Cards for Axis and Allies 1940


  • Speaking of spies, you should make a card for Richard Sorge, Stalin’s master spy in Tokyo:

    “Sorge advised the Red Army on September 14, 1941, that the Japanese were not going to attack the Soviet Union until:
    1.Moscow was captured
    2.the size of the Kwantung Army was three times that of the Soviet Union’s Far Eastern forces
    3.a civil war had started in Siberia.
    This information made possible the transfer of Soviet divisions from the Far East, although the presence of the Kwantung Army in Manchuria necessitated the Soviet Union’s keeping a large number of troops on the eastern borders.
    Various writers have speculated that this information allowed the release of Siberian divisions for the Battle of Moscow, where the German army suffered its first tactical defeat in the war. To this end, Sorge’s information might have been the most important spy work in World War II.”

  • Customizer

    @dannyboy2016:

    So maybe the effects could be that, after the Germans have mapped out their combat phase the Soviets could play this card to receive a certain amount of reinforcements in one territory being attacked. This would be based on the rational that they learned about the attack before hand and secretly built up the area. That or the units would receive some sort of defensive bonus for the battle.

    The only problem I would have with this is it’s like giving Russia free units to represent those reinforcements.  Perhaps a better idea would be a free NCM of Russian units to the territory being attacked.  Like, say Russia has a lot of stuff in Moscow while the Ukraine or Rostov is being attacked.  Use this card and all those extra troops and tanks on Moscow, Stalingrad or wherever can move to defend Ukraine, Rostov or wherever the attack is happening.


  • @CWO Marc- I was thinking about adding Sorge, but I’m having trouble figuring out what his effects should be.  I wouldn’t want it to be something like forcing the Japanese not to attack the USSR or magically transferring all of the 18 Siberian infantry to Moscow. Maybe, if Germany is at war with the USSR and Japan isn’t then you could get some free reinforcements in Moscow to represent Siberian forces that were rushed there (including many tanks, which sadly aren’t in Holy Larry’s oob for Siberia).

    Do you have any ideas on what Sorge’s effects should be?

    @knp7765- That’s a good idea. It could work kind of like that Enigma Decoded British national advantage from the 2004 game except with a greater range for Soviet reinforcements to come in. Maybe any units within 3 or 4 spaces of the combat (and aren’t being attacked by land forces themselves) could be transferred to the battle, or conversely the Soviets could withdrawal all forces except one unit before the battle.


  • I’m doing some more revisions to that set of cards for the minors. I’ve decided to cut Maurice Gamelin, since his role in things is basically over during the first turn of the game. I’d like to replace him with a Free French commander. I’m trying to decide if it would be better to replace him with de Gaulle or Leclerc.

    From a benefit standpoint, both would probably give some sort of bonus to armor (not that the French will have many of those…). Leclerc commanded the 2nd armored division, and took part in the battle of the Falaise pocket as well as the liberation of Paris. As for de Gaulle, his successful tank attack against the Germans in Picardy was one of the few French successes in 1940. Plus he was an advocate of a professional army based on mobile tank and mechanized divisions. Unfortunately, his 1934 book on this topic sold way better in Germany than in France.

    I’m wondering if it’d be better to not include de Gaulle since he’s basically the Head of Government (post capitulation) and technically represented by the Free France card.

    Alternatively, I could use Resistance leader Henri Rol-Tanguy, but I think the French resistance is adequately covered in the vanilla French national objective. Plus, I’d like to use only free French commanders as the French commander cards.

    Any thoughts on this?


  • Just a little update. I’ll be taking an idea from coachofmany, and including a rank and skill for each of the commander cards, to allow for some more optional rules. For instance, if you were to use FMG’s units then the cards could be tied to a specific commander piece on the board. His rank would then determine the range of his effects (ie a Major General would just affect the territory he was in while a Field Marshal’s effects could cover an entire front). There could also be optional rules where, in the event of a battle, the commander with the higher skill level gets his bonus while the other commander may not use his.

    These would just be optional rules included in the big pdf when this project is ready.


  • I have a question for those interested in this project.

    I’m debating about whether or not I should include war criminals as cards. There are some individuals like Goring who, while sentenced to death for war crimes, played a major military role in the war. Others, like Speer, also had quite an effect on the German war effort. Thus I think that I should include some of the Nuremberg defendants as cards, even a few that were sentenced to death. With Japan, things are even tougher, because hundreds of Japanese were put to death for war crimes. I’d have practically no Japanese cabinet members or commanders to include if I discarded everyone executed or imprisoned as a war criminal.

    I tend to agree with Justice Radha Binod Pal, the Judge representing India at the Tokyo trials, that these proceedings were a case of victor’s justice. I feel that way about some of the Nuremberg defendants as well (though others like Frank, Frick, and Kaltenbrunner certainly earned their fate).

    Then there is the issue that several members of the Soviet State Defense Committee would be seen as some of the biggest criminals in history if the Nazis had never existed. I’m willing to overlook their crimes, given their importance to Stalin’s regime.

    There were also major corporations (like krupp) that used slave labor, but I think that they were too important to ignore despite these crimes against humanity.

    So I guess what I’m asking is who or what should be off limits? At the moment I’m just leaving out Unit 731, and people directly involved either in the holocaust (with the exception of Goring) or in the atrocious occupation policies in various conquered states. Should anything/one else be left off limits?

    Also, for the cards, I intend on using black and white historical pictures for each card. I’m not going to go out of my way to include swastikas in them, but if the best picture I can find for a card happens to have a swastika in it then I won’t shy away from using that either. Does that sound fair?


  • I really don’t think anything should be off limits. If someone is offended by something you make, then they can either choose to accept that even though they were horrible people, they did play a major part, and use your cards, or just not use your cards at all. That’s just my opinion though, and some people might object. I have no problem is what I guess I’m saying.


  • @otahere34:

    I really don’t think anything should be off limits. If someone is offended by something you make, then they can either choose to accept that even though they were horrible people, they did play a major part, and use your cards, or just not use your cards at all. That’s just my opinion though, and some people might object. I have no problem is what I guess I’m saying.

    Yeah, I think I’ll go with your advice. People could just not allow the specific card(s) that offend them. If, for example, a Ukrainian person is offending that I’ve included Kaganovich (he was involved in causing the Ukrainian famine in the 1930s), then they can just burn his card and use the rest of the set. Or ignore the set entirely.

    Since I’m (obviously) not going to include event cards/national advantages for committing atrocities, it probably won’t be a big deal to include cards of people who committed such acts. After all, if you are playing this game then someone is playing Hitler and Stalin anyway.


  • I agree with otahere34. you should not limit the cards for anything. what those people did was horrible but history is history and people who don’t like the cards having war criminals on them should realize that you can’t change history you can only remember it. if anyone doesn’t like them on the cards they should just take them out when they print them off.

    (also for a French military leader you should get a naval one because of all the navy France gets on the board) i am looking for one and will tell you when i find one


  • How about for a commander,Chief Marshal Dowding of the British.he decided to keep many air units in britian During and after Dunkirk to prepare British mainland defenses. he could give an extra plane in Britain if the  card is played the turn after France is taken. :?

    also can there be a card for the Italian Fascist militia and the communist conscripts. they would maybe be cards that cause inf to cost less for a turn or maybe cost less for the whole game and their defense is one less. :|

    -also maybe an event card to rep  the Russian recruitment of women in large numbers for skilled jobs like snipers, pilots for planes and tank


  • @Ghost:

    I agree with otahere34. you should not limit the cards for anything. what those people did was horrible but history is history and people who don’t like the cards having war criminals on them should realize that you can’t change history you can only remember it. if anyone doesn’t like them on the cards they should just take them out when they print them off.

    (also for a French military leader you should get a naval one because of all the navy France gets on the board) i am looking for one and will tell you when i find one

    Good, I’m glad people seem to be in general agreement about this. :)

    Darlan is an obvious choice for the French naval leader. At first he served Vichy France but he eventually defected to the allies only to be killed shortly thereafter. Paying 10 ipcs may reprsent persuading him to join the winning side.

    @Ghost:

    How about for a commander,Chief Marshal Dowding of the British.he decided to keep many air units in britian During and after Dunkirk to prepare British mainland defenses. he could give an extra plane in Britain if the  card is played the turn after France is taken. :?

    also can there be a card for the Italian Fascist militia and the communist conscripts. they would maybe be cards that cause inf to cost less for a turn or maybe cost less for the whole game and their defense is one less. :|

    -also maybe an event card to rep  the Russian recruitment of women in large numbers for skilled jobs like snipers, pilots for planes and tank

    Dowding will be in there (as will bomber Harris). The Russians will have a great patriotic war card that will give a one turn conscription bonus. Also they’ll have a chief of staff card that will permanently reduce the price of infantry by 1 ipc. I wan’t going to have a specific women card but I was thinking about using this pic for the Great Patriotic War.

    Re: Fascist militia, I’ll look into that.

    Oh yes, I’ve added a concept. Some of the cards will be chief of staff cards who give various bonuses (like the other commanders). You may only have one Chief of Staff in play at a time. You can hold onto a second chief of staff card, of course. Chiefs of staff wouldn’t be discarded if you switched them out (which you’d do at the start of a new turn). They’d go back to you hand but there should be some minor ipc cost for switching chiefs of staff so people don’t do it every turn.


  • Great :-D all that sounds good, i love the pic for the GPW. also if you have the time could you post an update list of the card types thanks :lol: and keep asking questions about our thoughts it is appreciated.


  • @Ghost:

    Great :-D all that sounds good, i love the pic for the GPW. also if you have the time could you post an update list of the card types thanks :lol: and keep asking questions about our thoughts it is appreciated.

    Revised Card Types

    Cabinet Ministers- Cabinet Members range from Civilian, Corporate, and Military figures who will aid the war effort in a variety of ways. Examples would include people like Albert Speer, Molotov, or George Marshall.

    Chief of Staff- The Chief of Staff is a special type of cabinet minister who gives a benefit to the entire military. While you may have many Chief of Staff cards in your hand, only one may be in play at a time. For 5 ipcs you may replace your existing Chief of Staff with another Chief of Staff card from your hand. The dismissed Chief of Staff card is not discarded. Rather, it returns to your hand. You never know if you’ll need to call on his services again.

    Commanders- Commander cards would be able to grant their special bonus to one battle per turn. So, General Chukov’s benefits could be used on both the German and Soviet turns but only during one battle in each of those turns. These cards’ benefits may stack, so you could have multiple commanders giving their unique benefits to a single battle. Commanders will have a skill level and rank for optional rules.

    Corporations- Corporations give various benefits to the war effort but are located in a specific territory. If that territory is captured you no longer gain the corporation’s benefits until you can liberate the territory. Examples would be Krupp, various Soviet Design Bureaus, or Chrysler.

    National Advantages- These cards would represent unique national advantages for the various nations that aren’t covered in the other types. A couple examples would be the Trans Siberian Railroad or Japanese banzai attacks.
    Puppets- These cards represent people like Vidkun Quisling or Pu Yi. They give a onetime bonus to the occupied territory that they are from and are then (usually) discarded.

    Puppets- These cards represent people like Vidkun Quisling or Pu Yi. They (generally) give a onetime bonus to the occupied territory that they are from and are then discarded.

    Special Events- Special Event cards would cover unique events in the war. For example the establishment of the Vichy Regime in France would count as a special event. A few “what if” events would be included, like the proposed Franco-British Union, or German the conquest of the Archangelsk to Astrakan line. Events will require certain parameters to be met before they may be played. After use these cards are discarded.


  • Soviet Chiefs of Staff
    For the Soviet Chiefs of Staff I’m using various individuals who were Chief of the General Staff of the Soviet Armed forces during Wartime. I’m also using a few people who had the position of People’s Commissar for Defence during the war. Some people who had these positions won’t be represented by a Chief of Staff card as they either served for too short a time or I’d prefer to use them as a regular commander.

    With Commander/Chief of Staff Cards, I’ll try to include a relevant quote from the individual in question.

    Boris Shaposhnikov

    “In any case, we will see a certain gradualism and advance steps in preparing mobilization in all spheres to a much greater degree than in 1914.”

    Effect: Infantry cost 1 ipc less.

    Joseph Stalin

    “In the Soviet Army, it takes more courage to retreat than advance.”

    Effect: Soviet infantry defend at +1 during the first cycle of Combat.

    SemyonTimoshenko

    “It is necessary to keep in mind the possibility of simultaneously conducting two, if not three, offensive operations of various fronts on a theater of war with the intention of strategically shaking the enemy’s entire combat capability as extensively as possible.”

    Effect: If the Soviet Union attacks three or more land territories during its turn then all German units defend at -1 during the first cycle of combat.

    Aleksandr  Vasilevsky

    “Our offensive on Kharkov demands that we not lose time and we commit all forces so that we can draw off as many divisions as possible.”

    Effect: Soviet tanks and Mechanized infantry have a move of 3, but still follow the normal blitzing rules.

    Kliment Voroshilov

    “Whoever can lift a rifle, should have one.”

    Effect: Soviet forces attack at +1 for all cycles of combat, but their casualties are doubled.


  • DB, This is great. I can’t wait to see the end result of all your hard work. This kind’ve reminds me of Risk Godstorm where cards can alter your strategies and the outcome of the game.


  • For the issues of German Chiefs of Staff I’m going to take people from the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (Supreme Command of the Armed Forces) as well as people from the Oberkommando des Heeres (the Army High Command). Despite the names, the OKH was basically independent of the OKW until a few days before the end of the war. Thus I’m considering the following individuals for the Chief of Staff cards for Germany:

    Wilhelm Keitel- Head of the OKW
    Alfred Jodl- Keitel’s deputy
    Reichsmarschall Hermann Goring- The Head of the Airforce (nominally under the OKW, had the highest rank in the German Military)
    Grossadmiral Erich Raeder- the Head of the Navy through 1943 (nominally under the OKW)
    Generalfeldmarschall Walther von Brauchitsch- Head of OKH through 1941
    Adolf Hitler- Head of the OKH through 1945
    General Franz Halder- Army Chief of Staff (under OKH head) from 1938 to 1942
    General Kurt Zeitzler Army Chief of Staff (under OKH head) from 1942 to 1944

    Grossadmiral Karl Donitz was in charge of the Navy after Raeder, and General Heinz Guderian followed Zeitler as Army Chief of staff. I’m uncertain about whether to include them as regular commanders or as Chief of Staff Cards. Would it be more fun for Heinz to be commanding an individual army (he got so close to Moscow, after all) or giving him an army wide bonus?

    The Guderian question is particularly vexing to me. I think he was a great commander, but I also think he was the best Chief of Staff that the army had. Plus, he basically invented Blitzkreig.

    Edit: Oh sweet, this was my 100th post. Now I’m an artillery piece. Bwahaha!

  • Customizer

    Whether or not any of the individuals that you use in these cards were accused/convicted of war crimes is irrelevant.  I know that the atrocities were a part of the actual history of WW2, but in Axis & Allies we don’t deal with that part.  We only deal with the military conflict.  So if these individuals participated in the military war effort, they should be included.

    Here’s another way to look at it;  in many of our games, the Axis win and take over the world.  So, in that case, there would be no Nuremburg trials.  Those individuals that were accused of war crimes in actual history instead would be hailed as heros of the Fatherland.  Remember, it’s the victors that write the history books.

    By the way dannyboy2016, love your artillery piece.  That’s the 800mm Gustav, right?


  • @knp7765:

    Whether or not any of the individuals that you use in these cards were accused/convicted of war crimes is irrelevant.  I know that the atrocities were a part of the actual history of WW2, but in Axis & Allies we don’t deal with that part.  We only deal with the military conflict.  So if these individuals participated in the military war effort, they should be included.

    Here’s another way to look at it;  in many of our games, the Axis win and take over the world.  So, in that case, there would be no Nuremburg trials.  Those individuals that were accused of war crimes in actual history instead would be hailed as heros of the Fatherland.  Remember, it’s the victors that write the history books.

    By the way dannyboy2016, love your artillery piece.  That’s the 800mm Gustav, right?

    Yeah, that’s my basic way of thinking about it. If a game like Hearts of Iron can have people like Heydrich, Kaltenbrunner, Himmler, and Frick in it as ministers then I don’t see a problem with including people like Speer, Goring, Keitel, Jodl, etc. And if someone is offended by a particular card for some reason then they can just not use the offending card.

    You are correct about victors writing the history. If Germany had won then “bomber” Harris would probably have been treated as a war criminal as would the vast majority of the Soviet government.

    Finally, yes that’s the Gustav. Did you know they were trying to build a self propelled version of that monster? Speer canceled the project because it was so obviously wasteful.


  • I’m going to be in San Francisco most of this week for work, but I intend to have a full list of soviet cards and effects posted next week. Any suggestions for the Soviet Union would be most appreciated. Here is the big list of planned Soviet cards so far

    CABINET CARDS

    Lavrenty Beria
    Lazar Kagnanovich
    Georgy  Malenkov
    Anastas Mikoyan 
    Vyacheslav Molotov
    Nikita Khrushchev
    Nikolai Voznesensky
    Andrei Zhdanov

    CHIEF OF STAFF CARDS

    Boris Shaposhnikov
    Joseph Stalin
    Semyon Timoshenko
    Aleksandr Vasilevsky
    Kliment Voroshilov

    COMMANDER CARDS

    Chuikov
    Konev
    Kuznetsov
    Novikov
    Rokossovskiy
    Zhukov

    CORPORATION CARDS

    Tula Arms Plant
    Uralvagonzavod Factory
    Ilyushin Design Bureau
    Tupolev Design Bureau
    Chelyabinsk Kirov Narkomtankprom Plant

    NATIONAL ADVANTAGES

    Black Sea Fleet
    JS 2 Heavy tank
    Katyusha Rockets
    Lucy Spy Ring
    Pacific Fleet
    Partisans
    Sharashka
    Richard Sorge
    Stavka
    Tank Guard Divisions
    Trans Siberian Railroad

    PUPPETS

    Kim Il-sung
    Khorloogiin Choibalsan
    Mao Zedong
    Josip Broz Tito

    SPECIAL EVENT CARDS

    General Winter
    Great Patriotic War
    Lend Lease USSR
    Not one Step Backwards
    Rasputitsa
    State Defense Committee

    Anything else you guys would want to see? I’d like to get Russia and the German set in stone first before moving on to the UK, US, Japan, Italy and then revising the minors.


  • @dannyboy2016:

    Maybe, if Germany is at war with the USSR and Japan isn’t then you could get some free reinforcements in Moscow to represent Siberian forces that were rushed there (including many tanks, which sadly aren’t in Holy Larry’s oob for Siberia). Do you have any ideas on what Sorge’s effects should be?

    The idea you’ve just described sounds pretty good.

Suggested Topics

  • 8
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 23
  • 3
  • 12
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

38

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts