Wheatbeer (axis) vs vance (allies) G40 A3

[Guest]

OK so for that first roll I will lose 2 destroyers, 3 cruisers, 1 carrier, 1 tac, 1 ANZAC fig.  That makes 9 I think.

[wheatbeer]

SZ36

A 2 sub, 2 dest, 2 cru, 2 damaged bsh, 7 fig, 5 tact, 3 damaged carrier, 2 carrier

Rolls: 4@2 2@3 2@4 7@3 5@4; Total Hits: 144@2: (1, 3, 1, 3)2@3: (4, 4)2@4: (2, 6)7@3: (6, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3)5@4: (1, 3, 1, 1, 3)

D 2 carrier, 4 fig

Rolls: 2@2 4@4; Total Hits: 22@2: (5, 5)4@4: (2, 5, 6, 3)

[wheatbeer]

no need for OOL for round 2 … that was overkill

[Guest]

LOL

[wheatbeer]

sz36 cwol
2 bsh damaged , 5 carrier damaged

[wheatbeer]

NCM:
4 fig, 2 tact SZ36 >> kwa
3 fig, 3 tact SZ36 >> ksi
3 fig, 3 tact yun >> ksi
1 dest SZ6 >> SZ36
1 aa gun kwe >> yun
2 mech, 1 tank ksu >> yun
1 strat sik >> kwa

Mobilize:
2 sub, 1 dest SZ19
2 inf, 2 fig jap

Collect 51 IPC

wheatbeer vs vance 4cJapan.AAM

[Guest]

….and I can’t even remember why I staged everything off Wake instead of Midway.

USA 4

PURCHASE & REPAIR
6 Bmb
save 5
77 total

COMBAT MOVES
SBR Japan
4 Bmb from Western US
1 Bmb from Wake
AARolls: 5@1; Total Hits: 25@1: (5, 1, 3, 5, 1)

Iwo Jima (1 inf)
6 inf, 3 art, 1 mech, 2 armor from Wake via 6tt z31 to z17
bombard with 4 carriers, 1 battleship
bombardRolls: 4@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 24@3,: (1, 4, 6, 5)1@4: (1)
aRolls: 2@1, 6@2, 2@3; Total Hits: 32@1,: (6, 4)6@2,: (5, 5, 2, 3, 3, 6)2@3: (1, 1)
dRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (6)

z36 revenge
1 sub from z45
aRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)
dRolls: 2@1, 3@2, 7@2, 2@4; Total Hits: 62@1,: (2, 5)3@2,: (6, 5, 5)7@2,: (2, 1, 2, 4, 5, 3, 1)2@4: (3, 4)

[wheatbeer]

I was a little confused.  But even at Midway, I would have blocked SZ16 unless you built a naval base.

[wheatbeer]

I probably would have attacked SZ36 no matter what the US did just to make sure none of those planes could reinforce Russia or naval units threaten Italy.

[wheatbeer]

If you want a rematch, by the way, I am certainly willing to play as Axis again.

[Guest]

Frig, I also just realized I can’t reach you with those bombers. I can hit the sea zone, but not the mainland.  I guess the SBR is off.  Apologies.

Oh well let’s see how it goes another round or so (although I think i just lost this game).

NONCOMBAT MOVES
z17
Fleet from z31

z20
1 destroyer from z45

z35
1 destroyer fom z46

z6
1 destroyer from z25

Wake
4 bmb from Western US

MOBILIZE UNITS
6 Bmb in Western US

COLLECT INCOME
USA4=51(territories) +20(NOs) -0(comvoy damage) +5 saved = 76 IPCs

wheatbeer vs vance 4dUSA.AAM

[Guest]

China 4

PURCHASE & REPAIR
4 inf
save 4
14 total

COMBAT MOVES
Shensi (walk in)
1 inf from Szechuan

Kweichow (walk in)
1 inf from Szechuan

MOBILIZE UNITS
4 inf in Suiyuyan

COLLECT INCOME
CHINA4 = 7(territories) +2 saved = 9IPCS

wheatbeer vs vance 4eChina.AAM

[Guest]

UK4

PURCHASE & REPAIR
2 inf
6 total

COMBAT MOVES
Burma (walk in)
2 inf from India

Sumatra (swim in)
1 inf from West India via tt z79 to z41

Korea (swim in)
2 inf, 1 art, 1 armor from Hawaii via 2 tt z26 to z6
The Canadian army conquers Korea!

Italian Somaliland (walk in)
1 armor from Sudan

NONCOMBAT MOVES
z6
1 cruiser from z26

z76
2 transports from z79

Ethiopia
2 inf from Sudan
1 mech from Egypt

Egypt
1 inf from Sudan

INdia
2 inf, 3 art, 1 fig, 1 tac from West India

West India
2 inf from East Persia

COLLECT INCOME
UK pacific 4 = 13(territories) +0(NOs) -0(convoy damage) = 13IPCs

wheatbeer vs vance 4fUK.AAM

[Guest]

forgot to place my 2 inf!

wheatbeer vs vance 4fUK.AAM

[wheatbeer]

You should know Japan could have scrambled, but I’ll let it slide since you could have brought in the cruiser and strat during combat and I might not have scrambled with even odds when losing Korea is inevitable.

[wheatbeer]

Italy 4

Buy (31/31)
2 fig
1 tact

CM:

SZ76
1 strat ALX

BAL
1 inf epl

BEL
1 inf epl

NUKR
1 inf epl

EGY
2 inf alx load trans SZ98 unload egy
1 inf, 1 art trj load trans SZ98 unload egy
2 cru, 1 bsh SZ98 bombard egy
2 fig, 1 strat alx
2 fig, 1 tact sita

[wheatbeer]

sz76 cwol
bal, bel, nukr twol

EGY

aa fire

Rolls: 3@1; Total Hits: 03@1: (3, 5, 5)

[wheatbeer]

EGY

A 3 inf, 1 art, 4 fig, 1 tact, 1 strat, 2 cru, 1 bsh

Rolls: 2@1 2@2 4@3 2@4 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 72@1: (5, 2)2@2: (2, 4)4@3: (2, 2, 2, 1)2@4: (4, 6)2@3: (6, 4)1@4: (1)

D 4 inf, 1 aa gun

Rolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 34@2: (4, 1, 2, 1)

[wheatbeer]

NCM:
1 strat SZ76 >> syr
2 fig, 1 tact egy >> trj
2 fig, 1 strat trj >> syr
1 tank syr >> irq (activate 3 inf)
1 mech, 1 tank tun >> tob
1 art more >> alg
3 inf, 2 art, 1 tank, 2 aa gun epl >> nukr

Mobilize:
2 fig, 1 tact sita

Collect 26 + 15 (3 main NOs) + 2 (IRQ NO) = 43 IPC

wheatbeer vs vance 4gItaly.AAM

[Guest]

Oh yeah Korea was an amphibious assault, so that makes it an attack on z6 too (i.e. the naval battle).  That’s a fine point and good to know. Thanks

Italy at 43 uggghhhh.

ANZAC 4

PURCHASE & REPAIR
1 transport
save 9
16 total

COMBAT MOVES
none

NONCOMBAT MOVES
z44
1 sub from z34

MOBILIZE UNITS
1 transport in z62

COLLECT INCOME
ANZAC4 = 14(territories) +0(NOs) -0(convoy damage) +9 saved = 23IPCs

FRANCE does nothing. Go germany

wheatbeer vs vance 4hANZACFrance.AAM