@Combat:
look at Websites that print vinyl banners. You can get them as low as $50. I printed my map using cheapbanners.com
Thanks… I’ll check it out.
HBG sculpts for U.S. set
-
How about the flying tiger for the Chinese fighter? If this has been brought up I apologize.
The list shows a P-40 for a early war fighter and they were used by the Flying Tigers.
-
I would like to put in a request for a landing craft as well. The LCM 3 to be exact. I think the D-Day landing craft is a piece that needs to be made and I’m surprised that neither your or FMG has announced an intention to do so. Please make the landing craft!
-
I have to say I like the landing craft idea too. The Table Tactics one never did it for me…
-
+1 for the LCM idea, however much smaller than the Table Tactics version…
-
Yes exactly.
-
Gents, I would eventually like to have all three, LST, LCM and LVCP. Think of the invasion only Game like D-Day, it could be modified where all Overlord forces must arrive via landing craft. Think what German Panthers and 88mms could do to a landing force in that game if all Allied forces are transported to the beaches via landing craft.
LST transports 3 units per craft
LCM transports 2 units per craft
LVCP transports 1 unit per craft
Landing craft have a defense factor of 1 or 0?
Embarked units are lost if the landing craft is sunk.
Embarked units have a 0 defense factor
If this is the wrong place for this suggestion please let me know.
V/R -
its way too much… just one unit LST.
-
are you still planing on making both china sets?
-
HBG is making an LVT in the US Marines set. Isn’t that a type of landing craft?
I’m a little unfamiliar with the landing craft terms. What are LST, LCM and LVCP? Is one of those also called a “Higgens Boat”? If so, which one and what are the other two? -
I would really like to see a landing craft and a PT boat. PLEASE, don’t make me make them!
-
For those who want to know here is the USN type of Landing craft. This will clear up the acronym use by us retired Military types for everyone else.
LSD- Dock Landing Ship
LST-Tank Landing Ship
LCM- Mechanized Landing Craft
LCVP-Vehicle Personnel Landing Craft
LSM- Medium Landing Ship
LCPL-Large Personnel Landing Craft
LSM®-Medium Landing Ship Rocket
LCU-Utility Landing Craft
LPD-Amphibious Transport Dock
Higgins Boat requires more research, more to come. Cheers -
are you still planing on making both china sets?
The plans are to make them, but we will see how sales go, I have not taken any money and I am working on my third mould. (Very Expensive)
Axis Minor set is projected for me to have pieces for sale on Aug 5. -
Great news HBG we are looking forward to them.
-
@coachofmany:
FMG is doing the Helldiver.
I believe FMG was going to mold the F6F Hellcat. Not the same as the SB2C Helldiver, which was the replacement for the SBD Dauntless. As Jeremy wrote above, they intend to mold the TBF Avenger.
-
If I may make a humble request, I’d like to see an A-26 Invader sculpt for a tactical bomber. If possible, I would like the fixed nose versions bristling with machine guns!
-
@C_Strabala:
If I may make a humble request, I’d like to see an A-26 Invader sculpt for a tactical bomber. If possible, I would like the fixed nose versions bristling with machine guns!
Personally, I’d love to see that too. It’s a different style than the dive bomber (dauntless) and the torp bomber (avenger). Skip Bombing campaign!
don’t think the molding of guns would fly in scale of this size. especially since the molds all seem to be top/bottom release, so at best you could get 2 muzzles along the center line of the nose, and that would look…. wrong.
-
Good point about the mouldings. I didn’t consider the fact that the scale would not lend itself well to gun muzzles.
-
I also think that visually the A-26 is a smart choice for a Tac Bomber.
-
An idea I read in earlier posts would be good. Split the tac bomber category up. Have medium bombers and dive/torpedo bombers. If we could get all countries to have a 4 engine bomber, a 2 engine bomber and a single engine bomber you would have heavy, medium and tac(dive/torpedo). This will be good for people that use techs. Also if players playing Germany or japan want to perdue heavy bombers they would have a pieces that look like a heavy! Just sayin!
-
An idea I read in earlier posts would be good. Split the tac bomber category up. Have medium bombers and dive/torpedo bombers. If we could get all countries to have a 4 engine bomber, a 2 engine bomber and a single engine bomber you would have heavy, medium and tac(dive/torpedo). This will be good for people that use techs. Also if players playing Germany or japan want to perdue heavy bombers they would have a pieces that look like a heavy! Just sayin!
The B-25 that I am making for the US set will be the same size as the Bombers in OOB German and Japan bombers. This will become the Med. Bomber for the game since they are 2 engine. All 4 engine will be heavy and torpedo/dive will be Tacs.
Of course you can use them how you want, but my thinking is in line with Tigerman77.
Now that I think about it he might of swayed me to go this route.
Suggested Topics
