Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

ANZAC planes landing in Dutch territories (Java/Sumatra) on same turn they were taken by ANZAC

Axis & Allies Global 1940

4.8k

M

MarshmallowofWar 21 20 19 18 17 16
last edited by

“Let’s eat Grandma”

“Let’s eat, Grandma”

COMMAS SAVE LIVES.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 2

3 / 3

T-shirts, Hats, and More

global 1940

187

anniversary

1914

1942 2nd ed

tips&tricks

bm3

video

axis & allies

Suggested Topics

F

Anzac Shuck Into Europe

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • FranceNeedsMorePower

79

0
Votes

79
Posts

3.8k
Views

S

@Cornwallis

I agree with the main points you made in the Pacific.
I

US Air Land on East Russian Territories

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Ichabod

5

0
Votes

5
Posts

842
Views

S

And Russia has to be at war specifically with Japan. Also, USA has to be at war with someone. Any Axis power will do.
K

How do you turn the corner with Russia

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • KGrimB

14

0
Votes

14
Posts

1.7k
Views

C

@larrymarx:

What about building an airbase in Soviet Far East and having the Americans send stacks of fighters through Asia, first threatening Japan and then moving onward to reinforce your troops in or near your capital?

Not sure if that is a good idea, I think it would be best off just having US sent air power anyways and then have the eastern Red Army capture boarder Chinese territories for US to attack from.
D

USA Strategy/Purchasing

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • DCWhat

31

0
Votes

31
Posts

7.1k
Views

N

Gotcha. I think we’re talking about two different things though.

My understanding was the other poster was saying “Placing fighters in CUS is no different than placing them in EUS” which of course wouldn’t be the case. I see your point though and I agree 8-)
D

Was there an ANZAC Roundel?

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • djensen

9

0
Votes

9
Posts

2.2k
Views

C

I hate to break this to you but the term ANZAC actually doesn’t apply to WWII era Australia and New Zealand. It goes for the term in WWI, however to somewhat contradict this statement; there was an ANZAC corp giving by the UK to a combine unit in Greece. So it did exist in small numbers but as far as the strategic use of it, Australia and New Zealand never combined their arms into one military in WWII. With that said, I don’t think you can find an ANZAC roundel for WWII as I am guessing each nation would use whatever their roundel would be.
G

Can American planes land in Soviet Far east? If Russia at peace with Japan?

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Gargantua

17

0
Votes

17
Posts

3.2k
Views

W

Yes. They would all become Allied friendly.
J

France in the Turn Order

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • Jennifer

19

0
Votes

19
Posts

3.0k
Views

J

@Sid:

France offered to hold their action so that Germany could go immediately, thus allowing Italy and Germany to coordinate more fluidly, instead of interrupting to state they were doing nothing and causing a multiple day delay between Italy and Germany.

If the players agreed to the change in order, the agreement should stand. Why should the Axis assume France would not make the attack if the order has been changed. Have the online moves been being submitted as if France was going in it’s original order?

It was not an agreement that the turn order was different. That would have constituted a house rule and why would France give up the right to screw up the Axis plan forevermore in perpetuity? No, it was a contingent offer that if Italy did nothing to instigate an attack by France, then Germany could be allowed to move so as not to slow down the game.
M

Damaged Carrier & Planes

Axis & Allies Global 1940
• • • MarkVIIIMarc

4

0
Votes

4
Posts

1.5k
Views

K

Your understanding is correct, MarkVIIIMarc. However, in scenario 2 the UK player has no casualty options that won’t result in stranding the fighter. Since sub hits must be taken on sea units, the only casualty options are the one you chose or taking both hits on the carrier, dooming both fighters. At any rate, taking the hit on the carrier and stranding the fighter is always an option.

12

Online

18.1k

Users

40.9k

Topics

1.8m

Posts