Navigation

    Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    1. Home
    2. nikola1975
    N
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 27
    • Posts 3141
    • Best 27
    • Groups 0

    Nikola J

    @nikola1975

    30
    Reputation
    109
    Profile views
    3141
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Location Belgrade

    nikola1975 Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by nikola1975

    • RE: ANZAC planes on US carriers

      @taamvan

      Well, usually it will happen that you will have those fighters on US carriers, even without wanting to use it in this way. If Australia can earn around 15 - and usually that is what they can get until Japan is taking care of islands, India, China, Russia - they will buy a fighter every round or two. In order to be able to invest both in Europe and Asia, US can save some money by buying a fighter less. Effectively, if they buy a carrier and wait for two rounds, they are getting excellent defending power for 16 IPC.

      With those ANZAC fighters sitting on the US carriers, it is then opportunism - let them sit back near Australia coast and if an opportunity arises, go kill those transports.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: nikola1975 (axis +8) vs. simon33 (Allies) PtV

      @simon33 What do you mean? You wanted to land planes there and forgot?

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: ANZAC planes on US carriers

      @martin

      This combo is strong, not only due to colours, but because you really need to watch the whole Pacific - there is no safe place anymore for Japanese.

      But, we could create a thread with “nasty but legal tactics”, as you called it, @gamerman01.

      One that really made me angry was the fighter attack “over” the wall of ships. Let me explain. Germans were essentially locked in the Mediteranean, with my strong US fleet at Gibraltar. They had fighter on the carrier just inside Pillars of Heracles, launched the attack of a single sub to the whole US fleet of 20 ships, and on basis of that, were able to launch the fighter to sink 10 US transports, 3 sea zones away, at West Indies 🙂

      Something like this:
      d080735c-7e97-4ce4-a76c-0bc3c8f7913d-image.png

      The explanation was that the sub had tried to break through and if it would have succeeded (?!), the carrier could go through and take the fighter. I was seeing it as sending to a suicide mission - I was wrong obviously. 😢 🤕

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L21 PtV: 666 (allies) vs nikola1975 (axis+9)

      @666 This is getting difficult, everywhere 🙂 You are a very good player, putting units just where they have to be. Italians have to run away. Mare Nostrum? Seems not… Maybe they can help with getting back Atlantic wall though?

      I will try to make it fun for few more turns, maybe you make a mistake, somewhere, somehow… If not, I will try to prepare better for a next match.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: ANZAC planes on US carriers

      @gamerman01 Yes, I understand and agree. I think these are better suited for Pacific, because US fleet does not need to be offensive most of the time. At least not offensive in big battles, they can pick Japanese smaller groups around. When defending, Allied fighters will still shoot.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L21 PtV: 666 (allies) vs nikola1975 (axis+9)

      @666 I am surrendering this one. Well played!

      For a moment, it seemed I will be able to do something, but Germans were bogged too long in Russia, you surrendered territories, but just enough so I don’t get too much advantage too quickly.

      Japan could not deal with overwhelming naval force in Pacific unfortunately, it had to show on land. In Mediterranean, you played just as you should, UK planes were always in range of everything man 🙂 It was frustrating at times.

      Congratulations, I would love to play you again if you found this fun?

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: nikola1975 (axis +8) vs. simon33 (Allies) PtV

      @simon33 Do you want to turn around, you take Axis with +8?

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: PtV FlyingBadger (allies) vs Nikola1975 (axis +7)

      @flyingbadger I think transports can’t be defended from the carrier (it says “warships”, which transport is not)

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: PtV FlyingBadger (allies) vs Nikola1975 (axis +7)

      @flyingbadger What a carnage! Could be the biggest navy battle I fought.

      3 destroyers, 3 cruisers, 7 bombers and 1 fighter.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      @FlyingBadger wins, after 30 rounds and some big battles. Well played!
      PtV FlyingBadger (allies) vs Nikola1975 (axis +7)

      https://www.axisandallies.org/forums/topic/37263/ptv-flyingbadger-allies-vs-nikola1975-axis-7/467

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975

    Latest posts made by nikola1975

    • RE: L23 PTV Shin-Ji (Axis +8) vs Nikola1975 (Allies)

      @shin-ji

      triplea_39724_4uk.tsvg

      What do you mean by those bumps? Are you just impatient to play, or are you actually counting them for formal reasons? I hope we are both here for the same reason - to have fun.

      I would like to play more, but sometimes it’s not possible and I apologize that you sometimes wait for more than you would like to.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: 22L PTV playoff GeneralDisarray vs Nikola1975 (Ax+12)

      @generaldisarray Crap. Russians in Mediteranean. Didn’t see them.

      Scramble all, yes.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L23 PTV Shin-Ji (Axis +8) vs Nikola1975 (Allies)

      @shin-ji

      10 Chi inf.
      1 Bri inf.

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L23 PTV Shin-Ji (Axis +8) vs Nikola1975 (Allies)

      @shin-ji

      Hm, you are right.

      Anyway, good moves so far, you are extremely efficient fascist 🙂 It’s quite amazing that it is only round 4 and what you have achieved with Italians so far.

      triplea_39724_4rus.tsvg

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L23 PTV Shin-Ji (Axis +8) vs Nikola1975 (Allies)

      @nikola1975

      https://axisallies.com/global-1940-second-edition-rules/

      “Moving into a neutral territory is considered a combat move, and any combat must be resolved during the conduct combat phase (see ‘Combat Move‘). Before the neutral territory can be taken control of by the invading power, all of the neutral’s standing army units must be eliminated. Air units can’t fly over a neutral unless they are attacking it.”

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L23 PTV Shin-Ji (Axis +8) vs Nikola1975 (Allies)

      @shin-ji

      Hm, are you sure about that? I thought you are not able to fly over neutral territories.

      Can you check that?

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L2023 BM4 Giallo (All+15) vs Nikola1975 (ax)

      @giallo

      triplea_39641_12ita.tsvg

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: 22L PTV playoff GeneralDisarray vs Nikola1975 (Ax+12)

      @nikola1975

      G13.tsvg

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L23 PTV Shin-Ji (Axis +8) vs Nikola1975 (Allies)

      TripleA Turn Summary: French round 3

      TripleA Turn Summary for game: WW2 Path to Victory

      Game History

      Round: 3
      
          Purchase Units - ANZAC
              ANZAC buy 1 armour, 1 fighter and 1 mech_infantry; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 
      
          Combat Move - ANZAC
      
          Combat - ANZAC
      
          Non Combat Move - ANZAC
              1 cruiser moved from 31 Sea Zone to 27 Sea Zone
              1 transport moved from 31 Sea Zone to 27 Sea Zone
              1 destroyer moved from 31 Sea Zone to 27 Sea Zone
              1 aaGun, 1 artillery, 2 fighters and 6 infantry moved from Queensland to New South Wales
              1 infantry moved from Northern Australia to Queensland
              1 aaGun moved from Northern Australia to South Australia
              1 infantry moved from Northern Australia to South Australia
              1 fighter moved from Northern Australia to New South Wales
      
          Place Units - ANZAC
              1 armour, 1 fighter and 1 mech_infantry placed in New South Wales
      
          Turn Complete - ANZAC
              ANZAC collect 10 PUs; end with 10 PUs
              Objective ANZAC 3 Pacific Supply Lines: ANZAC met a national objective for an additional 3 PUs; end with 13 PUs
      
          Combat Move - French
              1 fighter moved from United Kingdom to 109 Sea Zone
              1 destroyer moved from 78 Sea Zone to 82 Sea Zone
      
          Non Combat Move - French
      
          Turn Complete - French
      

      Combat Hit Differential Summary :

      Savegame

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975
    • RE: L2023 BM4 Giallo (All+15) vs Nikola1975 (ax)

      @giallo

      triplea_39641_12jpn.tsvg

      posted in League
      N
      nikola1975