Ok, my last post on this :-D
I’m not sure why it is so hard for people to see that:
A) The text is clear
B) The text is unambiguous
I understand you believe this doesn’t represent:
C) What the best rule is
D) What the author actually intended
I’m open to C, and I’d likely agree with D if I thought it was particularly relevant. But I’m not sure why it is apparently so utterly, terribly difficult for people to agree with A and B. The text says what the text says. There is no mystery in the wording. “Original owner” and “original controller” are surprisingly simple, comprehensible phrases.
The question was about what the rules state, not about what the rules should have stated, and not what the author intended to state. The text is the text, and the text is clear even if you think it is wrong.
Ok. Lots of other smart folks have opinions, so the floor is yours. I’ve said my bit.
Peace