• @cyanight:

    One of my nastier moves when things are going well in the pac is to stack up a NG SZ and put down a seabase, this creates all kinds of headaches, but it isnt always viable if USA is coming after u strong in the pac.

    Curious… but why the Naval base?

    I can tell you why -I- would do it (in fact, I sometimes do it at Java). With the NB you have a reaction force that can reach Sydney, New Zealand, either of Hawai/Calcutta -basically everywhere on the Pacific except the sea of Japan itself- in 1 sortie.

    You can observe the allies’ mistakes and take advantage of it in 1 turn. If they do not make any mistakes, at least you have a strong strategic position.

  • Customizer

    Hey all,
    I have heard a few times of a UK strategy of basically giving up India to Japan. Like UK Pacific builds up men and equipment there seemingly for a strong defense then when Japan comes on with a big force ready to attack next round, the UK player moves all the UK units out of India, basically handing over a VC to Japan.
    I understand not wanting to lose all those troops and equipment, especially if Japan has a big enough force that UK is sure to lose the battle, but don’t you want to make Japan fight and lose units in taking Calcutta?
    Am I missing something here?


  • If UK stack is likely to only take out Japan slow moving ground units and a plane or two, then no, I think it’s a bad idea to stay there and get wiped out.  Most of Japan’s slow moving units at that point can’t do much of anything for awhile, although they maybe could chase the UK-India stack wherever it goes.

    But an evacuating UK-India can go trample out the Axis in the Middle east and/or go reinforce/help in Russia or the back side of China.

    Again, if UK-India stack (including some aircraft) is just going to sit there and kill a dozen or so slow-moving Japan units and a plane or two to AA fire, that’s a terrible trade for the Allies.  And the remaining Japanese units can flood west anyway.

    I would think India should only take a stand if they have a good chance of taking out several good (mech/tanks/airplanes) Japanese units, in which case they may have a chance of doing a lot of damage or even outright holding.

    You don’t want the Axis player to know you plan to evacuate India no matter what, because then they don’t have to send as much at India and can focus on getting 1 more VC and the win.  Once India falls, of course, the Allies have the problem of being 1 VC from a loss and having to defend both Hawaii and NSW every turn until a VC can be taken back
    So as far as having a “strategy” to evacuate India, like you intend to move the India stack to the Middle East or Russia at the first good chance, well you’d better have the USA focusing on Japan from the beginning of the game (which a lot of players actually do, these days)


  • I agree with Gamerman!
    UK makes a stand when it can take down a lot of Japanese air with it. Makes defending the other two VC so much easier.

    If you cannot hit a lot of Japanese air, retreat and you may even be able to take India back immediately if Japan walks in with all his might. Depends on how much RAF the UK has in the middle east and how much Japan has invested in taking India. Remember Japanese air cannot land there if he takes it.

    It is not too hard for the UK to return to India with those Indians + European reinforcements having 120+ attack factors from 50-70 units. Japan will have to invest so heavily in holding India and/or keeping its airforce around for defense, that hunting for the other VCs (Hawai, Sydney) cannot receive much investments/the much needed air units.
    Because if they do, they may well end up with Hawai taken (or not) while the UK kicks them out of Calcutta again!


  • Good point about possibly attacking/retaking India with the UK stack.  Forgot about that option when I did my reply

  • Customizer

    Interesting point guys. I had never thought of it that way. Most of the time when Japan comes for Calcutta, they come very “air heavy” and those planes can’t help them defend. Simply move the British stack out, let Japan move in with what land units they have there, then pounce on them and take Calcutta back. After that, in all likelihood, Japan will have little to no ground troops around and you will have made their big air force almost useless (at least for retaking Calcutta, that is).
    I can also see where a large British stack could be useful in claiming/reinforcing the Middle East and helping out the Russians or defending Cairo. Although, it seems like they might be followed by the army of angry Japanese that took Calcutta, plus anything that Japan builds with it’s new factory in Calcutta.

    You mentioned extra troops from UK Europe. Perhaps we are not playing UK right, but usually UK Europe has it’s hands full keeping Italy in check and trying to sting Germany somewhere. In fact, there is rarely any collaboration between UK Europe and UK Pacific in our games. Sometimes, if it doesn’t look like Japan is threatening Calcutta, UK Pacific will make some planes and fly them over to help in the Med, but otherwise the two sides are pretty much separate. They each seem to have too much going on in their own theater to try helping the other side. I mean, if UK Europe sends stuff over to help out India, won’t that make them weak against Italy? If Italy is played right, all they need is that one shot where UK is a little weaker than normal and they end up spreading like a plague throughout Africa.


  • @knp7765:

    Interesting point guys. I had never thought of it that way. Most of the time when Japan comes for Calcutta, they come very “air heavy” and those planes can’t help them defend. Simply move the British stack out, let Japan move in with what land units they have there, then pounce on them and take Calcutta back. After that, in all likelihood, Japan will have little to no ground troops around and you will have made their big air force almost useless (at least for retaking Calcutta, that is).
    I can also see where a large British stack could be useful in claiming/reinforcing the Middle East and helping out the Russians or defending Cairo. Although, it seems like they might be followed by the army of angry Japanese that took Calcutta, plus anything that Japan builds with it’s new factory in Calcutta.

    You mentioned extra troops from UK Europe. Perhaps we are not playing UK right, but usually UK Europe has it’s hands full keeping Italy in check and trying to sting Germany somewhere. In fact, there is rarely any collaboration between UK Europe and UK Pacific in our games. Sometimes, if it doesn’t look like Japan is threatening Calcutta, UK Pacific will make some planes and fly them over to help in the Med, but otherwise the two sides are pretty much separate. They each seem to have too much going on in their own theater to try helping the other side. I mean, if UK Europe sends stuff over to help out India, won’t that make them weak against Italy? If Italy is played right, all they need is that one shot where UK is a little weaker than normal and they end up spreading like a plague throughout Africa.

    I agree with you 100% on making Italy weeks early off and fast. To help Calcuta if needed

    My typical move as England (if there is no Sealion) destroy the Italain Destroyer and there Transport. Non combat move over my entire navy to the French destroyer and Cruser and bring that extra cruser off Gibralter to my Combined fleet also while I’m doing that I remove my Tactical bomber and place the two fighters from Gibralter and Malta for added dice roll at 4.
    I place the tactical in Egypt move all my units from Alxandria to Egypt because the bulk of the Italian army won’t be able to make it to Egypt even with the (2 transports that Italy has 2 crusers and 1 battleship and 1 Stratigic bomber it won’t be able to make a dent in Egypt. The 1 transport I have I move my 1 guy below Egypt (can’t think of the teratory) but below Egypt to Iraq for 2more Ipc and 3 men. I place a Ic in Egypt. Build a fighter in South Africa and a tank there aswell and Force Italy to deal with that looming Britsh navy in the meditranian with a combined power of 1 carrier with 2 fighter planes 3 crusers and 2 destroyers.
    This gives England enough firepower that when Italy moves into Alxandria. Englad can desamate the entire land army in Africa.

    I’m pretty sure everyone’s Calcutas Round 1 is basicaly standerd so no need to write up

    But yes this is how I deal with Italy esentualy what eve they choose to do Ill either destroy there Entire navy or put them in a position for me to take them out Enland round 2


  • @Whitshadw:

    @knp7765:

    Interesting point guys. I had never thought of it that way. Most of the time when Japan comes for Calcutta, they come very “air heavy” and those planes can’t help them defend. Simply move the British stack out, let Japan move in with what land units they have there, then pounce on them and take Calcutta back. After that, in all likelihood, Japan will have little to no ground troops around and you will have made their big air force almost useless (at least for retaking Calcutta, that is).
    I can also see where a large British stack could be useful in claiming/reinforcing the Middle East and helping out the Russians or defending Cairo. Although, it seems like they might be followed by the army of angry Japanese that took Calcutta, plus anything that Japan builds with it’s new factory in Calcutta.

    You mentioned extra troops from UK Europe. Perhaps we are not playing UK right, but usually UK Europe has it’s hands full keeping Italy in check and trying to sting Germany somewhere. In fact, there is rarely any collaboration between UK Europe and UK Pacific in our games. Sometimes, if it doesn’t look like Japan is threatening Calcutta, UK Pacific will make some planes and fly them over to help in the Med, but otherwise the two sides are pretty much separate. They each seem to have too much going on in their own theater to try helping the other side. I mean, if UK Europe sends stuff over to help out India, won’t that make them weak against Italy? If Italy is played right, all they need is that one shot where UK is a little weaker than normal and they end up spreading like a plague throughout Africa.

    I agree with you 100% on making Italy weeks early off and fast. To help Calcuta if needed

    My typical move as England (if there is no Sealion) destroy the Italain Destroyer and there Transport. Non combat move over my entire navy to the French destroyer and Cruser and bring that extra cruser off Gibralter to my Combined fleet also while I’m doing that I remove my Tactical bomber and place the two fighters from Gibralter and Malta for added dice roll at 4.
    I place the tactical in Egypt move all my units from Alxandria to Egypt because the bulk of the Italian army won’t be able to make it to Egypt even with the (2 transports that Italy has 2 crusers and 1 battleship and 1 Stratigic bomber it won’t be able to make a dent in Egypt. The 1 transport I have I move my 1 guy below Egypt (can’t think of the teratory) but below Egypt to Iraq for 2more Ipc and 3 men. I place a Ic in Egypt. Build a fighter in South Africa and a tank there aswell and Force Italy to deal with that looming Britsh navy in the meditranian with a combined power of 1 carrier with 2 fighter planes 3 crusers and 2 destroyers.
    This gives England enough firepower that when Italy moves into Alxandria. Englad can desamate the entire land army in Africa.

    I’m pretty sure everyone’s Calcutas Round 1 is basicaly standerd so no need to write up

    But yes this is how I deal with Italy esentualy what eve they choose to do Ill either destroy there Entire navy or put them in a position for me to take them out Enland round 2

    A very interesting idea Whit.  It is very hard for italy to kill the combined fleet alone.  It seems like the axis will need to use italy to soften it up and finish it off with ger.


  • Yea Whit, that is something I haven’t seen before (very interesting). If the Italians hit it the combo fleet, they loose most of their fleet, maybe some air (even if they hit & run). They won’t get their Med NO, and it forces Germany to risk air power to finish the job. In the mean time you start bringing over the UK India fleet, and use both your African ICs for men/ships as needed.

    I also agree that it could be better to trade India, then loose all your UK units (they can make the Mid East/Russia very interesting). I will normally build mech/tanks early w/India for more mobility. Chances are Japan won’t have the power to amphib you on W India, or all their planes can’t reach. It can be deflating to the Japanese player to see you withdraw, and for him to decide how many units to take into India (I would probably leave 3-4 inf there so he can’t take it with only a couple guys). At that point he doesn’t know if you want to counter him, or keep moving west/north.


  • I like the consolidating move in the med,
    but I must admit I have some doubts about an IC in Egypt that early on. I’ll try this one out next game I play. Usually I build 2FTR+2INF in London and when the possibility of even a surprise Sea Lion is gone I’ll fly the FTR over to Africa->Egypt.

    The 2FTR+2INF can make Germany’s victory in London a Pyrrhus one, even if UK executes ‘Taranto’ UK1. Building an IC in Egypt UK1 leaves London with building max 5INF UK1 for defense. 2 less combat factors, but 1 more unit… Might work ;-).


  • Thanks guys on the Med strat with the ships! I’ll explan with the Ic in Egypt round 1.
    If I see Germany’s round 1 buys and troop
    Movements aren’t anything to do with a Sealion then this is my main setup as England round 1

    It forces Italy to deal with the navy and if it dosnt then one if 2 things can happin I can pick off transports and Italy dosnt collect te bounes or Germany will have to ring down the full force of its Airforce and since it has no ships for fodder then any plane I pick off is one less for defense/offense in Russia.

    Also Italy will have only 2 transports it’s round 1 to do anything with. It’s Airforce can’t attack Egypt and have anywhere to land beside his bomber. He will have 1 shore bombardment with 1 battleship and 2 crusers and he can only carry over 2infantry and 2 tanks at most and from Tobrok he can only shoot over 1tank and 1 mech

    While my total round 1 defense of Egypt is 2 Anzac and 4 British Infantry 1 AA (transported from Malta if you really think it’s needed) 2 Artilary 1 mech and 1 Tank with 1 tactical

    If you ask me that’s a tuff egg to crack for round 1 Italy Runre simulator and you tell me what there odds are.

    That Ic in Egypt makes the game for England over Italy and clinches the middleast also.

    So this is my round 1 setup for England with no Sealion 1 Ic in Egypt 1 fighter in South Africa and 1 tank in South Africa. Round 2 I simply fly them up to Egypt and continue to add to what ever else I need there.

    If your worried about a round 2 push add 1 destroyer into the water off Egypt that negates his off shore BB and you still have double to numbers and can even repel any attack.

    Hope this helps guys


  • Whitshadw, I believe you may be mistaken about transporting to Iraq for 3 more men. As England you have to fight them as they are pro-axis.


  • @Larrie:

    Whitshadw, I believe you may be mistaken about transporting to Iraq for 3 more men. As England you have to fight them as they are pro-axis.

    I wrote this at 8a.m. In a Dunken Donuts ment Iran for the 2 extra men but again it’s at your own descression. If you feel that Egypt needs to be further reinforced then take the 1infantry from Malta and the AA if you think you can hold out and don’t need those troops then ill send them to Iran. :)


  • @Whitshadw:

    (…)If I see Germany’s round 1 buys and troop
    Movements aren’t anything to do with a Sealion then this is my main setup as England round 1 (…)

    And what about a surprise Sea Lion?
    I have seen (and executed) a Barbarossa feighn, just to achieve what you seem to be doing UK1: UK building nothing in London at all and its med fleet dispositioned (or destroyed) in the med.

    Germany can still buy 10 TRS GE2 and RAID UK IC+AB (Italy can use its STR (+FTR) to RAID the UK airbase after UK’s turn as well so comes GE3 the UK cannot scramble).
    With only some UK2 builds to protect London after repairing its IC, no option to scramble (most likely), the German surprise attack on London is very effective. Particularly if UK has built an IC in Egypt that suddenly falls silent because London cannot collect any income anymore.

    I find it very dangerous, that IC in Egypt UK1. But I would consider building it UK2 instead for certain!


  • @ItIsILeClerc:

    @Whitshadw:

    (…)If I see Germany’s round 1 buys and troop
    Movements aren’t anything to do with a Sealion then this is my main setup as England round 1 (…)

    And what about a surprise Sea Lion?
    I have seen (and executed) a Barbarossa feighn, just to achieve what you seem to be doing UK1: UK building nothing in London at all and its med fleet dispositioned (or destroyed) in the med.

    Germany can still buy 10 TRS GE2 and RAID UK IC+AB (Italy can use its STR (+FTR) to RAID the UK airbase after UK’s turn as well so comes GE3 the UK cannot scramble).
    With only some UK2 builds to protect London after repairing its IC, no option to scramble (most likely), the German surprise attack on London is very effective. Particularly if UK has built an IC in Egypt that suddenly falls silent because London cannot collect any income anymore.

    I find it very dangerous, that IC in Egypt UK1. But I would consider building it UK2 instead for certain!

    for sure you can still do this for sure

    12 Ipcs for the IC in Egypt

    10 for a fighter for England and 2 more Infantry for England it self.

    Pull down the fighter from Scotland and the 2 Infantry and 1AA  Also

    Now this is a big also if Italy did not destroy or attack the navy or Germany is saving its Airorce for England’s attack then the 2 Fighters from sea zone 93 do make it back to England (count te spaces)

    So basicaly at Round 2 England you see a Sealion comming you’ll already have 6 infantry 5 anti aircraft 1 mech and 7 fighters in England

    2 British that originally start with in England
    1 French
    1 from Scottland
    1 you bought from Round 1
    And the 2 from the Aircraft Carrier ( If Italy didn’t attack but I can’t see them winning) and if Germany is doing a Sealion they need to save there Airforce for it

    Which leaves you to still have your buys for England round 2 and still be reactive.

  • Sponsor

    If the UK doesn’t attack the Italian Battleship, and moves all their ships to consolidate with the 2 French ships, I would send every German plane to wipe them out G2.


  • @Young:

    If the UK doesn’t attack the Italian Battleship, and moves all their ships to consolidate with the 2 French ships, I would send every German plane to wipe them out G2.

    that’s what I want you to do! See how many planes you’ll loose not only that your not bombing England your not attacking the airfields and Sealion is a wimper and I’ll still have a Round 1 IC in Egypt and still be able to hold England .

  • Sponsor

    @Whitshadw:

    @Young:

    If the UK doesn’t attack the Italian Battleship, and moves all their ships to consolidate with the 2 French ships, I would send every German plane to wipe them out G2.

    that’s what I want you to do! See how many planes you’ll loose not only that your not bombing England your not attacking the airfields and Sealion is a wimper and I’ll still have a Round 1 IC in Egypt and still be able to hold England .

    Yes, I agree… but I can do a lot of damage in Africa and the middle east with an Italy that has a battleship fleet and zero British boats in the Med.


  • @Young:

    @Whitshadw:

    @Young:

    If the UK doesn’t attack the Italian Battleship, and moves all their ships to consolidate with the 2 French ships, I would send every German plane to wipe them out G2.

    that’s what I want you to do! See how many planes you’ll loose not only that your not bombing England your not attacking the airfields and Sealion is a wimper and I’ll still have a Round 1 IC in Egypt and still be able to hold England .

    Yes, I agree… but I can do a lot of damage in Africa and the middle east with an Italy that has a battleship fleet and zero British boats in the Med.

    ofcorse you would it all depends In what Germany buys round 2 again they just lost half there Airforce so no Sealion happining. That tells me I can buy 3 fighters for defense of Egypt. At the end of round 2 I’ll have.
    A total of
    7infantry
    2 Artilary
    1 mech
    1 AA
    1 Tank
    1 tactical bomber
    3 fighters

    You don’t have the numbers for Egypt but everything’s else in the med is up for grasp for sure.
    Crunch the numbers see what you get

    Also let’s face facts Italy is looking for other objectives to complete still Yugoslavia, Greece, south France , Gibralter  etc


  • Yes, I agree… but I can do a lot of damage in Africa and the middle east with an Italy that has a battleship fleet and zero British boats in the Med.

    If the allied player does it right, that giant fleet can sit in the Med.  I’ve only seen Italy out of the Med a few times, and I’ve only been playing about a year.  Most of the time, they sit in the Med and go for bonuses.

    Also let’s face facts Italy is looking for other objectives to complete still Yugoslavia, Greece, south France , Gibralter  etc

    In round 2?  Why didn’t Italy take Yugo, S. France and Greece in round 1?  Yes, it all depends on the strategy you plan on taking for the rest of the game, but if Italy isn’t going up at least Greece or S. France in round 1…  Is Italy just taking the single IPC territories in Africa?  You start with enough troops in Italy to take S. France with 2 inf/art, Yugo with inf/art/strafe (if Germany hit them first round) and Greece (if 2 transports still live).

Suggested Topics

  • 46
  • 3
  • 16
  • 94
  • 9
  • 13
  • 28
  • 1
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

29

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts