G40-01 Ksmckay (Axis -9) vs Wheatbeer (Allies)

[ksmckay]

Bid is -9 - Remove 1 inf from Japan and 1 AA from Carolines

Have fun!

[wheatbeer]

Likewise  :-)

Let me know if there’s any kind of Abattlemap incompatibility

ksmckay vs wheatbeer start map - w bid.AAM

[ksmckay]

Does this file work for you?

G01_ksmckay_wheatbeer_start.AAM

[wheatbeer]

It does.  You still need to delete one infantry off the Caroline Islands though.

[ksmckay]

The bid was One inf Japan, one AA carolines.  So I dont remove any inf from Carolines.

Germany 1

Purchases 30
1 CV 2 trn

Combat movement

z106
1 ss z117

Z110
1 ss z108
1 ss z103
1 ftr Hol
2 ftr 3 tac WGr

z111
1 ss z118
1 ss z124
1 ftr Nor
1 tac 1 bom Ger

z112
1 bb 1 ca z113
1 tac Pol
1 ftr Hun

Fra
3 inf 1 art 4 mec WGr
4 inf 2 art 3 arm Hol
2 arm 2Gr

Yugo
1 inf 1 arm Rom
2 inf 1 arm Hun
4 inf SGr
1 arm Pol

Scramble in z110 or z111?

G01_ksmckay_wheatbeer_01Ag_cm.AAM

[wheatbeer]

No scramble either SZ

[ksmckay]

z106
1 ss
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (4)

1 dd
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)

[ksmckay]

z106 rnd 2
1 ss
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (2)

1 dd
Rolls: 1@2; Total Hits: 11@2: (1)

[ksmckay]

z106 holds with trn

z110
2 ss 3 ftr 3 tac
Rolls: 2@2 3@3 3@4; Total Hits: 42@2: (1, 2)3@3: (6, 6, 3)3@4: (4, 5, 6)

1 CA 1 BB
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (5)1@4: (1)

[ksmckay]

z110 twlo ss

z111
2 ss 1 ftr 1 tac 1 bom
Rolls: 2@2 1@3 2@4; Total Hits: 22@2: (3, 2)1@3: (4)2@4: (4, 6)

1 dd 1 BB
Rolls: 1@2 1@4; Total Hits: 01@2: (5)1@4: (5)

[ksmckay]

z111 rnd 2
2 ss
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 12@2: (2, 3)

[ksmckay]

z111 cwol

z112
1 CA 1 ftr 1 tac 1 BB
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 12@3: (4, 6)2@4: (6, 2)

2 CA
Rolls: 2@3; Total Hits: 02@3: (5, 5)

[ksmckay]

z112 rnd 2
1 ca 1 ftr 1 tac 1 bb
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 22@3: (3, 6)2@4: (3, 5)

1 CA
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (2)

[ksmckay]

z112 twol, bb damaged

Fra
7 inf 3 art 4 mec 5 arm
Rolls: 8@1 6@2 5@3; Total Hits: 48@1: (5, 5, 3, 3, 2, 2, 6, 1)6@2: (4, 4, 1, 2, 3, 6)5@3: (1, 5, 5, 5, 4)

7 inf 2 art 2 arm 1 ftr
Rolls: 9@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 29@2: (5, 4, 5, 6, 3, 5, 1, 3, 5)2@3: (5, 6)1@4: (2)

[ksmckay]

Fra rnd 2
5 inf 3 art 4 mec 5 arm
Rolls: 6@1 6@2 5@3; Total Hits: 96@1: (6, 6, 5, 4, 1, 1)6@2: (4, 6, 2, 6, 2, 2)5@3: (1, 5, 3, 1, 2)

3 inf 2 art 2 arm 1 ftr
Rolls: 5@2 2@3 1@4; Total Hits: 35@2: (6, 3, 1, 6, 3)2@3: (5, 1)1@4: (2)

[ksmckay]

Fra twlo 5 inf, 19 ipcs captured

Yugo
7 inf 3 arm
Rolls: 7@1 3@3; Total Hits: 07@1: (5, 6, 3, 2, 3, 2, 6)3@3: (4, 6, 4)

5 inf
Rolls: 5@2; Total Hits: 15@2: (6, 3, 1, 6, 3)

[ksmckay]

Yugo rnd 2
6 inf 3 arm
Rolls: 6@1 3@3; Total Hits: 26@1: (5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 5)3@3: (4, 3, 4)

5 inf
Rolls: 5@2; Total Hits: 25@2: (2, 3, 3, 6, 2)

[ksmckay]

Yugo rnd 3
Input ErrorThere was an error in your dice throw: “4” is not correct syntax.aaa 4@1 3@3:

3 inf
Rolls: 3@2; Total Hits: 03@2: (5, 6, 3)

[ksmckay]

reroll attack
4 inf 3 arm
Rolls: 4@1 3@3; Total Hits: 34@1: (1, 2, 6, 1)3@3: (1, 6, 4)

[ksmckay]

Yugo twlo 3 inf

Combat results
z106 holds with trn, attacker loses ss
z110 twlo ss
z111 twol
z112 twol, bb damaged
Fra twlo 5 inf
Yugo twlo 3 inf

Miserable defense by the allies.  You didnt really have a shot of winning any of them but the damage should have been much worse.