Also, SZ33 has 4 US figs on 2 CVs, and 1 Anzac fig on a US CV
L22 #1 trulpen (X+6) vs max334 (A) P2V
-
Wanted to attack the cr in z117.
Roll it here.
-
Attacking with 1 des, 1 cr, 1 bs, 2 ac.
[dice 1d6<=2]
[dice 1d6<=3]
[dice 1d6<=4]Defence
[dice 1d6<=3]
-
1d6<=2: 5; Hits: 0
1d6<=3: 4; Hits: 0
1d6<=4: 3; Hits: 1
1d6<=3: 5; Hits: 0 -
-
Decide to land a tac in WG instead of Rome. Sorry for all the changes, but I’ve not been able to sleep tonight.
-
l22-1-trulpen-vs-max334-p2v R10.tsvg
I guess the Battle Calculater cant give you accurate probabilities in the kind of battle we had in sz35. Would one of my DD’s have made a huge difference or only a minor one? I’m still not fully cognizant of the dynamics there -
I think the battle calculator is usually pretty accurate, but in some cases it’s not. Like with subs or carriers that can’t be soaked.
I would have scrambled in the battle for Yaroslavl, but never got a request. I’ll redo the battle for you here. Unless you forgot about the scramble option and just carried on. You still want to do that battle?
-
I’ll work on the J-turn while waiting for your answer. Actually, I’ll just set up a similar battle somewhere on the map and then edit the outcome. More stringent than rolling in here.
-
@trulpen I’m not understanding. Where are u talking about?
-
By Leningrad. There’s an ab there and I have 2 fig, 1 tac.
-
@trulpen its not adjacent to Leningrad
-
Ah, my bad. I thought it was, but you’re right.
-
@trulpen ok, give yourself a reprocution for that
-
Not sleeping might have something to do about it…
-
@trulpen you weren’t sleeping when you took out the Mediteranean fleet. Maybe you should have told me to put another sub and DD in there
-
I was obviously sleeping when you took out the Med fleet. :)
-
Very tricky turn for Japan. On the brink of collapse.
-
Took the wrong casualties in z7. Meant to sink 1 sub and dmg 1 ac. Will restart it with those corrections.
-
The result was 2 dmg ac.
-
Go back and finish the old battle, but disregard that result. Edit to adjust.





