Wheatbeer (axis) vs vance (allies) G40 A3

[Guest]

No need for that just yet.

USA 4

PURCHASE & REPAIR
3 armor
3 inf
1 bmb
2 tac
1 carrier
save 1
77 total

COMBAT MOVES
Iwo jima
1 art from Midway via tt z25 to z17

z19 (2 subs, 4 destroyers, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 2 battleships, 2 fig)
2 subs, 2 destroyers, 1 cruiser from z45
4 Bmb from Midway
aRolls: 4@2, 1@3, 4@4; Total Hits: 54@2,: (3, 3, 2, 6)1@3,: (1)4@4: (3, 2, 6, 1)
dRolls: 2@1, 5@2, 2@3, 4@2; Total Hits: 22@1,: (4, 6)5@2,: (1, 3, 6, 3, 6)2@3,: (6, 6)4@2: (3, 1, 5, 3)

[Guest]

You damage 2 battleship, 1 carrier; lose 2 subs, figs land on Kansu
If you would do something else, please adjust before I do UK’s turn because I am going to attack you there with UK and ANZAC

I lose 2 subs, retreat to z21

NONCOMBAT MOVES
Guam
4 Bmb from battle in z19

Western US
1 tac from Midway
3 inf, 1 armor via 2tt z25 to z10

z17
1 destroyer, 2 cruisers, 2 battleships, 3 carriers, 3 fig from z25

MOBILIZE UNITS
3 armor, 3 inf, 1 Bmb in Western US
1 carrier, 2 tac in z10

COLLECT INCOME
USA 4 = 53(territories) +25(NOs) -0(NOs) +1 saved = 79IPCs

wheatbeer vs vance 02 4dUSA.AAM

[wheatbeer]

You rolled my battleships and fighters @2 not @4.  If you stick with this roll, there were two 3s rolled which would have also been hits.

I will definitely be using my kamikazes against the UK.  If you bring in your entire UK fleet from SZ45 I will use 1 kamikaze roll against each destroy, 1 for the cruiser, and 1 for a carrier.  If you don’t go full fleet, then it’ll depend what you bring.

My OOL would not be to damage the carrier.  I would damage both battleships, sink 2 subs, and sink 1 destroyer.

[Guest]

ugh another typo.  Sorry.  OK I will lose 2 more destroyers there, park the fighters on Kiangsu.

[Guest]

No wait I read that wrong.  the fighters stay on the carrier.

[Guest]

UK 4

PURCHASE & REPAIR
Europe
1 carrier
1 destroyer
save 5
29 total

Pacific
3 armor
save 3
21 total

COMBAT MOVES
z109 (1 sub)
1 destroyer in z109
4 fig from UK
aRolls: 1@2, 4@3; Total Hits: 41@2,: (2)4@3: (1, 3, 2, 5)
dRolls: 1@1; Total Hits: 01@1: (6)

z19 (3 destroyers, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 2 fig, 2 damaged battleships)
1 sub, 4 destroyers, 1 cruiser, 1 fig, 1 battleship from z45
aRolls: 5@2, 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 45@2,: (3, 5, 2, 1, 4)2@3,: (1, 6)1@4: (4)
dRolls: 4@2, 2@3, 4@4; Total Hits: 34@2,: (6, 6, 4, 6)2@3,: (1, 2)4@4: (5, 3, 6, 5)

[Guest]

you lose 3 destroyers, 1 cruiser
I damage battleship, lose 1 sub, 1 destroyer

z19 2
aRolls: 3@2, 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 23@2,: (6, 3, 6)2@3,: (5, 2)1@4: (3)
dRolls: 1@2, 1@3, 4@4; Total Hits: 41@2,: (5)1@3,: (1)4@4: (3, 2, 3, 6)

[Guest]

you lose 1 cruiser, 1 battleship
I lose 3 destroyers, 1 cruiser

z19 3
aRolls: 1@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3,: (6)1@4: (4)
dRolls: 1@2, 3@4; Total Hits: 01@2,: (5)3@4: (6, 5, 6)

[Guest]

you lose second fighter (both battleships remain)

z19 4
aRolls: 1@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 01@3,: (5)1@4: (5)
dRolls: 1@2, 2@4; Total Hits: 11@2,: (3)2@4: (1, 5)

[Guest]

I will lose the battleship and stop there

NONCOMBAT MOVES
z21
2 carriers from z45 (one carries ANZAC fighter)
1 fig from battle in z19
1 fig, 1 tac from Northern territory

Guam
1 inf, 1 art from Dutch New Guinea via tt z45 to z21

UK
1 inf, 1 art, 1 armor from Quebec via 2tt z106 to z109
2 fig from battle in z109

MOBILIZE UNITS
1 carrier, 1 destroyer in z109
3 armor in India

COLLECT INCOME
Convoy raid Scotland (1 sub) plus assume 1 for transjordan cuz I don;t want to type all that
Rolling 2d6:
(2, 3)

[Guest]

UK Europe = 30(territories) +0(NOs) -3(convoy damage) +5 saved = 32IPCs

UK Pacific = 7(territories) +0(NOs) -0(convoy damage) +3 saved = 10IPCs

wheatbeer vs vance 02 4fUK.AAM

[wheatbeer]

Hey, this whole battle needs to be redone.  I don’t mean to be picky … but I told you earlier that I intended to use my kamikazes.

[wheatbeer]

If you’re attacking with 1 sub, 4 dest, 1 cru, 1 fig, 1 bsh, then I would roll 1 kamikaze at each surface ship.

[Guest]

aww dammit; I’m sorry.  For some reason I had it in my mind that you meant z6 for the kamikaze’s, which doesn’t even make sense because the UK ships couldn’t reach z6! I’m not trying to screw up your game, it’s me being scatterbrained.

OK here is that battle redone:

z19 Kamikazes
destroyers
aRolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 04@2: (4, 5, 6, 6)
cruiser
aRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)
battleship
aRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)

[Guest]

OK that was crummy so I am going to reroll those kamikazes

z19 Kamikazes
destroyers
aRolls: 4@2; Total Hits: 34@2: (1, 3, 2, 2)
cruiser
aRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)
battleship
aRolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

[Guest]

z19 (3 destroyers, 1 carrier, 2 cruisers, 2 fig, 2 damaged battleships)
1 sub, 1 destroyer, 1 cruiser, 1 fig, 1 damaged battleship from z45

aRolls: 2@2, 2@3, 1@4; Total Hits: 32@2,: (3, 3)2@3,: (3, 1)1@4: (3)
dRolls: 4@2, 2@3, 3@4; Total Hits: 44@2,: (1, 6, 2, 1)2@3,: (4, 6)3@4: (5, 5, 3)

[Guest]

I missed a roll for 1 batleship

dRolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (3)

[Guest]

OK her is the map with that battle done correctly (I hope).  I really am sorry for screwing that up.  It was not intentional.

Also, in the USA attack on z19, the reason I thought you would land your fighters on land was that you might want to save the fighters to defend Japan.  As it turns out, your decision was better because now the UK fleet is down to 1 carrier.

wheatbeer vs vance 02 4fUK fixed.AAM

[wheatbeer]

5/6 hits is less likely than 0/6 … you sure you want to go with that?

If you do, I’ll lose 3 destroyers for round 1.

[Guest]

Yes, we’ll stick with that.  Fair is fair and I owe you one bit of leeway for giving me a lot of leeway with screwing up TWO battles!