• I’m assuming your talking about Russian TT’s?

    The TT’s adjacent to Moscow are

    Ukraine
    Belarus
    Livonia
    Tatarstan
    Karelia.

    All other Russian TT’s fall into the other Russian TT for Revolution Rules


  • No, i am talking about all countries.

    The rulebook says that

    ALL ORIGINALLY CONTROLLED TERRITORIES ARE ADJACENT TO THE CAPITAL EVEN IF THERE ARE OTHER TERRITORIES IN BETWEEN


  • @MEGAEINSTEIN:

    No, i am talking about all countries.

    The rulebook says that

    ALL ORIGINALLY CONTROLLED TERRITORIES ARE ADJACENT TO THE CAPITAL EVEN IF THERE ARE OTHER TERRITORIES IN BETWEEN

    What are you talking about?


  • What page is this on?

  • Customizer

    I think he’s confusing “Adjacent” with “Regional” (page 11)


  • Maybe its a railway within your own country, to speed up the progress ?


  • Are all originally controlled territories adjacent to the capital?
    Even if there are other territoreies in brtween?


  • I am talking a bout the rulebook, chapter about move

    It says something like all german territories except colonies can trace a direct line from the capital, that means that land units can jump from the capital to all originally controlled territories


  • ???

    Land units can only move one space per turn.

  • Official Q&A

    The rule says:

    Regional territories are adjacent to one another and can trace a line across adjacent territories directly to their capital territory.

    There is nothing in there that suggests that such territories are considered to be adjacent to the capital for any purpose.


  • Krieghund could you ask Mr. Harris about this?

    In your opinion why you cantrace a line from your territories to the capital EXCEPT colonies?


  • @MEGAEINSTEIN:

    Krieghund could you ask Mr. Harris about this?

    In your opinion why you cantrace a line from your territories to the capital EXCEPT colonies?

    I seriously have no idea what you are talking about.  Where is this from and what are you asking?

  • Official Q&A

    The point of the sentence I quoted is simply to differentiate “regional territories” from “colonies”.  Regional territories can trace a line through contiguous original territories back to the capital, while colonies are removed from the capital.  The only difference this really makes is that colonies of minor powers are handled a little differently than their capitals.  Since minor powers don’t have regional territories anyway, this sentence is more about “flavor” than anything else.

Suggested Topics

  • 3
  • 9
  • 4
  • 4
  • 20
  • 9
  • 3
  • 1
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

43

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts