Here is a Facebook group for Australian fans who would like to discuss holding an Australian Axis and Allies championship.
XDAP2 - Round 1 - MethodOne Clinic vs Chaos U. Alumni Association
-
the game is a go odonis. they have given you the privilege of making the first bid for the allies.
-
check that, odonis and methuselah are on the same team. waiting to hear from chaos - please pm them both.
-
I have pm’d them and pr0c3ss replied. Waiting on a bid from their team. Excited to get this ball rolling!
-
Alright, let’s get this going. We’ll take the Allies with +90 IPCs bonus units. 8-)
-
Bold move there. We bid Allies +20.
And to clarify, bid restrictions are: “one unit per territory/sz with existing units of placed power; only inf/art/fig for China.” No tech, friendly game (reasonable edits allowed).
-
Allies +19. :-D
-
allies +12
-
Allies +19. :-D
Allies +18
But if you want Bold’s 12 bid, we’ll let you have it :lol:
-
Allies +8
-
:wink: don’t mind me.
good luck everyone!
-
Haha, no worries. We’ll see if we can work these guys down that low 8-)
Send my regards to the indomitable inhabitants of London in y’all’s game! (I’ve never seen 16 damage G1 before…)
-
Haha, no worries. We’ll see if we can work these guys down that low 8-)
Send my regards to the indomitable inhabitants of London in y’all’s game! (I’ve never seen 16 damage G1 before…)
That was a pretty sweet G1 for sure. It’s gonna be interesting.
-
Allies +15. What say you?
-
Team MethOdone Clinic gives you the allies at +15 ipcs!
Please let us know your bid placements, and we will post G1. Primary ownership will be myself as Japan and The Right Honorable Odonis presiding as Germany and Italy. Here’s to a fun game for all, and good dice for the Axis :-D
-
Cool, will confer with my ally about placement, back soon.
-
All extra units to the UK:
+1 inf Paris
+1 inf London
+1 inf British Guiana
+1 inf Borneo
+1 inf French IndochinaI’ll be playing UK, USA, China, and pr0c3ss will be playing USSR, France, Anzac to keep downtime to a minimum.
Let’s rock this!
-
And to clarify, bid restrictions are: “one unit per territory/sz with existing units of placed power; only inf/art/fig for China.” No tech, friendly game (reasonable edits allowed).
I hate to be a bother, but these bid restrictions don’t allow for infantry in Guinea, Borneo, or FIC, sorry :/ (our bidding counted on that being the case)
-
the league allows a placement of a land unit even if there is not a land unit present. to place a sea unit, a sea unit must already be present in the zone.
one COULD read this bid restriction as written to be 1 unit per tt and 1 unit per seazone with already existing units. perhaps it was made more clear in a PM?
see what i mean?
-
the league allows a placement of a land unit even if there is not a land unit present. to place a sea unit, a sea unit must already be present in the zone.
one COULD read this bid restriction as written to be 1 unit per tt and 1 unit per seazone with already existing units. perhaps it was made more clear in a PM?
see what i mean?
You’re right, the league does allow land units in unoccupied territories, and I suppose I was not as clear as I could have been.
We decided to preclude this kind of placement from the get-go (whether we got allies or not) and asked CUAA if they were OK with the bid restrictions. We perhaps wrongly took their silence on the matter as implicit approval.
I’m not trying to cause a ruckus here, just pointing to what we had thought were established bid restrictions. If guinea inf was on the table, we may have bid 14 is all.
pr0c3ss and Make_It_Round, what are y’all’s thoughts? You can place the 15 differently or we can re-bid with different placement restrictions, whatever y’all prefer. Not trying to pressure you into anything, and I hope you don’t hate us for being so nit-picky :-(
-
the league allows a placement of a land unit even if there is not a land unit present. to place a sea unit, a sea unit must already be present in the zone.
one COULD read this bid restriction as written to be 1 unit per tt and 1 unit per seazone with already existing units. perhaps it was made more clear in a PM?
see what i mean?
You’re right, the league does allow land units in unoccupied territories, and I suppose I was not as clear as I could have been.
We decided to preclude this kind of placement from the get-go (whether we got allies or not) and asked CUAA if they were OK with the bid restrictions. We perhaps wrongly took their silence on the matter as implicit approval.
I’m not trying to cause a ruckus here, just pointing to what we had thought were established bid restrictions. If guinea inf was on the table, we may have bid 14 is all.
pr0c3ss and Make_It_Round, what are y’all’s thoughts? You can place the 15 differently or we can re-bid with different placement restrictions, whatever y’all prefer. Not trying to pressure you into anything, and I hope you don’t hate us for being so nit-picky :-(
i know y’all will work it out - just an honest miscommunication.
Suggested Topics
