In Canada we’ve always gone back to school after the Labour Day weekend. That’s about 9 weeks off for summer.
Should Schools Require School Uniforms?
-
Kinda like Nascar? Great idea, why not go one step further?
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/02/10/offbeat.forehead.ads/
-
That’s actually a very good idea! We could subsidize the education of our children through corporate advertising. Obviously we’d have to have some controlls on who or what is being advertised. But the uniforms could be purchased by companies and other companies could purchase patches for the uniforms, kinda like nascar. Anyway, the proceeds could be used to purchase books or lab equipment.
Well, it’s a novel idea, but I don’t know how good it is, ultimately. It’s pretty bad if schools need to resort to this just to do what they are supposed to do. I know that vending machines in the school are highly prized by students, but junk food is bad encouragement, IMO. Also, how much influence would these companies have over the admin, teachers, students, even curriculum? I also find that sanctuary from the constant bombardment of advertising is a good thing. Advertising is a distraction and not very conducive to learning. :|
-
Uniforms and / or dress codes…
My kids had uniforms in their public schools K-6. The area was rough and had a significant immigrant population along with gang recruitment. The uniform allowed for two different colors, neither of which matched the local gangs, and a variety of shirts, sweatshirts, tops, pants, shorts, skirts and jumpers for the boys and girls. Cost was maybe 10% less than if we were just buying our normal stuff for the kids but the “gucci gear” costs never would be in our budget anyway. The families who were struggling to put clothes on their kids were being helped by the PTO which maintained a “used clothes” bin. As clothing was outgrown, the ladies of the PTO would do some sewing and washing and then offer it for resale at a reduced cost. This provided funds for the PTO and for the families who could not even afford the reduced cost, things became free. I would point out this was a rather impoverished area. So much so that the Feds provided 100% free breakfast and lunch since more than 75% of the families qualified for food assistance.
By the time my daughter was entering middle school, we have moved into a more affluent area. Uniforms were not seen as a way to keep gangs out of the school since that was not a problem. The dress code was aimed at the “sexy” look and the “faddish” look. No belly buttons visible. No under clothing visible. Skirts and shorts have to reach below the hand of the wearer when standing.
Now with my daughter in high school, the dress code is less restrictive. Brand name clothing is important to her and as the boys and girls become men and women, clothing becomes another way to attract the opposite sex. Both boys and girls are pushing their own comfort zones as they try on different looks and identities.
I offer all of this both to help those who have not yet dealt with kids see what the various issues are as the kids get older and to provide background to my viewpoint.
A school uniform in K-5 makes perfect sense to me. Keep the kids more focused on being a cohesive group in a learning environment.
For grades 6-8 loosen the rules to a strict dress code. This gives the kids more freedom and with it more responsibiilty. Failure to meet the dress code in our middle school means the principal puts school sweatpants, t-shirt and sweatshirt on you, puts you back in class and calls you parents to bring appropriate clothing. Quite the scandal!!! <grin>For grades 9-12 lossen the dress code a little more. Certainly still keep the rules that allow gang colors and paraphenilia to be removed. Keep guidelines in place to encourage modesty and decency but again, increase freedom and increase responsibility. By this age, my kids are buying their own “brand name” clothing items to supplement the “Costco” clothing that we provide as parents.
Ideally, by the time the student has graduated from high school, getting dressed appropriately each day for the days activities should not be something that needs to be regulated.</grin>
-
That makes sense to me.
-
Careful, Baghdaddy, you coming dangerously close to a reasonable idea with some common ground. That sort of thing is not tolerated on either the internets or in public education. :wink:
-
That’s probably the most sensible, most thought-out position I’ve heard on the topic.
-
Sorry folks.
I’ll do my best to avoid rational thought in the future. :-D
I was doing so well until this thread came along. :roll:
-
Gang recruitment at an elementary school? That’s just sad…
-
Gang recruitment at an elementary school? That’s just sad…
Yes, it is. It also was happening.
We lived in a school district that was predominantly Mexican farm workers. The cost of living is such that it would take 2 or more working adults, per bedroom, to pay the rent of the houses. This meant a four bedroom house would have 8+ working adults with attendent children. The adults would not be able to stay home and watch over the kids, so parenting falls to the oldest kids. This lack of family structure encourages kids to find structure elsewhere and gangs provide that.
Add a language barrier, and legal status issues to the crushing poverty and it is a breeding ground for trouble.
Worth noting, is that the school uniform requirement was voted for by the parents of the children in school and is still “ratified” each school year by the new PTO. In the midst of all this mess, there are a lot of people trying very hard to move up into the American Dream. Quite a few made it through the door before the DotCom crash closed the door again.
This leads to a different set of observations…
We bought into that subdivision when the DotCom boom added a large number of new houses to the edge of what was otherwise a “barrio” school district. I had transferred my “military industrial complex” skills over to “DotCom” skills and moved to CA from VA. Our immediate neighborhood was all white collar, college educated (multi-cultural) familes but we made up < 10% of the school district population. There was a lot of effort made to improve the neighborhood and the school district but it all came crashing down with the DotCom bust.
The first sign was multiple families moving into a single family dwelling. The city refused to enforce zoning laws because they were “discriminatory”, according to the lady at City Hall. When that happened around the corner from us, we sold. It was obvious that the DotCom crash was going to change the neighborhood. The buyer of our house presented themselves as a young couple with young kids. After the sale finished, three more families with teenaged kids moved in with them. Our four bedroom house had four families with 13 children (8 + 13 = 21) for 21 people in a house zoned for “single family dwelling”. In less than six months, everyone we knew from that neighborhood had left. The number of kids in the school district quadrupled, with no change in tax base for the school.
The real irony, for me, is although we made good money on that house (+150K) allowing us to move where we are now, home prices in that neighborhood are now depressed and many of the mortgages there are “upside down” with the value of the loan exceeding the value of the home.
The mortgage bubble of high risk loans to under qualified people, has caused its own problem by deflating the house values that were sustaining the bubble. The under qualified borrower is forced to bring in boarders, which then lowers the value of the house, which then means the 3 to 5 year fixed / variable interest loan is a trap, not a stepping stone. So the borrower goes under and the loan originator takes a loss on a house that now does not have the resale value due to the depressed neighborhood. While I have sympathy for the under qualfied borrower, they signed on to a payment they could not make. The loan originator set the borrower and them selves up. Glad I jumped off that boat before it started sinking.
-
Gang recruitment at an elementary school? That’s just sad…
Yes, it is. It also was happening.
We lived in a school district that was predominantly Mexican farm workers. The cost of living is such that it would take 2 or more working adults, per bedroom, to pay the rent of the houses. This meant a four bedroom house would have 8+ working adults with attendent children. The adults would not be able to stay home and watch over the kids, so parenting falls to the oldest kids. This lack of family structure encourages kids to find structure elsewhere and gangs provide that.
Add a language barrier, and legal status issues to the crushing poverty and it is a breeding ground for troubl
you shouldn’t make excuses.
-
Gang recruitment at an elementary school? That’s just sad…
Yes, it is. It also was happening.
We lived in a school district that was predominantly Mexican farm workers. The cost of living is such that it would take 2 or more working adults, per bedroom, to pay the rent of the houses. This meant a four bedroom house would have 8+ working adults with attendent children. The adults would not be able to stay home and watch over the kids, so parenting falls to the oldest kids. This lack of family structure encourages kids to find structure elsewhere and gangs provide that.
Add a language barrier, and legal status issues to the crushing poverty and it is a breeding ground for troubl
you shouldn’t make excuses.
Not sure I understand what you mean.
-
Gang recruitment at an elementary school? That’s just sad…
Yes, it is. It also was happening.
We lived in a school district that was predominantly Mexican farm workers. The cost of living is such that it would take 2 or more working adults, per bedroom, to pay the rent of the houses. This meant a four bedroom house would have 8+ working adults with attendent children. The adults would not be able to stay home and watch over the kids, so parenting falls to the oldest kids. This lack of family structure encourages kids to find structure elsewhere and gangs provide that.
Add a language barrier, and legal status issues to the crushing poverty and it is a breeding ground for troubl
you shouldn’t make excuses.
Not sure I understand what you mean.
your creating excuses for their behavior for joining gangs by invoking a sympathy for them and moving the responsibilty from the children to thier parents.
-
Just reporting the conditions.
Obviously not all the kids were becoming gang members so it is not something they were being forced into but the lack of parental supervision was not helping.
You are free to offer your own ideas on why we were seeing gang recruitment in 2nd grade.
-
gang recruitment in 2nd grade.
I think I saw that on an episode of Walker Texas Ranger once
-
I saw it in my sons 2nd grade class.
Not cool.
-
Yeah that sounds like a realy bad situation
-
The irony for me was it was cheaper to move to a better school district than send my kids to private school.
Suggested Topics
