G40a3.9 MrGreen(axis) vs SethTheNewt(allies)

[seth4god]

Tob final

first hit counts
A
Rolls: 20@3; Total Hits: 620@3: (4, 4, 4, 2, 5, 2, 4, 4, 1, 5, 4, 4, 6, 1, 6, 4, 2, 4, 1, 5)

D
Rolls: 20@3; Total Hits: 1120@3: (1, 2, 6, 5, 3, 4, 1, 3, 4, 1, 5, 2, 5, 3, 3, 3, 4, 6, 1, 5)

[seth4god]

Tob held w/arm  :-(

sz97 (ac, dst, 2ftr, 1tac, 1bmb vs ca, bb)

A
Rolls: 1@2 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 21@2: (2)2@3: (5, 6)2@4: (1, 5)

D
Rolls: 1@3 1@4; Total Hits: 11@3: (6)1@4: (1)

[seth4god]

sz97 rd2

A
Rolls: 2@3 2@4; Total Hits: 12@3: (6, 5)2@4: (3, 5)

D
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (3)

[seth4god]

sz97 1 missed ca roll on first round
Rolls: 1@3; Total Hits: 11@3: (3)

[seth4god]

sz97 twlo dst, missed ca in first round killed off bb

ncm
ftr, bmb sz97 > mal
trn inf, arm que > UK v/t
trn sz109 > sz106
inf, art ont > que
2inf, aa scot > UK
inf sud > egy
2inf saf > rho
dst sz71 > sz80
inf malay > sum v/t
bb sz37 > sz41
dd, ca sz39 > sz41
inf malay > shn
6inf, art, 2aa ind > bur
ftr bur > ind

place
6inf, ftr UK
2inf, art, ftr Ind

Collect
EUK 33
PUK 18

mrgVseth01aUK.AAM

[Mistergreen]

I am sad to inform you that US cannot activate neutrals while neutral. You just wanna return to sz101 or do something else with the trn? I’ll proceed with Italy…

[Mistergreen]

The good news is that I got UKw at 32+5=37 ipc instead of 33…  :-)

[Mistergreen]

…but pUK only at 17 ipc.

[Mistergreen]

A combined mistake, you had marked the pUK conquest with a eUK marker. Now I got them at 28+5=33 and 21. Still 4 more to pUK. :-)

[seth4god]

@Mistergreen:

I am sad to inform you that US cannot activate neutrals while neutral. You just wanna return to sz101 or do something else with the trn? I’ll proceed with Italy…

Ok, yeah just reread the rules on that. My bad.

Also, I didn’t actually place the US purchase

Place
2 ac, tac sz10
1 dd sz101

[Mistergreen]

I think I got it all, but never hurts to double check, proceeding with Italy…

[Mistergreen]

Italy 1:

bank=10
trn@7
inf@3

cm:
4 inf sita > sfr /v trn sz96 > sz93 + trn sz95 > sz93
2 art nita > sfr
2 inf, arm nita > fra
ss, dd, ca sz95 > sz93
2 fig sita > sz93
bmb nita > sz93

sz93 rd1:
A(ss, dd, ca, 2 fig, bmb)
Rolls: 2@2 3@3 1@4; Total Hits: 22@2: (6, 3)3@3: (6, 4, 2)1@4: (3)
D(dd, ca)
Rolls: 1@2 1@3; Total Hits: 01@2: (3)1@3: (6)

[Mistergreen]

sz93 cwol.

sfr rd1:
A(4 inf, 2 art)
Rolls: 2@1 4@2; Total Hits: 22@1: (5, 6)4@2: (4, 1, 5, 2)
D(inf, art)
Rolls: 2@2; Total Hits: 02@2: (3, 4)

[Mistergreen]

sfr twol.

Forgot a cm if you don’t mind:
arm tob > alx(mt) > tob

fra rd1:
A(2 inf, arm)
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (4, 6)1@3: (6)
D(fig)
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 01@4: (6)

[Mistergreen]

fra rd2:
A(2 inf, arm)
Rolls: 2@1 1@3; Total Hits: 02@1: (3, 2)1@3: (6)
D(fig)
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (2)

[Mistergreen]

fra rd2:
A(inf, arm)
Rolls: 1@1 1@3; Total Hits: 01@1: (5)1@3: (5)
D(fig)
Rolls: 1@4; Total Hits: 11@4: (1)

[seth4god]

@Mistergreen:

sfr twol.

Forgot a cm if you don’t mind:
arm tob > alx(mt) > tob

Not a problem. I’ll probably look at your italy and then head to bed . . . most of my mistakes I can chalk up to inexperience w/G40, but I need some sleep so I can think clearly. I should have my next turn sometime late morning.

[Mistergreen]

Would suck to lose this battle, note to self when you must win the battle 99% is way better than 92%.

fra rd3+ (first hit wins)
A(arm)
Rolls: 33@3; Total Hits: 1633@3: (3, 5, 6, 5, 1, 6, 3, 3, 2, 5, 5, 2, 3, 5, 6, 5, 2, 5, 1, 3, 3, 5, 5, 1, 4, 2, 1, 4, 6, 4, 6, 3, 2)
D(fig)
Rolls: 33@4; Total Hits: 2333@4: (5, 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 5, 2, 3, 6, 4, 2, 6, 3, 4, 4, 3, 1, 1, 1, 5, 1, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 6, 2, 3, 1, 6, 3)

[Mistergreen]

Phew  :-)

fra twlo 2 inf.

ncm:
2 fig, bmb sz93 > sita

placement:
inf > sita
trn > sz95

Cd in sz97:
Rolls: 5@3; Total Hits: 35@3: (5, 1, 5, 1, 3)

[Mistergreen]

collect:
19+19-5=33 ipc

mrgVseth01eIta.AAM