Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. oysteilo
    • Profile
    • Following 4
    • Followers 3
    • Topics 85
    • Posts 11,993
    • Best 317
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 12

    oysteilo

    @oysteilo

    2026 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15

    437
    Reputation
    913
    Profile views
    12.0k
    Posts
    3
    Followers
    4
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Location Sarpsborg, Norway. 59°17'8"N 11°6'54"E

    oysteilo Unfollow Follow
    2026 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15

    Best posts made by oysteilo

    • RE: League General Discussion Thread

      Just a couple of more comments. I think we all understand the need for clear guidelines when it comes to playoffs. If you only have played BM and then in the playoffs are drawn against someone who insists on OOB it comes across as unfair. That is certainly a valid point. But you can also argue the other way too and especially since the rule sates OOB is default. I think we need to update the rules! But how??

      The argument to the majority is that no one plays OOB, so it doesn’t matter if you allow it in the regular season if they, the majority, are not required to play it in the playoffs. To me this is meaningless and borderline selfish. There is no motivation to play OOB in regular league play if you are required to play BM in the playoffs. That is a sure death penalty to OOB competitive play. Is that what the League wants?

      The only solution I see is to have three leagues, one for OOB, one for BM and one for PtV. Then we avoid all arguments about what to play. If no one wants to play OOB then that league will die after a season or two, but the OOB could also get revitalized, I think. Really it is not that much work to record results for different games in different ranking sheets. I really don’t see why it is a problem. Nothing prevents people from playing all three leagues if they like. Also, if we are worried about no one playing OOB you may remove the 8 games cap for playoffs and introduce a 3 or 4 game rule.

      I also think a solution like this will make it easier to keep all players at this site. We desperately need every single player! If everyone gets to play what they want even for the playoffs its easier to keep players too. I think players in many situations are “forced” to play BM because “everyone” wants that, and they feel expected to.

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: Post League Game Results Here

      Yeah, obviously this game got out of hand. I have played trulpen too and I don’t think he is unfair. HOWEVER, he is KING of EDITS and that is not so good all the time. With that said he also allows you many edits. I think edits should be kept to a minimum… and not so much after next post. Sometimes this becomes a fine line.

      Personally I only bump if I really mean to, bumps should never be used if you only intend to “activate” the game. A bump is a bump. Periode.

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: League General Discussion Thread

      @OwenToo said in League General Discussion Thread:

      Maybe when someone signs up for the playoffs, they state which playoff they want to be in. And there can be three playoffs: OOB, BM3, and PTV

      I think that is a good compromise. You may even sign up for more than one too!?

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: G40 Balance Mod - Feedback Thread

      All:

      After several years of playing BM (on and off) I am interested in hearing peoples view on marines. Are they useful? Do they add something to the game?

      I struggle with finding how to use them.

      Honestly one of the best purpose I have found is to buy with Russia before german DOW just to distract germany so they cant leave land open.

      It may be usefull to buy with Japan and take guam and it also may make a differance against an early assault on India.

      For the USA it it may make sense to buy on the east coast and put on the cruiser there (maybe the best use I think)

      In the pacific it sounds cool because you can island jump and claim several undefended japanese islands, but in reality it does not work because your cruiser (or battleship) is very volunerable for counter attacks.

      For the british i have found no or little use for marines, may be useful in special situations where you have several cruisers, but keep in mind 3 cruisers require 15 IPC which is eq. to a transport and inf +art and you get to keep the tranny

      For italy? I have little input. Very rearly a lonely cruiser can enter open sea in the med. It needs to be protected by the fleet, then it may make sense.

      Anzac: I have never bought a marine with ANZAC

      So, in summary I find it useful for some nations in the early game, but I hardly ever, or never, buy a marine past round 2

      (sorry for the spelling)

      posted in Other Axis & Allies Variants
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: Tutor game: AndrewAAGamer (X) vs trulpen [and everyone else] (A+50) OOB

      for a 50 bid. I would take:

      British
      Scotland: 1 fighter
      Sz 110, 91 and 98: 1 sub each
      sz 71: 1 transport
      Egypt: 1 infantry

      China
      Yunnan: 1 inf

      Anzac
      sz 62: 1 sub
      New Guinea: 1 inf

      The China and sz 62 bid is to discourage a J1 attack. J1 attack is extremely powerful when playing OOB version

      posted in Play Boardgames
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: League General Discussion Thread

      its not a bad idea to have different caps for different games. It may make much sense to put the cap at 8 for BM and for example 4 at OOB.

      I anticipate the die hard BM folks want nothing left behind and want the 8 game cap, its fine. Then OOB could serve as an alternative. AND it should be possible to participate in BM and OOB playoffs given you have enough games. I think it is important not to exclude people though

      I dont play PtV so I have no input there

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: Allies cannot lose.

      @Panzer-V , @M36

      I am happy to play global 1940 2nd ed. I take axis and you take allies, no bid

      pm if interested

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: Axis & Allies .org 2024 Support Drive

      yeah, I hope to receive my 2024 badge sonn. I donated 60 bucks in july sooooo…@djensen

      posted in Website/Forum Discussion
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: The new ELO-based ranking system

      For the OOB ranking most top players are not active. It should be a tool to filter away the non active players to achieve a current/up to date ranking of active players. How do ido that? If you were great in 2014, 16 and 17 and havent played a game since, then, I dont care what your ranking is

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: Axis Hail marry

      If you want to help euro axis with japan a better plan (I think) is to secure India with japan and from there (or Malaya) go for South Africa. South Africa is usually less defended than Egypt and hence it is easier to capture with less resources, maybe a couple of transports are enough together with a loaded carrier and a destroyer. A yellow south africa is a pain to deal with for allies

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo

    Latest posts made by oysteilo

    • RE: OOB Playoffs R2 oysteilo (axis) vs. AndrewAAGamer (+51)

      TripleA Manual Gamesave Post: Germans round 1

      TripleA Manual Gamesave Post for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition

      Game History

      Round: 1
      
          Purchase Units - Germans
              Turning on Edit Mode
              EDIT: Adding units owned by British to 111 Sea Zone: 1 submarine
              EDIT: Adding units owned by British to Scotland: 1 fighter
              EDIT: Adding units owned by British to 91 Sea Zone: 1 submarine
              EDIT: Adding units owned by British to 98 Sea Zone: 1 submarine
              EDIT: Adding units owned by Chinese to Yunnan: 1 infantry
              EDIT: Adding units owned by Russians to Russia: 1 fighter
              EDIT: Adding units owned by Russians to Volgograd: 1 fighter
              EDIT: Turning off Edit Mode
      

      Combat Hit Differential Summary :

      Savegame

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • OOB Playoffs R2 oysteilo (axis) vs. AndrewAAGamer (+51)

      UK: $28
      Fighter Scotland
      SS 111, 91, 98
      Russia: $20
      Fighter Russia, Volgograd
      China: $3
      Infantry Yunnan

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: L25 G40 OOB Oysteilo (L+55) v Jacob16 (X) Game 1

      1 aa, 6inf, 1 mech, 3 art. If you continue for round 2 ask again

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: L25 G40 OOB Oysteilo (L+55) v Jacob16 (X) Game 1

      @oysteilo said in L25 G40 OOB Oysteilo (L+55) v Jacob16 (X) Game 1:

      max defense, aa, inf, mech, art and armor

      since you have not been online since i posted this I am now reconsidering my OOL. I will give final orders later today so hold on for now

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: L25 G40 OOB Oysteilo (L+55) v Jacob16 (X) Game 1

      max defense, aa, inf, mech, art and armor

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: L25 G40 OOB Oysteilo (L+55) v Jacob16 (X) Game 1

      How is this coming along?

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: oysteilo and mikawagunichi vs crockett36 & Stucifer team Gamerman's setup

      TripleA Turn Summary: Japanese round 5

      TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 2nd Edition

      Game History

      Round: 5
      
          Purchase Units - Japanese
              Japanese repair damage of 7x factory_major; Remaining resources: 49 PUs; 4 SuicideAttackTokens; 
              Japanese buy 1 destroyer, 7 infantry and 5 mech_infantrys; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 4 SuicideAttackTokens; 
      
          Combat Move - Japanese
              1 mech_infantry moved from Kweichow to Yunnan
              1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 bombers, 1 fighter, 4 infantry and 3 tactical_bombers moved from French Indo China to Yunnan
              1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Philippines to Yunnan
              2 fighters and 2 tactical_bombers moved from 35 Sea Zone to Yunnan
              2 fighters moved from Shantung to Yunnan
              1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 42 Sea Zone to Yunnan
              1 infantry moved from Dutch New Guinea to New Guinea
                    Japanese take New Guinea from ANZAC
              1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Java to 42 Sea Zone
              1 artillery, 1 infantry and 1 transport moved from 42 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
              1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from 37 Sea Zone to Malaya
              1 battleship moved from 42 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
              1 battleship moved from 45 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
              1 submarine moved from 19 Sea Zone to 18 Sea Zone
              1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Manchuria to 19 Sea Zone
              2 fighters moved from Manchuria to 18 Sea Zone
              1 carrier and 1 destroyer moved from 42 Sea Zone to 55 Sea Zone
              2 cruisers moved from 35 Sea Zone to 55 Sea Zone
              1 destroyer moved from 45 Sea Zone to 37 Sea Zone
      
          Combat - Japanese
              Battle in Malaya
                  Japanese attack with 1 artillery and 1 infantry
                  British defend with 1 infantry; UK_Pacific defend with 1 harbour
                      Japanese roll dice for 2 battleships in Malaya, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 1.33 expected hits
                      UK_Pacific roll dice for 1 infantry in Malaya, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
                      1 infantry owned by the British lost in Malaya
                  Japanese win, taking Malaya from UK_Pacific with 1 artillery and 1 infantry remaining. Battle score for attacker is 3
                  Casualties for British: 1 infantry
              Battle in 55 Sea Zone
                  Japanese attack with 1 carrier, 2 cruisers and 1 destroyer
                  ANZAC defend with 1 destroyer
                      Japanese roll dice for 1 carrier, 2 cruisers and 1 destroyer in 55 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/3 hits, 1.33 expected hits
                      ANZAC roll dice for 1 destroyer in 55 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
                      1 destroyer owned by the ANZAC lost in 55 Sea Zone
                  Japanese win with 1 carrier, 2 cruisers and 1 destroyer remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8
                  Casualties for ANZAC: 1 destroyer
              Battle in 18 Sea Zone
                  Japanese attack with 2 fighters and 1 submarine
                  Americans defend with 1 destroyer
                      Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 18 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
                      Japanese roll dice for 2 fighters in 18 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/2 hits, 1.00 expected hits
                      Americans roll dice for 1 destroyer in 18 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
                      1 destroyer owned by the Americans lost in 18 Sea Zone
                  Japanese win with 2 fighters and 1 submarine remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8
                  Casualties for Americans: 1 destroyer
              Battle in Yunnan
                  Japanese attack with 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 bombers, 7 fighters, 4 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 7 tactical_bombers
                  British defend with 2 aaGuns, 3 artilleries and 10 infantry
                      British roll AA dice in Yunnan : 0/6 hits, 1.00 expected hits
                      Japanese roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 bombers, 7 fighters, 4 infantry, 1 mech_infantry and 7 tactical_bombers in Yunnan, round 2 : 11/23 hits, 11.33 expected hits
                      Chinese roll dice for 2 aaGuns, 3 artilleries and 10 infantry in Yunnan, round 2 : 5/13 hits, 4.33 expected hits
                      4 infantry owned by the Japanese and 1 mech_infantry owned by the Japanese lost in Yunnan
                      2 aaGuns owned by the British and 9 infantry owned by the British lost in Yunnan
                      Japanese roll dice for 1 armour, 1 artillery, 2 bombers, 7 fighters and 7 tactical_bombers in Yunnan, round 3 : 10/18 hits, 10.33 expected hits
                      Chinese roll dice for 3 artilleries and 1 infantry in Yunnan, round 3 : 2/4 hits, 1.33 expected hits
                      1 fighter owned by the Japanese and 1 artillery owned by the Japanese lost in Yunnan
                      3 artilleries owned by the British and 1 infantry owned by the British lost in Yunnan
                  Japanese win, taking Yunnan from Chinese with 1 armour, 2 bombers, 6 fighters and 7 tactical_bombers remaining. Battle score for attacker is 22
                  Casualties for Japanese: 1 artillery, 1 fighter, 4 infantry and 1 mech_infantry
                  Casualties for British: 2 aaGuns, 3 artilleries and 10 infantry
              Battle in 19 Sea Zone
                  Japanese attack with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber
                  Americans defend with 1 destroyer
                      Japanese roll dice for 1 submarine in 19 Sea Zone, round 2 : 1/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
                      Americans roll dice for 1 destroyer in 19 Sea Zone, round 2 : 0/1 hits, 0.33 expected hits
                      1 destroyer owned by the Americans lost in 19 Sea Zone
                  Japanese win, taking 19 Sea Zone from Americans with 1 fighter, 1 submarine and 1 tactical_bomber remaining. Battle score for attacker is 8
                  Casualties for Americans: 1 destroyer
      
          Non Combat Move - Japanese
              1 fighter and 3 tactical_bombers moved from Yunnan to 36 Sea Zone
              2 carriers moved from 35 Sea Zone to 36 Sea Zone
              1 fighter and 1 tactical_bomber moved from 19 Sea Zone to Japan
              2 fighters moved from 18 Sea Zone to 6 Sea Zone
              2 fighters moved from 6 Sea Zone to Japan
              1 infantry moved from Chahar to Hopei
              1 infantry moved from Hopei to Kweichow
              2 infantry moved from Anhwe to Kweichow
              1 infantry moved from Shantung to Anhwe
              4 fighters and 1 tactical_bomber moved from Yunnan to French Indo China
              3 tactical_bombers moved from Yunnan to French Indo China
              2 bombers moved from Yunnan to French Indo China
              1 fighter moved from 36 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
              2 carriers moved from 36 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
              3 tactical_bombers moved from 36 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
              2 transports moved from 42 Sea Zone to 35 Sea Zone
              1 fighter moved from Yunnan to French Indo China
              1 transport moved from 45 Sea Zone to 55 Sea Zone
      
          Place Units - Japanese
              1 destroyer placed in 6 Sea Zone
              5 infantry placed in Japan
              2 infantry and 1 mech_infantry placed in French Indo China
              3 mech_infantrys placed in Kwangtung
              1 mech_infantry placed in Shantung
      
          Turn Complete - Japanese
              Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 3
                  Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 6 Sea Zone. Rolls: 1,2
              Japanese collect 50 PUs (3 lost to blockades); end with 50 PUs
              Objective Japanese 4 Control Dutch East Indies: Japanese met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 55 PUs
      

      Combat Hit Differential Summary :

      Chinese regular : 1.33
      Americans regular : -0.67
      Japanese regular : -1.00
      British AA : -1.00
      ANZAC regular : -0.33
      UK_Pacific regular : -0.33
      

      Savegame

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: oysteilo and mikawagunichi vs crockett36 & Stucifer team Gamerman's setup

      @oysteilo said in oysteilo and mikawagunichi vs crockett36 & Stucifer team Gamerman's setup:

      There is something that does not look right in mongolia. Ulaanbataar can not turn american. I think the mongolians should be pro allies now afer the axis attack on the neutrals. And technically I think the americab mech can activate Ulaanbataar, but the territory will turn soviet and the infantry will be red. I dont have a lot of experience with this situation, but I think this is right

      It appears it is okay as it is and I am incorrect above

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: oysteilo and mikawagunichi vs crockett36 & Stucifer team Gamerman's setup

      There is something that does not look right in mongolia. Ulaanbataar can not turn american. I think the mongolians should be pro allies now afer the axis attack on the neutrals. And technically I think the americab mech can activate Ulaanbataar, but the territory will turn soviet and the infantry will be red. I dont have a lot of experience with this situation, but I think this is right

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo
    • RE: oysteilo and mikawagunichi vs crockett36 & Stucifer team Gamerman's setup

      sorry. I am up :) I have overlooked it

      posted in League
      oysteiloO
      oysteilo