Wheatbeer (axis) vs vance (allies) G40 A3
-
hon twlo 1 inf
NCM:
1 fig, 1 tact sui >> kan
1 fig, 1 tact tsi >> kan
1 sub, 1 dest, 2 carrier SZ20 >> SZ6
4 fig hon >> SZ6
2 fig, 1 tact amu >> jap
2 tact amu >> SZ6
3 tact anh >> SZ6
2 strat jap >> kan
2 sub, 4 dest, 2 cru, 2 bsh, 1 carrier, 2 fig SZ36 >> SZ19
2 trans SZ5 >> SZ6
1 tank bury >> cmo
1 inf, 1 art sak >> bury
1 aa gun amu >> man
2 inf cha >> sui
1 trans SZ6 >> SZ17 load 1 inf iwo >> SZ6 unload japMobilize:
4 inf, 2 art jap
1 carrier SZ6
2 mech, 1 tank manCollect 57 IPC (59 total)
-
Don’t forget my scramble and kamikaze options before rolling (I sense naval clashes coming :-P ).
-
No need for that just yet.
USA 4
PURCHASE & REPAIR
3 armor
3 inf
1 bmb
2 tac
1 carrier
save 1
77 totalCOMBAT MOVES
Iwo jima
1 art from Midway via tt z25 to z17z19 (2 subs, 4 destroyers, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 2 battleships, 2 fig)
2 subs, 2 destroyers, 1 cruiser from z45
4 Bmb from Midway
a
Rolls: 4@2, 1@3, 4@4; Total Hits: 54@2,: (3, 3, 2, 6)1@3,: (1)4@4: (3, 2, 6, 1)
d
Rolls: 2@1, 5@2, 2@3, 4@2; Total Hits: 22@1,: (4, 6)5@2,: (1, 3, 6, 3, 6)2@3,: (6, 6)4@2: (3, 1, 5, 3) -
You damage 2 battleship, 1 carrier; lose 2 subs, figs land on Kansu
If you would do something else, please adjust before I do UK’s turn because I am going to attack you there with UK and ANZACI lose 2 subs, retreat to z21
NONCOMBAT MOVES
Guam
4 Bmb from battle in z19Western US
1 tac from Midway
3 inf, 1 armor via 2tt z25 to z10z17
1 destroyer, 2 cruisers, 2 battleships, 3 carriers, 3 fig from z25MOBILIZE UNITS
3 armor, 3 inf, 1 Bmb in Western US
1 carrier, 2 tac in z10COLLECT INCOME
USA 4 = 53(territories) +25(NOs) -0(NOs) +1 saved = 79IPCs -
You rolled my battleships and fighters @2 not @4. If you stick with this roll, there were two 3s rolled which would have also been hits.
I will definitely be using my kamikazes against the UK. If you bring in your entire UK fleet from SZ45 I will use 1 kamikaze roll against each destroy, 1 for the cruiser, and 1 for a carrier. If you don’t go full fleet, then it’ll depend what you bring.
My OOL would not be to damage the carrier. I would damage both battleships, sink 2 subs, and sink 1 destroyer.
-
ugh another typo. Sorry. OK I will lose 2 more destroyers there, park the fighters on Kiangsu.
-
No wait I read that wrong. the fighters stay on the carrier.
-
UK 4
PURCHASE & REPAIR
Europe
1 carrier
1 destroyer
save 5
29 totalPacific
3 armor
save 3
21 totalCOMBAT MOVES
z109 (1 sub)
1 destroyer in z109
4 fig from UK
a
Rolls: 1@2, 4@3; Total Hits: 41@2,: (2)4@3: (1, 3, 2, 5)
d
Rolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (6)z19 (3 destroyers, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 2 fig, 2 damaged battleships)
1 sub, 4 destroyers, 1 cruiser, 1 fig, 1 battleship from z45
a
Rolls: 5@2, 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 45@2,: (3, 5, 2, 1, 4)2@3,: (1, 6)1@4: (4)
d
Rolls: 4@2, 2@3, 4@4; Total Hits: 34@2,: (6, 6, 4, 6)2@3,: (1, 2)4@4: (5, 3, 6, 5) -
you lose 3 destroyers, 1 cruiser
I damage battleship, lose 1 sub, 1 destroyerz19 2
a
Rolls: 3@2, 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 23@2,: (6, 3, 6)2@3,: (5, 2)1@4: (3)
d
Rolls: 1@2, 1@3, 4@4; Total Hits: 41@2,: (5)1@3,: (1)4@4: (3, 2, 3, 6) -
you lose 1 cruiser, 1 battleship
I lose 3 destroyers, 1 cruiserz19 3
a
Rolls: 1@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3,: (6)1@4: (4)
d
Rolls: 1@2, 3@4; Total Hits: 01@2,: (5)3@4: (6, 5, 6) -
you lose second fighter (both battleships remain)
z19 4
a
Rolls: 1@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 01@3,: (5)1@4: (5)
d
Rolls: 1@2, 2@4; Total Hits: 11@2,: (3)2@4: (1, 5) -
I will lose the battleship and stop there
NONCOMBAT MOVES
z21
2 carriers from z45 (one carries ANZAC fighter)
1 fig from battle in z19
1 fig, 1 tac from Northern territoryGuam
1 inf, 1 art from Dutch New Guinea via tt z45 to z21UK
1 inf, 1 art, 1 armor from Quebec via 2tt z106 to z109
2 fig from battle in z109MOBILIZE UNITS
1 carrier, 1 destroyer in z109
3 armor in IndiaCOLLECT INCOME
Convoy raid Scotland (1 sub) plus assume 1 for transjordan cuz I don;t want to type all that
Rolling 2d6:
(2, 3) -
UK Europe = 30(territories) +0(NOs) -3(convoy damage) +5 saved = 32IPCs
UK Pacific = 7(territories) +0(NOs) -0(convoy damage) +3 saved = 10IPCs
-
Hey, this whole battle needs to be redone. I don’t mean to be picky … but I told you earlier that I intended to use my kamikazes.
-
If you’re attacking with 1 sub, 4 dest, 1 cru, 1 fig, 1 bsh, then I would roll 1 kamikaze at each surface ship.
-
aww dammit; I’m sorry. For some reason I had it in my mind that you meant z6 for the kamikaze’s, which doesn’t even make sense because the UK ships couldn’t reach z6! I’m not trying to screw up your game, it’s me being scatterbrained.
OK here is that battle redone:
z19 Kamikazes
destroyers
a
Rolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 04@2: (4, 5, 6, 6)
cruiser
a
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
battleship
a
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4) -
OK that was crummy so I am going to reroll those kamikazes
z19 Kamikazes
destroyers
a
Rolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 34@2: (1, 3, 2, 2)
cruiser
a
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
battleship
a
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2) -
z19 (3 destroyers, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 2 fig, 2 damaged battleships)
1 sub, 1 destroyer, 1 cruiser, 1 fig, 1 damaged battleship from z45a
Rolls: 2@2, 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 32@2,: (3, 3)2@3,: (3, 1)1@4: (3)
d
Rolls: 4@2, 2@3, 3@4; Total Hits: 44@2,: (1, 6, 2, 1)2@3,: (4, 6)3@4: (5, 5, 3) -
I missed a roll for 1 batleship
d
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (3) -
OK her is the map with that battle done correctly (I hope). I really am sorry for screwing that up. It was not intentional.
Also, in the USA attack on z19, the reason I thought you would land your fighters on land was that you might want to save the fighters to defend Japan. As it turns out, your decision was better because now the UK fleet is down to 1 carrier.





