G40a3.9 MrGreen(axis) vs SethTheNewt(allies)

[Mistergreen]

Still need an ool…  :-)

Pdf is to large, need your email if you want it, otherwise you should be able to find it online somewhere…

[seth4god]

@Mistergreen:

“The movement of air units are completely unaffected by canal or straits wheter they are moving over land or sea.”

Want me to attach the pdf?

Yes, but I want to see what my USN killed first  :-P

[seth4god]

@seththenewb:

Lose dds, you took away my friendly landing space.  :x

You mean this?  :roll:

[Mistergreen]

Oh missed your ool defense coming up:

D(2 dd, cv, cc, 2 fig)
Rolls: 3@2 1@3 2@4; Total Hits: 33@2: (1, 2, 4)1@3: (5)2@4: (5, 1)

[seth4god]

@Mistergreen:

“The movement of air units are completely unaffected by canal or straits wheter they are moving over land or sea.”

I still maintain you’d have to violate neutrality for that bmb to take part in any can opening. It’s a dead horse anyway seeing as how both the bmb and the arm are now safely dead.  :evil:

[Mistergreen]

sz99 holds with cv, cc, 2 fig. 2 fig retreat.

ncm coming up but no more ool if you wish to sleep…  :-)

I still maintain you’d have to violate neutrality for that bmb to take part in any can opening.

It’s possible. Better check the rules forum then…  :-)

[Mistergreen]

ncm:
2 fig sz99 > sita
cv, 4 trn, 2 German fig sz98 > sz97
7 inf, 3 art trj > egy

placement:
2 dd > sz97
3 inf > egy
2 inf > nita

collect:
20+5+1=26 ipc

mrgVseth09gItaly.AAM

[seth4god]

@Mistergreen:

It’s possible. Better check the rules forum then…� :-)

What do the rules say about neutral territories and violations? I’ve checked online and the only rulebook upload I found was a megaupload which has since been blocked by the government. I’ll check the faq and rules section, because I know I read it at some point . . . or at least I think I do which isn’t always the same thing.

[Mistergreen]

It says you can’t fly over a unfriendly neutral (unless attacking it) and that strictly neutral works like unfriendly neutral except that when attacked all strictly neutral gang up on you.

Still need to check the rules forum but I’m beginning to think you may have been spot on…

[Mistergreen]

But it seems you was incorrect…
http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=9031

Still need your email if you want the pdf…

[Mistergreen]

Have fun with your weekend warrior thingy, since you needed to pack and report in I suspect you indicated you’ll be training as a reservist in the army, not the going out and getting smashed at the weekend definition of weekend warrior…

…a definition that could fit some in college…  :-)

[seth4god]

Anzac T9
purchase inf, ftr

com
none

ncm
ftr nze > nsw
2ftr nze > sz26
ss sz 63 > sz26
ftr sz80 > ind

[seth4god]

place inf, ftr nsw
collect 10

sz54 convoy raid (ss)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (1)

sz62 convoy raid (ss)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 01@3: (5)

sz63 convoy raid (ss)
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)

[seth4god]

3 ipcs convoyed

France T9
inf lib > tob
dd sz39 > sz80

ends France turn

Convoy Raid against syr (ca, 2ftr)
Rolls: 5@3; Total Hits: 35@3: (1, 2, 6, 1, 4)

[seth4god]

map

mrgVseth09hF.AAM

[seth4god]

Yeah, I’m in the National Guard. So yeah, unfortunately no partying through most of the weekend.  :wink:

[Mistergreen]

The Japanese sub captains just remembered they got a second torpedo tube.

cd sz54:
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)

cd sz62:
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (1)

[Mistergreen]

I’ll deduct another two ipc when I do Germany.

[Mistergreen]

5 ipc total for Anzac.

Germany 10:

bank=66
20 inf@3=60
arm@6

cm:
2 inf, tac(4) nov > arch(inf)
inf, fig, tac(4) nov > bel(inf)
51 inf, 12 art sukr > ros(inf)

bry(inf)
inf nukr
fig, tac(3) nov

sz99(cv, cc, 2 fig)
2 fig(3) sz97
tac(3) sita
2 fig(2) wgr
bmb(2) nov

sz99 rd1:
A(4 fig, tac, bmb)
Rolls: 4@3 2@4; Total Hits: 44@3: (1, 6, 5, 2)2@4: (1, 4)
D(cv, cc, 2 fig)

ool?

[Mistergreen]

With 4 hits there is no need for ool…

sz99 rd1:
D(cv, cc, 2 fig)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3 2@4; Total Hits: 31@2: (1)1@3: (6)2@4: (3, 1)