This topic has been moved to Software.
Software
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=40449.0
AA50 re release
-
Krieghund has today, at Larrys game design forum, more or less statet that there will come a new revision of Revised, that will be called A&A AH 1942 edition. He is propably one of the playtesters. May admin please make a new sub-forum for threads about this new game.plz.
-
What would you name the new board? AA42-2009?
-
AA42
-
Urban Collector says it is a Ltd Edition.
-
Urban Collector says it is a Ltd Edition.
What’s with all these Ltd Edition games??? :-o
-
@Rakeman:
Why do you keep saying this will be a watered down version of revised? How do you know it will be worse than revised, or anything else about it for that matter?
What I meant to say is that this game will be a watered down version of Anniversary. It’s likely this new game will be equal to or marginally better than Revised. However, it’s guaranteed to be inferior to Anniversary. It’s a smaller board, less territories, less pieces, no Italy as a playable fraction, no unique China front, poorer quality presentation, etc. Really, why give up Anniversary for this junk?
And no, I don’t believe Revised II is mutually compatible with Anniversary. This isn’t A&A:Europe or A&A:Battle of the Bulge. Revised II will have to compete for playing time against Anniversary. How often do you guys play Revised now that you have Anniversary? Because if you’re going to play a board game with a world at war scope, you might as well play Anniversary, which is a more fleshed out game.
Personally I think it would be awesome if it was revised with cruisers added in and the AA50 rules… $70 is too much for a boardgame. $50 is my limit
If you’re not willing to shell out $100 for the best board game you’ll ever play, then why go here? I’m serious. This board is for people who play AA:50 or intend on doing so. Saying $50 is too much; why don’t you hang out on the Revised board instead?
Also, how can you have AA:50 rules on a Revised game? There’s no unique China front, Italy isn’t playable, the NO system will probably have to be drastically revised…
-
AA42 will have its own forum and sub forum for strategy. Its not Revised or AA50. Its different.
I have no idea why they made another global AA game. I hope its like a deluxe version of Revised, but it cant be because of the price. I know for a fact that its not revised but its using the map from it but it will be different.
I think this limited edition thing is kinda weird, but its promoting multiple projects and thats a good thing.
The name is kinda ridiculous also.
-
@Imperious:
AA42 will have its own forum and sub forum for strategy. Its not Revised or AA50. Its different.
I have no idea why they made another global AA game. I hope its like a deluxe version of Revised, but it cant be because of the price. I know for a fact that its not revised but its using the map from it but it will be different.
I think this limited edition thing is kinda weird, but its promoting multiple projects and thats a good thing.
The name is kinda ridiculous also.
The most surprising thing to me is that it sorta came out of nowhere… if it wasn’t for the retailers announcing it, we’d have no idea about it. And we thought they gave too little promotion on AA50… one day you’ll walk into a store and find some A&A game you never heard of if this keeps up :|
It’s using the map from revised, as in, the same map identically? That’s quite strange. So it’s not revised, but it has the same map, same nations, same price… maybe it will be a boxed set that comes with LHTR! … :oops:
-
its not revised. It says new units AND new Sculpts. Which means Plural of more than one new type of unit…so its not even revised. Plus it says modified rules.
I think its the deluxe version of Revised that we were asking from larry back in 2005-7. It may be all new pieces or it may just be what we got in AA50 sans Italy. Its got to be a new map but very close to Revised.
Perhaps the tokens are thicker and the player aids are better quality and map is larger too?
-
Well, isn’t the blurb they gave exactly identical to the one they gave with Revised? Perhaps they just recycled the Revised blurb and therefore we don’t really know ANYTHING about it… dunno.
-
well for starters its got 370 pieces and Revised had 366 pieces.
Its got similar script, but the chimps at WOTC always do the minimal work effort and probably just took the script from Revised and tweaked it just to get the job done … which was to give the company’s that are selling it something to have for their pre-order sales.
-
@Imperious:
well for starters its got 370 pieces and Revised had 366 pieces.
Its got similar script, but the chimps at WOTC always do the minimal work effort and probably just took the script from Revised and tweaked it just to get the job done … which was to give the company’s that are selling it something to have for their pre-order sales.
I just wonder what those 4 extra pieces could possibly be, lol. Unless they plan on removing other pieces to make room for more…
-
I am not surprised
never agreed with the popular view that anniversary is the new revisedyes anniversary is better and all that
but it is not a replacement for revised, way too expensivenot that Hasbro cares about Australia but its $115 vs. $50 here
-
Second, since they decided AA50 is only for the people who buy it on release date and stopped producing copies, it would cost quite a bit more than $100 at this point. On ebay the cheapest right now is $130! Oops. Well, at least they are producing AA42 for people like me who missed it the first time and didn’t want to spend so much!
This is entirely Hasbro’s fault. Instead of superseding Revised with Anniversary, they decided that only a few people should have access to Anniversary. They made Anniversary a limited edition game and stuck to their word. So instead of Hasbro reaping the rewards of a game people WANT to play, it’s the secondary market which is making the killing. Ironically, Hasbro does not make a dime from that market.
Now as for your next question/demand… are you a moderator? Just curious, seeing how you are telling me where I can or cannot post.
Anybody can post anywhere. I just question the rationale of someone who’s played A&A:50 (on Triple A no less); determined it was not worth the price of admission yet continues to troll the A&A:50 board. You’re right. A&A:50 is not worth $100. It’s worth far more than that. That is a statement the majority of visitors in this board will agree with.
Once I played A&A:50, there was really no going back to revised for me.
–-
I have no idea why they made another global AA game. I hope its like a deluxe version of Revised, but it cant be because of the price. I know for a fact that its not revised but its using the map from it but it will be different.
Hasbro would’ve been much better off making a revised edition of Europe. With AA1942, that makes THREE versions of the Global Game (since AA1942 is not meant as a replacement to revised). Can someone say over-saturation?
-
Maybe this is an expansion… I dont know… It doesnt make sense to release another version of global AA 5 years after AA Revised…!
-
It’s pretty weird. But I could make a try and playing it (on-line of course) if China is finally well done. I could try even if China is semi-decent done, or any state of better done than in AA50 :-P
It’s totally ilogical release this. I would be better testing AA50 more time (mainly Asian battlefield) and make it better balanced and less buggy then having 2 games, one unbalanced yet played and other that will not be played or buyed by many :|
-
@TG:
Anybody can post anywhere. I just question the rationale of someone who’s played A&A:50 (on Triple A no less); determined it was not worth the price of admission yet continues to troll the A&A:50 board. You’re right. A&A:50 is not worth $100. It’s worth far more than that. That is a statement the majority of visitors in this board will agree with.
Once I played A&A:50, there was really no going back to revised for me.
For “the record,” I stated my friend owns a physical copy of the game. Second, as this topic has nothing to do with AA50 but instead a new title in the series, I don’t think it’s fair to consider this “trolling the AA50” board, as this isn’t the rightful place for this topic anyway.
The majority is not always right :wink: Tell me how many games have you played outside of the Axis and Allies series?
I will agree that their time would have been better spent on an Axis and Allies Europe Revised game, but, the time spent on this new one is unknown… could have taken a few days to draw up for all we know. Plus, I don’t think the Axis and Allies game system is well suited for a Europe conflict game (unless they go the Bulge/Guadalcanal “All New Mechanics” route) as I fail to see how it would possibly become anything but a tank rush to moscow. Of course, I would be very happy for Larry to prove me wrong! I think developing a better version of Pacific would be better than making a new Europe, as I think it has more potential… new naval combat rules like Guadalcanal would be great, for example.
-
It’s pretty weird. But I could make a try and playing it (on-line of course) if China is finally well done. I could try even if China is semi-decent done, or any state of better done than in AA50 :-P
It’s totally ilogical release this. I would be better testing AA50 more time (mainly Asian battlefield) and make it better balanced and less buggy then having 2 games, one unbalanced yet played and other that will not be played or buyed by many :|
Oh please, you know most people here will buy anything with the Axis and Allies branding, including the 42 edition :wink: lol
I do agree about China, the 1941 scenario was a major appeal to me but China is just horribly implemented there… :|
-
Im always excited to see another AAA out there, but I agree that AAE needs a revision and they should have just printed more copies of AA50.
-
Im always excited to see another AAA out there, but I agree that AAE needs a revision and they should have just printed more copies of AA50.
I totally agree. They should print a new version of A&A Europe with the cruiser units and the rules from A&A 50 Anniversary, and an Italian player. That would fix the issues with the present game, wich many claim to be broken.
But I do belive that the reason WOTC release a global game first, is the fact that more people are playing Revised than Europe. And there are no doubt whatsoever that the Anniversary rules are far superior to the Revised rules, so the Revised need to be revised again.
Now since Greg Leeds is the new boss in WOTC, and since he is a real bussines-man he will try harder to make money even if we are in the middle of a depression, he will give us a new A&A game every 4 month. In august we get A&A 1942. In january 2010 we get A&A Europe revised, and in august 2010 we get A&A Stalingrad, and in january 2011 we get A&A North Africa, and in august 2011 we get A&A the Great War 1914-1918. This is what both I and IL belive in. This is our religion.
Suggested Topics
