Rolls: 57@1 44@3 2@4; Total Hits: 3057@1: (2, 5, 4, 3, 5, 4, 2, 4, 6, 6, 5, 1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 4, 2, 4, 6, 4, 5, 2, 2, 1, 1, 6, 3, 5, 4, 5, 3, 3, 4, 2, 4, 2, 3, 6, 6, 1, 4, 3, 3, 2, 6, 6, 6, 2, 3)44@3: (5, 5, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 6, 5, 6, 3, 4, 3, 6, 1, 4, 3, 3, 1, 3, 2, 1, 1, 4, 3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 5, 6, 6, 4, 1, 1, 4, 3, 2, 4, 2, 1, 6, 5, 3)2@4: (6, 5)
@discalced said in L26 Tincanofthesea (L +46) vs. Discalced (X):
for this J3 combat, you have unprotected transports in SZ43. You also have land units in Borneo. I moved a fighter and a cruiser into SZ43. I want to use the fighter to attack the unprotected transport, and the cruiser to conduct a coastal bombardment. I believe this is possible?
TripleA asks “do you want to attack transports?” and if I respond “Yes” then it uses both the fighter and the cruiser to attack. But I only want to use the fighter, so that the cruiser can conduct the bombardment.
Assuming this aligns with the rules, and TripleA has a technical limitation that prevents it, can I just remove the transport (since it would be killed by fighter) and use the cruiser to bombard?
I don’t think what I wanted to do is possible based on the rules. Seems like any unit present in a sea zone must participate in a naval battle. I moved the cruiser out before combat.
