L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

italy may go

On it.

[trulpen]

Lol, that convoy disruption roll. :face_with_rolling_eyes:

But I definitely prefer that from failing in z91.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

I have an impression that axis are overpowered in BM. I dont like them, Allies are my favorites, but i think that the bid for allies will grow similar like in OOB, to first 20 ipc, and then to 40-50 ipc.

the axis are too strong

No, don’t think that will ever happen. Maybe 20, but absolutely not the level 40-50. Allies are a lot stronger in BM3 compared to OOB.

Check out @axis-dominion and how he plays me as Allies. I’ve gotten a thorough beating in our two first games. Didn’t stand a chance. And that was with a +3 bid in the first game and +6 in the second. For Axis (sic).

I’ll likely be destroyed in our third game where he generously let me have a bid of 9 for Axis (placed as sub z108 and inf Kwangsi).

He is a master.

I am not saying he is not a better player then U are, but if U parked an autobus in front of Gibraltar with Germany he wouldnt smash u so easily as u say, its a question would he anyway?

In my exp in last few games (with both axis and allies) germany has enough money to come to the door of moscow and fortify or deadzone sz 91

that is brutal

japan is a monster with 21 air unit on rd 1.

even with weak italy, japan and germany are monsters if played well

i wont play allies without a 40 bid

i prefer them more, but i dont want to loose games all the time

i ll play them only with a turbo bid, or against weaker opponents for my joy of playin allies

and in this game , thats it, too small bid for me + bad dices and i am probably toast soon

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

Lol, that convoy disruption roll. :face_with_rolling_eyes:

But I definitely prefer that from failing in z91.

that is nothin comparing to what i ve lost in sz 91

[Amon-Sul]

i am behind in this game so i ve decided to take a risk in sz 91

with bad dices and -200 it seems like a bad decision

but we ll see if i can dig up something

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

Lol, that convoy disruption roll. :face_with_rolling_eyes:

But I definitely prefer that from failing in z91.

that is nothin comparing to what i ve lost in sz 91

Definitely.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

i wont play allies without a 40 bid

i prefer them more, but i dont want to loose games all the time

In our first game you won as Allies with a bid of 7.

[trulpenplay]

TripleA Turn Summary: Italians round 6

TripleA Turn Summary for game: World War II Global 1940 Balanced Mod3, version: 3.4

Game History

Round: 6

    Purchase Units - Italians
        Italians buy 1 destroyer, 1 infantry and 2 mech_infantrys; Remaining resources: 0 PUs; 

    Combat Move - Italians
        1 mech_infantry moved from Ukraine to Caucasus
              Italians take Caucasus from Russians
        1 bomber moved from Ukraine to Russia
        1 armour moved from Libya to Tobruk
              Italians take Tobruk from British
        1 armour moved from Tobruk to Libya
        1 bomber moved from Southern Italy to Russia

    Combat - Italians
        Strategic bombing raid in Russia
                AA fire in Russia : 0/2 hits, 0,33 expected hits
            Bombing raid in Russia rolls: 6,4 and causes: 10 damage to unit: factory_major
            Bombing raid in Russia causes 10 damage total. 

    Non Combat Move - Italians
        2 armour moved from Tambov to Bryansk
        2 bombers moved from Russia to Bryansk
        2 fighters moved from Gibraltar to Southern Italy
        1 artillery and 1 infantry moved from Tunisia to Libya
        1 aaGun moved from Southern Italy to Northern Italy
        4 infantry moved from Southern Italy to Northern Italy

    Place Units - Italians
        1 destroyer placed in 97 Sea Zone
        2 mech_infantrys placed in Northern Italy
        1 infantry placed in Northern Italy

    Turn Complete - Italians
        Total Cost from Convoy Blockades: 4
            Rolling for Convoy Blockade Damage in 97 Sea Zone. Rolls: 5,2,1,6,1,6
        Italians collect 15 PUs (4 lost to blockades); end with 15 PUs
        Objective Italians 2 Roman Empire: Italians met a national objective for an additional 5 PUs; end with 20 PUs

Combat Hit Differential Summary :

AA fire in Russia : : -0,33

Savegame

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

i wont play allies without a 40 bid

i prefer them more, but i dont want to loose games all the time

In our first game you won as Allies with a bid of 7.

that was our first game xd

and ur pardon my term catastrophic italy, non naval agressive germany etc

[Amon-Sul]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

agressive germany etc

have to go to lunch i ll come back for 30 40 min

[trulpen]

I’m still not tier E btw. Will also lose two more games soon.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

I’m still not tier E btw. Will also lose two more games soon.

how so ? against M guys?

[trulpen]

Thing is, oysteilo went from M to 1. The ranking is adjusted accordingly. Same when you went from M to E. So the points you get from each opponent is not fixed, but is a flowing entity depending on their present tier.

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

Thing is, oysteilo went from M to 1. The ranking is adjusted accordingly. Same when you went from M to E. So the points you get from each opponent is not fixed, but is a flowing entity depending on their present tier.

yep. i won two games against oysteilo, thats the reason he went from M to 1 xd

[Amon-Sul]

its anzac turn, so could usa took celebes or not?

i need to know since it affects anzac

cheers

[trulpen]

I looked into the situation in Celebes. Unfortunately I can’t allow that change, since it’s very much impacted by the result in z36. Lets say you had the same luck as in z91. Then Japan would be in position to wipe out both z44 and z42. After rolling 6/7 in z36, it’s safe to say that such a possibility was out of question. So the change can’t be made after rolling of the attacking dice.

I really tried to reason with myself to make that change happen, because I like to be lenient, but this is my honest and, I believe, fair interpretation.

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

its anzac turn, so could usa took celebes or not?

i need to know since it affects anzac

cheers

You are mean! :grin:

[Amon-Sul]

@trulpen said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

I looked into the situation in Celebes. Unfortunately I can’t allow that change, since it’s very much impacted by the result in z36. Lets say you had the same luck as in z91. Then Japan would be in position to wipe out both z44 and z42. After rolling 6/7 in z36, it’s safe to say that such a possibility was out of question. So the change can’t be made after rolling of the attacking dice.

I really tried to reason with myself to make that change happen, because I like to be lenient, but this is my honest and, I believe, fair interpretation.

id didnt have anything with sz 36 but with sz 37 and my defiance to re open in cm again

but i respect ur deciison

cheers

[Amon-Sul]

i have some usa ncm

[trulpen]

@Amon-Sul said in L20 #4 trulpen (X) vs Amon-Sul (A+10) BM3:

yep. i won two games against oysteilo, thats the reason he went from M to 1 xd

You are mean! :grin:

(Disregard the previous post like this. It was meant for this one.)