Thank you! Seems like G2 is better than G3.
What do you want to be the next AA game?
-
I know that it will be a North Africa game because I am in the process of creating it myself. Just got the map and currently working up a list of units and values for D-12 dice.
You are creating it yourself?
Yes I am. Got the map from IronDukes post on House rules.
-
I’d like to see a World War I version called “Central & Entente”.
The board would be only from the Eastern US to Western Russia, and it would be England, France, and Russia vs. Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottomans. After a specified turn, Russia would drop out of the game and the USA would come into it.There would be only infantry, artillery, biplane/triplane fighters, battleships, cruisers, destroyers and U-boats.
Tanks, derigible bombers, and carriers would be techs, as would mustard gas.
The board would be as large as the combined Global 1940 game but would focus mainly on Europe, and use the basic A&A combat system.I’d totally ignore China and Japan and leave that whole side of the board off.
-
The board would be as large as the combined Global 1940 game but would focus mainly on Europe, and use the basic A&A combat system.
Ouch… that is gigantic for only involving Europe. I would think that if they were to do something like this, it would be smaller first. And then, as popularity dictates, develop into a larger game.
Still… a Global 40 size is ungodly for a WWI game.
-
I’d like to see a World War I version called “Central & Entente”.
The board would be only from the Eastern US to Western Russia, and it would be England, France, and Russia vs. Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottomans. After a specified turn, Russia would drop out of the game and the USA would come into it.There would be only infantry, artillery, biplane/triplane fighters, battleships, cruisers, destroyers and U-boats.
Tanks, derigible bombers, and carriers would be techs, as would mustard gas.
The board would be as large as the combined Global 1940 game but would focus mainly on Europe, and use the basic A&A combat system.I’d totally ignore China and Japan and leave that whole side of the board off.
Anyways that’s a great idea, but what about Italy do they get any type of rule, and the Balkans area. Also when would it start?
-
I’d like to see a World War I version called “Central & Entente”.
The board would be only from the Eastern US to Western Russia, and it would be England, France, and Russia vs. Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottomans. After a specified turn, Russia would drop out of the game and the USA would come into it.There would be only infantry, artillery, biplane/triplane fighters, battleships, cruisers, destroyers and U-boats.
Tanks, derigible bombers, and carriers would be techs, as would mustard gas.
The board would be as large as the combined Global 1940 game but would focus mainly on Europe, and use the basic A&A combat system.I’d totally ignore China and Japan and leave that whole side of the board off.
I assume you also have transports; otherwise a navy is mostly useless
-
-
I’d like to see a World War I version called “Central & Entente”.
The board would be only from the Eastern US to Western Russia, and it would be England, France, and Russia vs. Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottomans. After a specified turn, Russia would drop out of the game and the USA would come into it.There would be only infantry, artillery, biplane/triplane fighters, battleships, cruisers, destroyers and U-boats.
Tanks, derigible bombers, and carriers would be techs, as would mustard gas.
The board would be as large as the combined Global 1940 game but would focus mainly on Europe, and use the basic A&A combat system.I’d totally ignore China and Japan and leave that whole side of the board off.
I assume you also have transports; otherwise a navy is mostly useless
Otherwise UK’s useless almost, and the US when they join.
-
I would love to have Larry do a WWI game. But to make things interesting, give the game political rules like diplomacy. Now that game could be so much fun.
-
I would love to have Larry do a WWI game. But to make things interesting, give the game political rules like diplomacy. Now that game could be so much fun.
I thought he denied it, on his forum before?
-
@Dylan:
I would love to have Larry do a WWI game. But to make things interesting, give the game political rules like diplomacy. Now that game could be so much fun.
I thought he denied it, on his forum before?
He did, but I would still love for him to do one. I can dream I guess….
-
@Dylan:
I would love to have Larry do a WWI game. But to make things interesting, give the game political rules like diplomacy. Now that game could be so much fun.
I thought he denied it, on his forum before?
He did, but I would still love for him to do one. I can dream I guess….
Well I know this not what you want, but I’ve been thinking of a sequal of my Napoleonic Wars game, which will most-likely suck.
-
@i:
as long as germany get the panzer 3! 8-)
All Axis and Allies tanks for Germany are Panzer’s
-
@i:
well i want the panzerkamowagon III! as aposed to the panzerkampwagonIV or V(panther)or VI(tiger) or VII(tiger2) or VIII(maos) :x
panzer III is cooler looking IMHO.They look the same, they are just tanks with long shooting range.
-
end this madness now! STAY ON TOPIC!!(ironic is’ent it) beet you to it il
Have you became Imperious Leader’s bitch, because you called him lame on an earlier post.
-
My vote goes for a North Africa campaign game.
-
I haven’t enjoyed the battle-specific games as much as the theater-level and global-level games. I think it would be cool to take A&A into a different time period. A&A:WWI, A&A: Seven Years War, or A&A:Napoleon?
-
KURSK
-
AA Star Wars.
-
@Brain:
AA Star Wars.
Republic & Empire!! R&E
-