Sorry, for some reason I was thinking you’d build 2 TRN in the Med and 3 in the Baltic.
Personally I’d rather put the AC in the Med though. Stay alive longer and enable the BB to be elsewhere when the TRN is built, and provides more fighter range into Africa.
Yes thats good. But the other idea is a balanced defensive fleet
in the baltic you got 1 cv, 2 fighters, 2 subs, 2 tranny, 1 destroyer= 20 points/8 hits ( except only 16 of these can hit planes)
in the medd you may have a BB, 3 tranny, and possible sub= 13 points/ 8 hits ( except that 11 of these can hit planes)
both fleets have 8 hits so in a way its balanced. If you dont build a CV in baltic that fleet is gonna die real soon.
Well I feel like I’ve learned a lot in this little back and forth. I’ll be watching that game of JSP’s with interest, with the 2 AC 1 TRN build- not sure what I’ll do (and wouldn’t say anyway with another tournament game about to start).
By the way, you seem to refer to TRN as AP - what’s that from?
USN ship abbreviations
AP = Transport
http://www.valoratsea.com/shipdes.htm
Mind, it would probably be more accurate to describe the “Transport” in the game as a APA or AKA.
I’d put the AC in the med as well Frood. I think even with the AC in the Baltic, your Baltic fleet will not last beyond B3…if that long. Unless you are prepared to sink even more into your navy.
USN ship abbreviations
AP = Transport
http://www.valoratsea.com/shipdes.htm
Mind, it would probably be more accurate to describe the “Transport” in the game as a APA or AKA.
Thank you sweet duck.
I was hoping somebody would catch on to that.
But AKA is also something else.
BB=battleship
CA= cruiser
DD=destroyer
SS=sub
CV=carrier
AP= transport
You can go hardcore
CL= light cruiser
DE=destroyer escort
CVL=light carrier
CE= carrier escort
BBAV= battleship/ carrier hybrid ( the two japanese battleships that were retrofitted with catapult seaplanes following Midway)
BBB= Dreadnought
BC=battlecruiser
BEst German buy is a nuke :evil:
Exto its nice to see you post like that… good ol’ Exto!
@AJGundam:
In my game vs Jsp he did a German opening of 2 ACs + 1 Trn and placed 1 AC in Baltic and 1 AC + 1 Trn in Med. Not far into the game but it will probably be interesting. Not far into the game but I will like to see how he intends to use it.
http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=8784.0
This is a strategy I’ve been wanting to try, but only in conjunction with a Russian opening of a WR attack only. Â The calculation is that with the bulk of German land forces in the East still intact, a G1 all Navy buy would be viable. Â We will see if that turns out to be true.
Problem though is that the bulk of Russia’s land forces are ALSO still intact - but we’ll see now…
CVs need planes to be useful and it is not obvious where JSP is gonna get those. If he takes them from the land forces, the Eastern Front will get real interesting.
Buying CVs with out the FTRs to fill them up is risker that I would do.
I’m kind of nervous about the game :lol:
If I lose it will make me look realy bad I think. Even though he murdered me in the past 2 games fairly quickly. I blame the dice :wink:
All right, based on all of this, I have formulated a master plan for my tourney game (got a bid of 7 to Libya). I won’t post it now though just in case JWW pops his head in here. I think it will be nasty though.
That is a healthy bid. Post the link to the game thread please. I’ll be interested to “watch” the game.
HMMMM My german 1 buy is 13-14 inf (if i won the bid)
My round 2 opponent took Axis with a bid of 10 in round 1. I was tempted to go for 8, which I got in round 1 and did decently with a 1 TRN -SZ 14 bid, but I figured he’d go lower this time.
Here’s the link: http://www.axisandallies.org/forums/index.php?topic=8827.0 I’m a little excited about my opening, we’ll see how it works. I’ll just say this - I don’t think it’s been suggested here yet, not in this exact form. It’s gonna be a little crazy, a little nuts, maybe stupid, maybe really nasty. Oh well, part of me would be relieved to be out of the tournament anyway.
I’ll follow along as time permits.
BTW, in reference to your signature, did you know that “Enders Game” is on the reading list for the US Navy?
I’ll follow along as time permits.
BTW, in reference to your signature, did you know that “Enders Game” is on the reading list for the US Navy?
That’s cool. Good book. Exciting but also makes you think. I’ve thought of changing my screen name here to Ender. I was always the shortest kid in my class.
@froodster:
I’ll follow along as time permits.
BTW, in reference to your signature, did you know that “Enders Game” is on the reading list for the US Navy?
That’s cool. Good book. Exciting but also makes you think. I’ve thought of changing my screen name here to Ender. I was always the shortest kid in my class.
ISn’t it a little childish for the navy? i didn’t personally like the book. ( had to read it over the summer did it in like 2 days :x )
Well it’s not Dostoevsky and yes it’s a quick read but still thought provoking. My wife likes it too (actually referred me to it), and she is not otherwise into SciFi or action or anything like that.
