah, Italy go ahead and move the german ships
Global 1940 Wittman and Private Panic vs Credulous and Elrood
-
See my PM Seb
-
TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 3.9
Game History
Round: 14
Purchase Units - British
British buy 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 3 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Purchase Units - UK_Pacific
UK_Pacific buy 1 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Combat Move - British
4 fighters, 3 infantry, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Persia to Iraq
1 infantry moved from Normandy Bordeaux to Southern France
British take Southern France from GermansCombat - British
Battle in Iraq
British attack with 4 fighters, 3 infantry, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber
Germans defend with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour, 1 infantry and 3 mech_infantrys
British win, taking Iraq from Germans with 4 fighters, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 16
Casualties for Germans: 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 3 mech_infantrys
Casualties for British: 3 infantryNon Combat Move - British
4 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Iraq to Persia
3 mech_infantrys moved from West India to India
2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from United Kingdom to 110 Sea Zone
2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from 110 Sea Zone to Normandy BordeauxPlace Units - British
1 artillery and 2 infantry placed in Persia
British undo move 1.
1 fighter and 2 infantry placed in United Kingdom
2 artilleries and 1 infantry placed in PersiaTurn Complete - British
Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 4
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 80 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,3,2,2,2,5,3,6,5,6
British collect 20 PUs (4 lost to blockades); end with 20 PUs total
Trigger British 3 No Enemy Submarines: British met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 23 PUs
Objective British 4 Control Convoy Lanes: British met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 26 PUsPlace Units - UK_Pacific
1 infantry placed in IndiaTurn Complete - UK_Pacific
Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 2
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 39 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,5
UK_Pacific collect 3 PUs (2 lost to blockades); end with 3 PUs total
Some Units in India change ownership: 1 infantry
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by Americans from 31 Sea Zone: 1 carrier
EDIT: Adding units owned by Americans to 26 Sea Zone: 1 carrier
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by British from Persia: 4 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber
EDIT: Adding units owned by British to India: 4 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by British from India: 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber
EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Persia: 1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode -
Edites 2 planes back to Persia! :roll:
-
TripleA Manual Gamesave Post for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition, version: 3.9
Game History
Round: 14
Purchase Units - British
British buy 2 artilleries, 1 fighter and 3 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Purchase Units - UK_Pacific
UK_Pacific buy 1 infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs;Combat Move - British
4 fighters, 3 infantry, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Persia to Iraq
1 infantry moved from Normandy Bordeaux to Southern France
British take Southern France from GermansCombat - British
Battle in Iraq
British attack with 4 fighters, 3 infantry, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber
Germans defend with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 factory_minor, 1 harbour, 1 infantry and 3 mech_infantrys
British win, taking Iraq from Germans with 4 fighters, 3 mech_infantrys and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 16
Casualties for Germans: 1 armour, 1 artillery, 1 infantry and 3 mech_infantrys
Casualties for British: 3 infantryNon Combat Move - British
4 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Iraq to Persia
3 mech_infantrys moved from West India to India
2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from United Kingdom to 110 Sea Zone
2 artilleries and 2 infantry moved from 110 Sea Zone to Normandy BordeauxPlace Units - British
1 artillery and 2 infantry placed in Persia
British undo move 1.
1 fighter and 2 infantry placed in United Kingdom
2 artilleries and 1 infantry placed in PersiaTurn Complete - British
Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 4
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 80 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,3,2,2,2,5,3,6,5,6
British collect 20 PUs (4 lost to blockades); end with 20 PUs total
Trigger British 3 No Enemy Submarines: British met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 23 PUs
Objective British 4 Control Convoy Lanes: British met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 26 PUsPlace Units - UK_Pacific
1 infantry placed in IndiaTurn Complete - UK_Pacific
Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 2
Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 39 Sea Zone. Rolls: 2,5
UK_Pacific collect 3 PUs (2 lost to blockades); end with 3 PUs total
Some Units in India change ownership: 1 infantry
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by Americans from 31 Sea Zone: 1 carrier
EDIT: Adding units owned by Americans to 26 Sea Zone: 1 carrier
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
Turning on Edit Mode
EDIT: Removing units owned by British from Persia: 2 fighters
EDIT: Adding units owned by British to India: 2 fighters
EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode -
I think now we have it :-P
-
Thanks Seb.
Mark - you can ignore my request for an edit a few posts back.
-
Allies squander resources in how they defeat the Axis-Powers. Who should take Berlin? US? Russians? Or do we let the French take their revenge?? :mrgreen:
-
Italy? Time they switched sides. :-D
-
You mean Cred has not been on your side all along? Could have fooled this slant eyed Nip.
-
He does seem happy for to be sunning ourselves in West Germany. Thanks for the hospitality Cred! :wink:
-
I’m on the side of entertainment. Win or lose I can at least say I made the game distinctive….
Reckon its time for Adam and I to take on the seasoned players next.
Cred
-
Also do you guys fancy a play by email game of Civilisation IV? Thought today that if you love Axis and Allies you’d probably go weak at the knees for Civilisation….
-
I’m on the side of entertainment. Win or lose I can at least say I made the game distinctive….
Reckon its time for Adam and I to take on the seasoned players next.
Cred
Eh? Are you surrendering?
Happy to partner you Cred. Although victory would be sweeter than interesting! El-rude and witt (with a small w) may prefer a more equal game than the two veteran has-been vs the two young bloods?
-
Also do you guys fancy a play by email game of Civilisation IV? Thought today that if you love Axis and Allies you’d probably go weak at the knees for Civilisation….
I’ll play if everyone wants to so as not to break up our little cadre. I do have quite a few A&A games on though.
-
No not surrendering yet - I think you guys need to place your flags on the Riechstag first. Just planning ahead for the inevitable. Are you familiar with Civilisation then Adam? If not I’d look it up - suspect would be massively up your street. Why play for 6 years of human existence when you can play 6000?!!!
-
civilization is da bomb!!
-
What exactly are you talking about? I have Civ IV on my PC, but its a normal PC Game… which I sometimes enjoyed singleplay…
Or is there another online / web version I dont know about?
What I enjoy regularly though is a board game that made it to the webs called: “Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization” - it was strongly influenced by the Sid Meiers Civ game. But is different. Sometimes referred to as “Civilization Light”
If you look at the Strategy-Game ranking on Boardgamegeek you find it on top 2:
https://boardgamegeek.com/strategygames/browse/boardgame?sort=rank&rankobjecttype=family&rankobjectid=5497&rank=2#2Rank 6 is its predecessor, which is 90% the same (similar relationship like A&A 1940 1st to 2nd Edition).
This is the online version: http://www.boardgaming-online.com/
:wink:
-
My Civ experience is limited to an early internet play enabled version called Civnet, which I played solo for some years.
Happy to try whatever version you knowledgeable guys decide. But no Civ s/w here.
Back to business! Where is Italy’s go? Another step on the road to defeat!
-
What exactly are you talking about? I have Civ IV on my PC, but its a normal PC Game… which I sometimes enjoyed singleplay…
Or is there another online / web version I dont know about?
What I enjoy regularly though is a board game that made it to the webs called: “Through the Ages: A Story of Civilization” - it was strongly influenced by the Sid Meiers Civ game. But is different. Sometimes referred to as “Civilization Light”
If you look at the Strategy-Game ranking on Boardgamegeek you find it on top 2:
https://boardgamegeek.com/strategygames/browse/boardgame?sort=rank&rankobjecttype=family&rankobjectid=5497&rank=2#2Rank 6 is its predecessor, which is 90% the same (similar relationship like A&A 1940 1st to 2nd Edition).
This is the online version: http://www.boardgaming-online.com/
:wink:
Hi Elrood - yes aware of that game and its been on my purchase target list for a while. Good to see the sequel is now up to number 2. Which is the better game in your estimation as I think both versions are available at the moment?
I am just talking about the regular version of Civ 4 and I thought Civ 4 had online multiplayer including play by email capability - but maybe I got that wrong. If it doesn’t have play by email then it damn well should do based on the nature of the game!
On Italy’s go I’m down in London tonight so will be tomorrow at earliest I’m afraid.
Cred
-
Hi Elrood - yes aware of that game and its been on my purchase target list for a while. Good to see the sequel is now up to number 2. Which is the better game in your estimation as I think both versions are available at the moment?
I am just talking about the regular version of Civ 4 and I thought Civ 4 had online multiplayer including play by email capability - but maybe I got that wrong. If it doesn’t have play by email then it damn well should do based on the nature of the game!
On Italy’s go I’m down in London tonight so will be tomorrow at earliest I’m afraid.
Cred
Yes I prefer the 2nd Edition! I own 1st edition as boardgame and have played about 3 games with my friends… but i played about 160 games of it on that online platform from above.
2nd edition came out recently and I have finish about 20 games of it … also online. I see no point in getting the card board version… i simply cannot find the time and people to play such time consuming game (similar to A&A… which I only play via tripleA for years now… a bit of a shame… since I own both 1st and 2nd editon… latter one I never played once… :| )
At TtA… 1st edition is perfect… and 2nd edition just straightened out few things… and made it another kind of perfect… I say. Its really amazing how these games were developed and how good they are. swoon