@oysteilo said in League General Discussion Thread:
@WindowWasher i think this is something that should be considered. I think the main reason is, sometimes these games takes FOREVER. What is the “record” to decide a new champ? 1.5 years? 2 years? Could be more stict on time and “always” honor the 72h limit
But i would vote yes to a 16 bracket for the championship. I think it is a good suggestion and will also create more interest.
24 is weird
16 is nice, since u have then 8, 4 , 2
Haven`t been here for some time.
Is the majority of games now played PTV ? Or BM and older versions are still stronger?
And one more question about bids in BM4. Have they changed much ? What are the average bids these days there?
@aequitas:
Where is that voice coming from?? :lol: :lol:
Nobody invades true neutrals with Axis but Amon`s Wehrmacht 8-)
@oysteilo said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
@oysteilo said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
@Adam514 ahhhh, then I misunderstood. Sorry
But there is no plan for changing the cost of battleships and cruisers. Would that follow the same logic or is this not an issue (given no one really buys)
and it is a pretty big question will people massively buy tacs once bombers go to 14 ipc. think not.
I have sent my apprentice to crush the true neutrals 
@oysteilo said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
@oysteilo said in G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread:
@Adam514 ahhhh, then I misunderstood. Sorry
But there is no plan for changing the cost of battleships and cruisers. Would that follow the same logic or is this not an issue (given no one really buys)
battleships, cruisers, tacs, tanks and marines need a change. that change would make people buy them often, and it would make the game more interesting, and people wouldn`t just swarming inf/mechs, figs/ACs and des/subs
I like it already. Especially the Russian thing, and reduced naval units cost.
Its definitely worth a try.
well I wouldnt name it that, but it has some elements xD
i need to play uk , had job with the kids. i ll try soon
@farmboy said in League General Discussion Thread:
@amon-sul welcome back!
the majority is still BM but games of ptv and oob are pretty common too. Bids for BM have moved to around 20 lately (although I think that is a little high).
Thanks.
And what about DOV. What is most common for Japan , rd 1, rd 2, rd 3?
And is it much different in PTV?
Haven`t been here for some time.
Is the majority of games now played PTV ? Or BM and older versions are still stronger?
And one more question about bids in BM4. Have they changed much ? What are the average bids these days there?
@pejon_88 said in Post League Game Results Here:
@trulpen and @Amon-Sul thank you guys. Was maybe the most unique game I have played and against the most unique opponent
It was very even throughout many rounds. One additional thing I think made a difference is that Germany never was able to take Caucasus and Volgograd.
Yeah, i tried, and held but wasnt able to make a foothold there. I tried with the Romania IC and the Black Sea fleet to pull dudes there, but I failed. But as U said, I was close at times. It prevailed to Ur side.
What do U think about this strategy (rd 2 neutral crush) and this game?
Is it viable, or should I resing from further testing and improving it 
If I ve won this game it would be one of the greatest win ever. But Ur win is totaly deserved. After that Norway foothold I had a lot of luck in some battles. I didnt deserved to win.
Its hard playing the axis, I must say.
With allies its smoother haha
@amon-sul said in Post League Game Results Here:
Pejon 88 (Allies) over Amon Sul (Axis)
An interesting game in which the axis took a neutral crush on rd 2, make early foothold in Spain and Turkey, and where able to keep them until the end of the game. A strong Italy, a strong Turkey.
The allies found their way to make a little foothold in Shan State and pull air from there to Russia. That was the beginning of troubles for the Axis. The final death blow was the axis taking a foothold in Norway. It was the start of the end.
I paid the price of not being exp much with Axis and I must say @Pejon_88 played a really good game.
I am glad i tested this interesting strategy against an excellent opponent , which Pejon 88 definitely is.
Against a weaker opponent i would probably won the game. But this how I can see better the flaws and good sides of the strategy.
Anyway we had a lot of fun , so all this time wasnt spent for nothing.
cheers
A strong Italy, and a strong Russia, not Turkey
Pejon 88 (Allies) over Amon Sul (Axis)
An interesting game in which the axis took a neutral crush on rd 2, make early foothold in Spain and Turkey, and where able to keep them until the end of the game. A strong Italy, a strong Turkey.
The allies found their way to make a little foothold in Shan State and pull air from there to Russia. That was the beginning of troubles for the Axis. The final death blow was the axis taking a foothold in Norway. It was the start of the end.
I paid the price of not being exp much with Axis and I must say @Pejon_88 played a really good game.
I am glad i tested this interesting strategy against an excellent opponent , which Pejon 88 definitely is.
Against a weaker opponent i would probably won the game. But this how I can see better the flaws and good sides of the strategy.
Anyway we had a lot of fun , so all this time wasnt spent for nothing.
cheers
I ll call it off here.
U were better
I resign
full scramble with german air please
i dont have a legal way to adjust.
dont have an extra roll for air
and its not maybe fair play to roll all the battles from the begining, too complicated it is.
it will stay as it is.
u may proceed with triple allied move when ready
cheers
