3cf1c2a1-1b21-4b5f-a07f-30225f34df39-uk.tsvg
eec5b1b8-ec73-455a-9061-c13698c68e6b-anz.tsvg
48419014-468d-4641-9974-69e0a59683e2-triplea_42321_2dut.tsvg
bry hw inf. Oh well no 22% can opener as icing on the cake. :roll:
syr rd1:
A(2 inf, art)
Rolls: 1@1 2@2; Total Hits: 01@1: (6)2@2: (4, 4)
D(mech)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)
sz99 rd1:
A(cv, ss, 2 dd, cc, 2 fig)
D(4 dd, cv, cc, 2 fig)
Rolls: 5@2 3@3; Total Hits: 25@2: (6, 5, 1, 4, 2)3@3: (6, 4, 5)
sz99 rd2:
A(cv(d), 2 dd, cc, 2 fig)
Rolls: 2@2 3@3; Total Hits: 22@2: (3, 4)3@3: (3, 2, 5)
D(2 dd, cv, cc, 2 fig)
ool?
Only one inf removed, 2 inf, bmb lost to evil Brits. You got me uncertain if air can use straits, well worth checking up for the future…
I’m like 99% on that one. You could fly directly from sz98 > sz81 or sz91 > sz92 just fine because everyone’s at war with each other and/or it’s friendly. But Turkey is neutral and I don’t think they’d be pleased with you violating their airspace or their territorial (that strait is A LOT narrower than 12 miles) waters. It’s worth checking just to have kreig’s blessing though and/or prove me wrong.
syr rd2:
A(2 inf, art)
Rolls: 1@1 2@2; Total Hits: 11@1: (4)2@2: (2, 3)
D(mech)
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
sz99 rd1:
A(cv, ss, 2 dd, cc, 2 fig)
D(4 dd, cv, cc, 2 fig)
Rolls: 5@2 3@3; Total Hits: 25@2: (6, 5, 1, 4, 2)3@3: (6, 4, 5)
You just rolled my ftrs at 3, so there should’ve been one more hit. Reroll for rd2 only
@seththenewb:
You just rolled my ftrs at 3, so there should’ve been one more hit. Reroll for rd2 only
I just noticed that your dds didn’t hit, so you could just remove one dd and go from there.
Doh :roll:
I was going to reroll with the cv lost but not counting result better than two, but this is even better :)
Cv goes down, ool?
In the Europe rules page 9, read the last line regarding canal and straits…
Lose dds, you took away my friendly landing space. :x
In the Europe rules page 9, read the last line regarding canal and straits…
Is the europe rulebook online somewhere? That’s the only way I have the Pac rulebook and A3.9
I’m curious about what that passage says.
“The movement of air units are completely unaffected by canal or straits wheter they are moving over land or sea.”
Want me to attach the pdf?
Still need an ool… :-)
Pdf is to large, need your email if you want it, otherwise you should be able to find it online somewhere…
“The movement of air units are completely unaffected by canal or straits wheter they are moving over land or sea.”
Want me to attach the pdf?
Yes, but I want to see what my USN killed first :-P
@seththenewb:
Lose dds, you took away my friendly landing space. :x
You mean this? :roll:
Oh missed your ool defense coming up:
D(2 dd, cv, cc, 2 fig)
Rolls: 3@2 1@3 2@4; Total Hits: 33@2: (1, 2, 4)1@3: (5)2@4: (5, 1)
“The movement of air units are completely unaffected by canal or straits wheter they are moving over land or sea.”
I still maintain you’d have to violate neutrality for that bmb to take part in any can opening. It’s a dead horse anyway seeing as how both the bmb and the arm are now safely dead. :evil:
sz99 holds with cv, cc, 2 fig. 2 fig retreat.
ncm coming up but no more ool if you wish to sleep… :-)
I still maintain you’d have to violate neutrality for that bmb to take part in any can opening.
It’s possible. Better check the rules forum then… :-)
ncm:
2 fig sz99 > sita
cv, 4 trn, 2 German fig sz98 > sz97
7 inf, 3 art trj > egy
placement:
2 dd > sz97
3 inf > egy
2 inf > nita
collect:
20+5+1=26 ipc
It’s possible. Better check the rules forum then…� :-)
What do the rules say about neutral territories and violations? I’ve checked online and the only rulebook upload I found was a megaupload which has since been blocked by the government. I’ll check the faq and rules section, because I know I read it at some point . . . or at least I think I do which isn’t always the same thing.
It says you can’t fly over a unfriendly neutral (unless attacking it) and that strictly neutral works like unfriendly neutral except that when attacked all strictly neutral gang up on you.
Still need to check the rules forum but I’m beginning to think you may have been spot on…