I can’t see a reason why the scrambled fighter can’t land in Normandy.
Bold (x) vs. Cmndr Jenn (+5), +NO, -tech
-
Attacker:
Rolls: 3@1 11@3; Total Hits: 103@1: (3, 1, 1)11@3: (6, 2, 3, 2, 2, 4, 2, 1, 5, 2, 2)
Defender:
Rolls: 2@2 12@3; Total Hits: 62@2: (1, 5)12@3: (5, 3, 6, 5, 6, 6, 5, 1, 2, 2, 2, 5) -
Retreat.
NCM: AA Guns from Karelia to Arkhangelsk, Russia to Novosibirsk, Caucasus to Russia
Build: 2 Infantry, 4 Fighters in Russia
Collect 33 IPC
(I think that essentially ends the threat to Moscow.)
-
Jenn, you just don’t ever get it. This game is over, you lose. You were bumped 4 times at >72 hrs.
-
you got some of the best dice i have ever seen and you still lost. gg
-
you got some of the best dice i have ever seen and you still lost. gg
Well, I’d like to get DM (the Anniversary League mod) give a ruling, but still, I’d like to play it out to the end either way. I don’t think the Axis can win this.
-
well if you UNBELIEVABLE dice were to continue the rest of the game, maybe the axis would not win. pretty hard to fathom how great your dice have been, but yes - go ahead and have DM give a ruling. i don’t think the rules could be more clear.
-
you got lucky to wipe out my combined fleet in z62, you got lucky to get more hits on my stack in euk than you took, you’ve gotten 80+ damage without losing a bomber, the list goes on and on and on.
you have way more problems in this game than russia falling or not. and you’re never going to take germany. trust me, it just saves us both a bunch of time to give the axis the win right here.
-
just want to make sure you realize that in three rounds in euk, the average results were for you to have one fighter left and for me to have 12 arm left. :lol: :lol:
-
in fact you’ve gotten so fantastically lucky, i guess it is justice that you timed out because you had no business winning this game. you should probably stick to global.
-
not saying you could win, but with dice like that all game, it’s the only way you’ve even been able to stay around. if that attack on euk doesn’t go miraculously GREAT, moscow would have fallen next round!! :lol:
-
I also havent enjoyed playing you because you refuse to type your noncombat moves and placement. I dont like to check all the time, and i havent.
-
Jenn, i would be willing to continue our game, if you will be clear about typing all your noncoms from now on, and you can commit to finishing the game without any greater than 3 day delays (unless you post that you need more time). AND you stop cheating by rigging the dicey!!! :wink:
Regardless, please let it be clear that the rules are clear on the 4 strikes and you’re out rule on 72 hour posting limits.
Bold
-
I do think the allies still have the edge in this game, despite the bonecrushing dice they have endured. if you want to continue, let me know. if you just do not have enough time to play the game out on a reasonable pace, let me know (i suspect you do not). i really do not like long pauses in games, so i was very happy about the 72 hour rule, i am not going to lie.
-
I do think the allies still have the edge in this game, despite the bonecrushing dice they have endured. if you want to continue, let me know. if you just do not have enough time to play the game out on a reasonable pace, let me know (i suspect you do not). i really do not like long pauses in games, so i was very happy about the 72 hour rule, i am not going to lie.
axis have the edge that is… freudian slip? :lol:
-
perhaps a fair compromise would be for you to redo your russian turn? :lol: i’d like to see the dice go a little more evenly rather than upper 1% for you… :roll:
-
I’ve had a couple lucky rounds, I admit. Perhaps the game would be lost if not for that luck, perhaps I would be in a better position without it (due to having to do different builds and tactics.)
Either way, I’d like to see how the game concludes as is. Mostly because I dislike not finishing games to the point of surrender (yes, I dislike winning or losing as well, mainly because I think this game should continue until one side surrenders - though I admit the need for some concrete rule for victory to deal with those players who won’t surrender until they are completely wiped out…)
-
So we agree i have won but we finish the game to satisfy your curiosity?
-
@Cmdr:
Perhaps the game would be lost if not for that luck, perhaps I would be in a better position without it (due to having to do different builds and tactics.)Â
:?
I warned you about Jenn, BoldDe-lus-ion-al
-
@Cmdr:
Perhaps the game would be lost if not for that luck, perhaps I would be in a better position without it (due to having to do different builds and tactics.)�
:?
I warned you about Jenn, BoldDe-lus-ion-al
yes after that response, i don’t really even want to continue the game, i may have to stick the rule book to you Jenn, and not satisfy your curiosity. i don’t think you can win this game, but it will take so much time and effort for me to beat you, given your incredible luck so far, and especially if it were to continue as it seems so wont to do…
-
So we agree i have won but we finish the game to satisfy your curiosity?
If DM had said a certain time frame, then yes. However, I’d still like to play it out to an actual conclusion. By that, I mean 2 allied capitols in axis hands or Berlin/Tokyo (either or) in Allied hands. That’s generally when games collapse instead of going to the bitter end.
And Gamerman, I have no idea what insanity you are refering to in “delusional”. I do think the Allies have plenty good chances of winning still, especially with the Germans gutted on the front lines. Japan can still suicide their air force and let Germany get Moscow, but it’s a pretty useless victory at that point, since they won’t have anything else on the map.
Suggested Topics
