@Cmdr:
Well, I was promised a slot in the next FFA since i missed the last one, hopin that promise will be honored. :)
@mojo:
i forgot you tekkyy, yes we can dicuss rules first, your in if you want,
Now we see why Jen sounded worried.
You added up 3 (excluded her). And then you remember me (who haven’t said in yet) and forgot her. :-D
Anyway I am pretty sure you have a slot Jen. You are the 4th to say I.
but i was a little confused as to what you were saying.
in short, I am hoping we can give the new NAs and setup ago first
try the IPC rule and IPC setup change when its found to be needed
.
as for what NA’s we use, i think i have and old rule book , so we’ll have to look at it.
yeah have to print out LHTR 2.0
http://www.axisandallies.org/LHTR
as for the extra ipc’s, i think it’s important because both russia & uk start with very little units, and they are in the middle of fire. russia has germany & japan hitting them, and uk has germany & usa. germnay is in the middle also but they start with more units and 40 bucks.
its FFA so the discussion really just goes around
UK’s position is not that bad
in playtesting we saw that if US goes Altantic Japan will be left unchecked
with the united UK navy, increased UK and Russia income…its going to be more of Germany being in the middle of UK and Russia
so I think if we let UK and Russia choose NA, the IPC spread is actually much better than OOB
Jen (day 2) didn’t do too bad with UK
at UK5 there was 5 inf 2 art 3 arm 4 ftr 1 bmr in Egypt and 2 ftr 1 cv 1 dd 3 ss 4 tp in z34
she built South Africa IC, then later built Egypt IC
if the South Africa IC was free and 2 free inf per turn…
as for changing the name of jet fighters ?
so that the name is not the same as the tech
I wonder if +1 range to 5 does anything, how about 6?