@goldenbearflyer:
newpaintbrush, while ncscswitch thinks about that question, could I just interject and ask again, in what SZ do you typically place your UK trannies, SZ2 or SZ8?
Let us say you are playing rock, paper, scissors. Let us say that your opponent MUST show his choice before you have to choose.
Let us say that your opponent plays rock.
What do you choose?
But what if your opponent played paper instead?
Wouldn’t you choose something different?
And if your opponent played scissors, you would choose something yet again, wouldn’t you?
–
In the same way, Germany goes before UK, and my move is dependent on Germany’s move.
I haven’t played a game recently, but there are three things to do with the Allied fleet that I can think of offhand.
1. Unification west of Algeria, putting UK: 2 inf 2 arm, US: 2 inf 1 art 1 arm, possibly 1 fighter and/or 1 bomber. This depends on Germany’s build, combat movement, noncombat movement, and unit placement.
If, for example, Germany build transports in the Baltic, I would not want to drain London because of the risk of a G2 attack on London. If Germany sent its Mediterranean fleet west and landed air in range of the sea zone west of Algeria, I would not want to risk the Allied fleet (4 trns 1 destr 1 btl vs 1 trns 1 sub 5 fig 1 bomber is not good for the Allies). There are other conditions under which unification west of Algeria on UK/US1 is a bad idea. If Germany allows the Allies the opening, though, unification west of Algeria allows for early dispute of Africa (especially when combined with a UK1 retake of Anglo-Egypt).
2. Unification in the seazone southwest of London. This is really just a place for the Allied fleet to hang out, outside of range of the German navy and/or some of the German air force. This is a pretty standard response to any German play that threatens London; when the Allies unify their fleet southwest of London, the US portion of the fleet brings over the 2 inf 1 art 1 tank to London to help reinforce it. The Allies have two good options from this seazone; they can either hit Norway, or Algeria (if I remember correctly). It is difficult for Germany to really defend both; if Germany posts its fleets in a forward position to try to drive the Allies back, the Allies can instead attack the German navy.
This is standard against a very active German player. The problem with the German navy is that the Allies can just sit in this sea zone (or maybe it was one of the others, I forget), and wait for the German navy (either Baltic or Mediterranean) to retreat, or to get sunk (the Baltic navy can often be sunk pretty quickly if UK dumps IPCs on fighters early). Now the REALLY important part is this - if the Germans challenge the Allied fleet in any of the sea zones around UK, UK can EITHER attack like mad, barely wipe out the Germans, then pop out a carrier and then have the US move in reinforcing naval units. OR, the UK can attack like mad, wipe out most of the German fodder, retreat to a sea zone adjacent to London, pop out a carrier, and have the US move in to reinforce.
Or, the UK can just sit and wait for the threat to go away. How does the threat go away? UK fighters sink the Baltic fleet, so no more threat. (Alternative is if Germany buys more navy, but that in turn weakens Germany against Russia, which buys the Allies MORE lovely time). The German Med fleet has to be posted at least at S. Europe to threaten the Allied fleet off the west of Algeria, and all the key territories are east of that (the sea zone adjacent to Anglo-Egypt and Trans-Jordan, as well as the sea zone adjacent to Ukraine and Caucasus). So if the Germans DO stay close in the Med, that’s less pressure on Russia. Again, it’s not easy for the Germans.
3. Against a REALLY strong and early German naval threat, the Allies can be forced into full retreat (the sea zone northwest of UK, which is vulnerable to fighters based out of Norway). But really, all the Allies have to do is hang out and defend London. If Germany is spending like mad on navy, Russia gets very fat very fast, and in the meantime, the UK and US can build air forces the size of Big Momma. The air forces really aren’t all that useless either; after the air forces are blown up sinking the German navy, the air remnants can reinforce Moscow while Russia builds up a gigantic load of infantry, then the Allies can push out again.
–
All this sounds like an inevitable Allied victory. In my experience, though, that’s usually what happens with the Allies.
So - in short - where do I put my UK trannies?
If the Germans can blow up the UK trannies at little cost, I simply stick the UK trannies somewhere they can’t be blown up at little German cost. Why give the Axis a handout?
If the Germans have to pay through the nose to blow up the UK trannies, I just leave the UK trannies right there, where Germany can pay an arm and a leg to blow them up. I can always build more trannies, but German fighters are a real drain on Germany.