Hey Major,
I’m in EST. I can play almost anytime since I’m retired. Just let me know when you’re available and we can get going.
Pictures of Pacific 1940 Box Art
-
Gotta love the artwork again- nice job!!!
What color tan will the Australians be? Same rust color as the Italians in AA50???
I’m ordering 3 copies. :-)
check that… make it four…I wanna rip people off on e-bay when it sells out 30 days after release! :-D
-
China fields more forces than ever before,
Seriously, who writes these things?! The amount of forces they can field are increased 50%, but the number they can build is increased 100% WOW!
That would be more, wouldn’t it?
Australia and New Zealand, joined together as the ANZAC forces, represent a new playable ally. China fields more forces than ever before, but will need help from their allies – the United States and England – to withstand the might of expansionist Imperial Japan.
apparently Anzac is represented, but not needed to be able to help against Japan…
I doubt that ANZAC will be helping China much. They’ve got their own problems.
-
I doubt that ANZAC will be helping China much. They’ve got their own problems.
ugh, I sense a damsel in distress…… :-P
-
China fields more forces than ever before,
Seriously, who writes these things?! The amount of forces they can field are increased 50%, but the number they can build is increased 100% WOW!
That would be more, wouldn’t it?
sorry Krieg, the problem with the terminology is that it implies you get, I don’t know, MORE THAN ONE NEW UNIT for China! But that’s just not the case here is it? No, you get Infantry and Artillery. Should be no surprise then when people complain about the game. This stuff just sets it up for failure. Like Larry talking up the ‘refreshed’ sculpts and then we find them only on the country we never buy ships with and everything else is the same. Yeah!…
on a slightly connected note, any chance you could pass along to the wizards over yonder that they can move AA42 off of the “Upcoming” list and into something like “Now Available”?
@Krieghund:Australia and New Zealand, joined together as the ANZAC forces, represent a new playable ally. China fields more forces than ever before, but will need help from their allies – the United States and England – to withstand the might of expansionist Imperial Japan.
apparently Anzac is represented, but not needed to be able to help against Japan…
I doubt that ANZAC will be helping China much. They’ve got their own problems.
problems like, hmmmm…… Japan maybe. But no, guess they won’t be helping out much there huh? After all, in AAP40 the Soviets are NOT in the game right? so who else is ANZAC gonna fight in a 4-player game with the US/UK and Japan?
-
China fields more forces than ever before,
Seriously, who writes these things?! The amount of forces they can field are increased 50%, but the number they can build is increased 100% WOW!
That would be more, wouldn’t it?
sorry Krieg, the problem with the terminology is that it implies you get, I don’t know, MORE THAN ONE NEW UNIT for China! But that’s just not the case here is it? No, you get Infantry and Artillery. Should be no surprise then when people complain about the game. This stuff just sets it up for failure.
You’re reading more into the terminology than what’s there. “More forces” simply means a larger army, as in a larger number of units. It doesn’t mean “more unit types”.
Like Larry talking up the ‘refreshed’ sculpts and then we find them only on the country we never buy ships with and everything else is the same. Yeah!…
Refreshed sculpts means that each unit’s mold was redone. The result is a sharper mini with better detail. Compare them with the Anniversary pieces and you’ll see the difference.
on a slightly connected note, any chance you could pass along to the wizards over yonder that they can move AA42 off of the “Upcoming” list and into something like “Now Available”?
I’ve been told that they have their hands full with the new message boards. They’ll get to it eventually (maybe).
Australia and New Zealand, joined together as the ANZAC forces, represent a new playable ally. China fields more forces than ever before, but will need help from their allies – the United States and England – to withstand the might of expansionist Imperial Japan.
apparently Anzac is represented, but not needed to be able to help against Japan…
I doubt that ANZAC will be helping China much. They’ve got their own problems.
problems like, hmmmm…… Japan maybe. But no, guess they won’t be helping out much there huh? After all, in AAP40 the Soviets are NOT in the game right? so who else is ANZAC gonna fight in a 4-player game with the US/UK and Japan?
Obviously ANZAC will fight Japan, which will indirectly help all the Allies. However, it will have enough to do defending itself, so it won’t be in a position to aid China directly, as the US and UK may be.
-
You’re reading more into the terminology than what’s there.
Right before the statement about China’s “more forces” is talk about the new unit types, then ANZAC. Clearly the line of thought for the whole paragraph directs one to think new units. And besides, the entire game is the “biggest” AA game ever according to Larry and the next paragraph. Wouldn’t that mean that every country has “more forces”? Why then would someone point out that just China gets “more forces”?
I can’t believe you wrote the above statement and then went through arguing all those details! Here’s my response. You’re reading more into the terminology than what’s there.on a slightly connected note, any chance you could pass along to the wizards over yonder that they can move AA42 off of the “Upcoming” list and into something like “Now Available”?
I’ve been told that they have their hands full with the new message boards. They’ll get to it eventually (maybe).
dude, that response is so worth the +1! (+182)
-
Right before the statement about China’s “more forces” is talk about the new unit types, then ANZAC. Clearly the line of thought for the whole paragraph directs one to think new units.
The sentence about tactical bombers and mechanized infantry introduces new unit types. The following sentence about ANZAC introduces a new playable power. The next sentence about China indicates that China will have “more forces”, i.e. it will be more formidable militarily. Each sentence is on a different topic. There is no pattern of “new units” there, clear or otherwise.
And besides, the entire game is the “biggest” AA game ever according to Larry and the next paragraph. Wouldn’t that mean that every country has “more forces”? Why then would someone point out that just China gets “more forces”?
Yes, every country has more forces. However, China is a bigger power relative to the others than ever before.
I can’t believe you wrote the above statement and then went through arguing all those details!
Those “details” were logical support for my response. Perhaps I didn’t clearly present it as such, so I’ll rephrase my supporting argument:
The phrase “more forces” indicates more units, plain and simple. It makes no claim as to what types those units will consist of. To infer more than that is to read too much into the statement. -
It’s anybody’s guess.
-
who writes these things?!
I get it Krieg. You wrote it didn’t you or at least were in on it? Never have I seen you be so adamant about something before. Ok, I take it all back. It’s gonna be a beautiful game!
“I do believe he doth protest too much!” -rough translation-
-
No, I didn’t write it. Someone in the Wizards marketing department did, no doubt.
-
Riiiiiiight.
In that case someone needs to explain proper grammar to ‘someone’ at AH, and how paragraphs deal with the same topic, so when someone changes topics they are to start a new paragraph.
-
You’ve been around here long enough to know better than that. Or at least that you should know better.
-
Enough of the negative waves. Look at the pictures of the game again and take great joy that you will have another great game in your collection soon!
-
@Brain:
Enough of the negative waves. Look at the pictures of the game again and take great joy that you will have another great game in your collection soon!
OddBall reference?
-
You got it. Kelly’s Heroes is one of my all time faves.
-
Krieg, It isn’t that I don’t what the release meant and it isn’t that I don’t understand the way AH writes stuff and even supports the products that Larry and you make, sadly, I understand all too well. What I was trying to point out was what was implied in the release. There is a big difference between what is implied and what is meant there and for many people they just won’t grasp the differences because they haven’t been around.
It is a customer issue. When customers expect something from a product and what they believe they were supposed to get, and then don’t, then you have angry customers on your hands. Simply telling them that they are wrong will not help, it only makes them more discontent, with the product and the salesperson/company/etc.
Take for instance that the release cites AA50, well, since that was a limited run that is over, and they can’t even get the rules from the AH website, citing that as the basic framework for the new game really means little to many people who are thinking about spending $80ish (American) for a game. They can compare it to AAP, and they see the Australian forces now simply being renamed as ANZAC, which doesn’t truly make them a new power, and they know what China had before and now will see only artillery as new pieces, but they thought it was much more.
Truly I point out these things not to just throw the ‘negative waves’ out there because that is the opposite of what I want to be doing. (the avatar doesn’t just look nice, eh). I’ve enjoyed these games for many, many years and it’s sad to see customers turned against companies, (maybe not so much AH, but you and Larry) because of poor advertising and support when they shoot themselves in the foot. I have dealt with customers for years and have picked up a thing or two about business and people. They may not always apply, but sometimes yes. Lose the customers’ trust, you lose the customers and I don’t think that there is a certainty that this demographic is busting at the seams in growth.
-
i think you should head over to the WOTC website and file your complaints. i dont think krieghund has anything to do with the marketing of the games or how they are advertised. I for one am thankful for everything krieghund does do for us, i.e. give us info on new games, explaining rules, and so on. all these issues are not on him, they are on Wizards
-
We need a whipping boy on this forum. just kidding krieg
-
Someone in the Wizards marketing department did, no doubt.
yea another chimp…
-
LuckyDay,
As I’ve tried to make clear in the past, I don’t work for Avalon Hill. I work for Larry Harris. As such, I have nothing to do with the planning or marketing of A&A games, only their development. However, my offiicial position does lead to the perception in others that I have some stake in defending the behavior of WotC. Believe me, I don’t. I agree that their marketing and support of A&A products in general is lacking, and I have said so on many occassions. This is my personal opinion, and should not be construed as the official opinion of Harris Game Design.
On the other hand, in this particular instance, I don’t think they’ve done anything wrong. I disagree with your assessment of the statements in the Pacific 1940 material. It is my personal opinion that there is nothing misleading about those statements, and that you have simply read too much into them. I have explained my reasoning previously. Please don’t feel that anyone at WotC is telling a customer that they’re wrong. It’s just me, expressing my opinion as a private citizen. If I have led you to believe otherwise, I regret it.
I do agree with you, however, that using the Anniversary game as a basis of comparison was a poor choice. Using the 1942 edition would have been a much better one, as it is the new “flagship” product and will be far more widely distributed.
By the way, the Australian forces aren’t simply being renamed. ANZAC is a separate, playable power.
Suggested Topics
