Attack value of strategic bombers


  • Yes when in doubt look at what the peices are. I find them interesting the infantry escpecially. Americans use M1 Garands, British use Enfields, Russians use PPshs, Germans use Kar98ks and the Japanese use Ar… you know I’m not gonna try to pronounce that.


  • I agree with your thinking on the role of stratigic bombers. the tac bomber has somewhat replaced this piece on the battlefield. I am thinking more along the lines of SBs to make initail preemptive attack in opening of land combat, first round only causilties removed immeadiately. SBs can be left in enemy TT to reduce mobility on opponets turn, sort of like SBs are taking out roads and RR systems, reducing tanks and mechs to 1 move. maybe infantry cant move out of TT in this situation. also, i really like the idea of 3 or more SBs is considered carpet bombing and enemy units defence is reduced by 1. But i do think SBs attack value should be kept at 4.


  • Haha now that I think about it I never use bombers except the ones I start out with. After that IF I buy air units I get fighters.

  • Sponsor '17 TripleA '11 '10

    I agree with specializing the Strat Bombers a bit more. But like most of you, I agree that SBR attacks usually result in expensive bomber losses for little result. How about this:

    Attack: 1 or 2 (not sure which)
    Defend: 1
    SBR: 2 dice damage
    2 hits (1 hit causing return to base as suggested above)
    Cost: 15 - 16

    Thoughts on this? I would like to encourage more purchases and SBRs as it was a major factor in WW2…


  • Maybe they could get a single premtive attack in land combat like a sub (AA gun preventable of course). This simulates bombing before an operation. However I think that adding completely new rules for air units would be interesting.

Suggested Topics

  • 5
  • 1
  • 5
  • 13
  • 18
  • 4
  • 9
  • 10
Axis & Allies Boardgaming Custom Painted Miniatures

36

Online

17.0k

Users

39.3k

Topics

1.7m

Posts