Here's your Sign…

For what it is worth, i’m a mutable water - pisces. 
Personally - i think it’s all bullshit.  i really don’t think i share that much in common with 1/12th of the rest of the world.  Another pisces who is really into astrology actually argued with me about whether i was a pisces or not because i really “didn’t fit” and because we were so different (he was a neonatologist, by the way).  Weird.

4/20 national smoke weed day.  perfect birthday!  :lol:

me, aqaurius, and i dont know what that means.

Astrology is total bunk and a half. When i hear somebody ask such a stupid thing as “what sign are you?” I think about gypsies and voodoo witchcraft and those damm dolls they stick needles into. Because that would in fact be the next step in de-evolutional insanity for these people.

@AgentOrange:

Well, I’m not saying to treat astrology as concrete guidelines, just that it’s pretty freaky how some things fit so well.  And yes, CC, in some cases your sign really may not fit you AT ALL.  But in my case, it’s pretty much dead-on.

people who want to believe in this stuff will find that their sign fits them - whether it does or not.  People with a more objective outlook can find elements of every sign that will fit them, and they can find elements of every sign which will not.

The Fuhrer’s bday is also Columbine day. versatile day, 4/20 is.

and jen, you’ve got me beat by one day

4/19, 4/20, 4/21…not really of any significance, just kinda funny

also- i put no stock in this astrology bs, but i will say that my friends and I have looked at books at Borders in the section where astrology books are found (metaphysics maybe?) which were about the significance of names and such…and my circle of friends seems to be the archetypal group, since the name descriptions fit very well with the respective people. <shrug>i still dont believe any of it, because while my friend mike fit the description of “mike” very well, i know plenty of mikes who dont at all.</shrug>

I think with much of that stuff  there is a tendency to call it true because it is true once. And a simutaneous tendency to call it false because it is false once.

That it isn’t always accurate doesn’t mean that it is always without value.

I enjoy looking at horoscopes for shits & giggles.  Often I’ll read my daily the following day to see what works.  I’m a lot like CC in that you can make anything fit…

I don’t put a lot of credit in it, seeing as how much of it is arbitrary, and some things held as standard were obvious injections of agenda-driven research.  I’ve also read that there really should be 13 signs, and even without it, being born the same day of the same month 2000 years ago would have granted you a different sign.  Also, the effect of the planets is taken into consideration, but the impact of the moon is not (which clearly has an effect)?  WTF?

My favorite astrologist is Rob Brezsny: he doesn’t seem to take himself so seriously, yet obviously spends quite a bit of time on the subject.  http://www.freewillastrology.com/

Taurus? Astrology?

This is the Year of the Dog!

Dragons Rule!