Strategy: Bombs Over Berlin

I don’t want a refund.  I just want to be consulted on the AA:50-enhanced version of the game where we fix all the bloody errors in this one!

@Cmdr:

I don’t want a refund.  I just want to be consulted on the AA:50-enhanced version of the game where we fix all the bloody errors in this one!

Step one is not yet complete.

what is step one?

Identifying ALL the bloody errors, so that as each problem is fixed, it will not be in a vacuum.
Fixing 1 or two issues is easy.

Fixing 5 or more can be a difficult task as the interactions of the fixes must be taken into proper considersation.

@Flashman:

@Cmdr:

There are two things I learned in Revised that I suspect are true in Anniversary as well.

1)  She who controls the oceans, wins the game.  Period.  End of story.  I don’t care if you have a billion infantry and I have 1 infantry, if I own the oceans, I win.  Therefore, navy IS important. (my favorite trick in enhanced is to drop 2 or 3 submarines in the water every round with one of my nations until I dominate the oceans.)

Why is this true?  Without a navy you cannot use any of your infantry offensively and, as we all know, turtle-ing as your only strategy is doomed to failure.  Eventually the one controlling the oceans will control the mainland and out produce you.

2)  She who has the biggest air force, tends to win the game.  No idea why this is true.  I suspect it is related to your ability to mass more firepower on your attacks without risking them to counter attack.  It also is not ALWAYS true.  Sure, if England does nothing but buy fighters for the entire game, they might have the biggest air force, but they also have no ability to land troops.

Now, if you assume both 1 and 2 above are true.  Then it makes sense to use air power to establish command of the oceans early, followed by a slow build of of warships to maintain that power, then to use your air power on frivolous things like SBR damage.

You didn’t study under Don Rae, by any chance?

I seriously doubt it, since Don Rae was a 100% supporter of infantry, infantry yet even more infantry. And rightfully so if I made add.

If I read Jennifer correct she is advocating for Russia and Germany to buy ships/subs and air power……  :roll:

mmm, i definitely disagree with owning the sea wins the game. just simply because that strategy isn’t effective for every country. what works for one nation, may/will not work for another

you could, of course, look at it from the perspective of each side. whichever side controls the oceans, wins the game haha  :-D

Controlling the seas could include denying its use to your foes. not just building ships.

ie German bombers and fighters…maybe a few subs in the North Atlantic.

@Driel310:

@Flashman:

@Cmdr:

There are two things I learned in Revised that I suspect are true in Anniversary as well.

1)  She who controls the oceans, wins the game.  Period.  End of story.  I don’t care if you have a billion infantry and I have 1 infantry, if I own the oceans, I win.  Therefore, navy IS important. (my favorite trick in enhanced is to drop 2 or 3 submarines in the water every round with one of my nations until I dominate the oceans.)

Why is this true?  Without a navy you cannot use any of your infantry offensively and, as we all know, turtle-ing as your only strategy is doomed to failure.  Eventually the one controlling the oceans will control the mainland and out produce you.

2)  She who has the biggest air force, tends to win the game.  No idea why this is true.  I suspect it is related to your ability to mass more firepower on your attacks without risking them to counter attack.  It also is not ALWAYS true.  Sure, if England does nothing but buy fighters for the entire game, they might have the biggest air force, but they also have no ability to land troops.

Now, if you assume both 1 and 2 above are true.  Then it makes sense to use air power to establish command of the oceans early, followed by a slow build of of warships to maintain that power, then to use your air power on frivolous things like SBR damage.

You didn’t study under Don Rae, by any chance?

I seriously doubt it, since Don Rae was a 100% supporter of infantry, infantry yet even more infantry. And rightfully so if I made add.

If I read Jennifer correct she is advocating for Russia and Germany to buy ships/subs and air power……  :roll:

Actually, no.  I am advocating Japan, America and England buy ships.  (Japan if the allies are not building enough ships.  America and England because no navy means it’s Russia alone against everyone.)

Russia needs Infantry and tanks and allies aggressive enough to get ships to them with supplies.

@tin_snips:

mmm, i definitely disagree with owning the sea wins the game. just simply because that strategy isn’t effective for every country. what works for one nation, may/will not work for another

you could, of course, look at it from the perspective of each side. whichever side controls the oceans, wins the game haha  :-D

Okay, I’ll take that challenge.

I get America, Russia and England.  You get Germany and Japan.

You are forbidden to build ANY ships and all your starting ships will be removed from the board.

Who will win?

If you didn’t understand, I am saying that control of the oceans determines who will eventually win the game.  If Japan has no fleet because the allies control the oceans, then they can NEVER invade England or America.  Likewise, if America and England have no fleet because Germany/Japan own the oceans, they can NEVER land troops to defend Russia or attack Germany/Japan.

@axis_roll:

@Cmdr:

I don’t want a refund.  I just want to be consulted on the AA:50-enhanced version of the game where we fix all the bloody errors in this one!

Step one is not yet complete.

what is step one?

Identifying ALL the bloody errors, so that as each problem is fixed, it will not be in a vacuum.
Fixing 1 or two issues is easy.

Fixing 5 or more can be a difficult task as the interactions of the fixes must be taken into proper considersation.

Identifying all the bloody errors:

1)  WOTC/Avalon Hill produced the game.
2)  Larry did not have the “testicular fortitude” to impose logical rules such as those in AARe into his anniversary edition, instead letting his name be used on an inferior product.
3)  We, the gaming community, were not forceful enough in vociferating our views to the “man” and the “corporation.”

I think that about sums up all the bloody errors.

Now, the unbloody errors we need to determine.  Like how can you use the rules to stop one side from exploiting bombers?  Is it really so bad to find random techs like in classic, or should we go back to targeted development, etc. :P

Okay, that’s a bit of humor.

your challenge would be acceptable if i had of stated that japan doesn’t need a fleet. i just said that some nations do, some nations don’t

if you want me to get specific, germany and russia can get by fine without a fleet  :-P

@tin_snips:

your challenge would be acceptable if i had of stated that japan doesn’t need a fleet. i just said that some nations do, some nations don’t

if you want me to get specific, germany and russia can get by fine without a fleet  :-P

Exactly my point.  But Germany and Russia alone cannot win the game.  Impossible.

In Classic you only win when you get 2 Capitols.  You cannot take any two capitols on the board without a fleet. (M84 being a pussy way to win and thus thrown out right off the bat.  Many players ignored that rule as well.)

In Revised you cannot win without 10 (or 9 in tournaments online) victory cities.  For the axis 9 are BARELY possible if they take EVERY mainland VC and not lose any of their own. (Without a navy, I wager that is impossible since Philippines will fall to America or England and thus you won’t get more than 8.)  The allies could technically get 10, but again, England and America with no fleet means no units and thus, Russia would have to get insanely good dice to single handedly take out all of Europe AND secure all of Asia.

Basically, no fleet means no way to win the game.  Period.  I understand you need infantry to KEEP what you have, but you cannot WIN without a fleet.  I’m talking alliances, not nations.  Germany itself can probably get away with 20-30 rounds without a fleet as could Russia.  But eventually, if you have NO FLEET and the other side has complete dominance of the oceans, you WILL lose the game.  It’s inevitable.

@tin_snips:

you could, of course, look at it from the perspective of each side. whichever side controls the oceans, wins the game haha  :-D

glad we agree on that note  :lol: