No scramble
L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
-
Japan is struggling a lot, but it’s still an interesting game. Germany have become a monster now after the glorious fall of Moscow.
-
I had moved 2 ANZAC ftrs to Java. Not sure how we should handle that. And I’m not sure why, but I was totally oblivious to the threat you posed to Queensland.
-
There were 2 aussie figs there.
-
@trulpen Yes, like I said, I didnt see the threat. I had moved a US bomber to Queensland. I had moved 2 ANZAC ftrs to Java to defend against threat from battleship. We were skipping countries and it was missed
-
Its not on the map you had to use
-
I’m sorry there was an overlook, but in the concept of skipping a nation is the opportunity to look at that nation during a following nation’s turn.
ANZAC had not moved anything in several turns. Perhaps a fig to the US navy once.
If I’d skipped over Russia as well, which I was almost about to do (didn’t look at Queensland either, but Sibiria), then you’d not had a chance to look at Queensland.
Not seeing a threat is a mistake that happens all the time. I do it plenty myself.
What do you mean it was a map I didn’t use? I used the one after your russian turn.
-
Ah, now I understand. You had moved 2 aussie figs to Java. Sorry, didn’t read that.
-
It can be handled.
Of course, I might have considered to attack the unsupported des then, but it’s complicated.
-
Would probably have gone in max in Queensland anyway, since it was essential to win that one.
-
There were a bit of troubles when posting Russia, so perhaps that’s why?
-
In the first battle round the 4 figs hit 2/4. I can roll for those and see if the 2 figs left hit or missed. Any miss would leave another inf for the next battle round, so would roll that @1.
In battle round 2 there were 3/4 hits and the method would be the same.
Only 2 fig left in battle round 3 and that would mean there actually were none, although they anyway hit 0/2. That one is perhaps a bit unfair. ;)
Maybe those two misses can count for one miss earlier sor something?
-
@trulpen sounds fair. You can add back any units that would have survived given 2 less ftrs.
-
Ok, I’ll do that. Think it’s fair that 2 figs less will count as one less hit (probability) on actual hits in round 1 and 2, still rolling for changed dice. Object if you oppose it. The changed dice would then be two rolls at 1/4 for round 1 and 2/4 for round 2.
-
Not sure about the fig adjustment, but I’ll go with it for now. This way things will be easily adjustable. I will base these rolled dice on the position of actual dice, so for the first roll there will be a hit on 4 (and if you oppose that fig adjustment, it would also be a hit on 3).
-
[dice 2d4]
-
2d4: 2, 1
-
Ok, in any case 2 misses.
I’ll roll 2d6@1 for round 2 because of 2 survived inf.
-
[dice 2d6<=1]
-
2d6<=1: 1, 2; Hits: 1
-
One hit. Then I have to check for 1d6@2 as well on the defense.
Beginning with the air. Checking first which dice will be annulled.
[dice 1d3]