@midnight_reaper that’s a cool idea and I might have to try it. However I don’t like the idea of getting advancements for free, which is why I like some sort of facility to buy. Since the G40 R&D board seems to have the better advances on one side I’d say you have to roll a 1-4 to get the 1 column, and 5-6 to get the second. Maybe even through in an added cost to get 1-3 & 4-6. But again with that, I think countries should have to build the facilities in their capitol instead of anywhere and starting with them.
Rule Concerning Factory in China
-
We’re having a discussion about the rules for the Pacific game…
Can the US build units at the factory in China since they run this country. Or is the factory only there to:
1. Benefit Japan if they take China or
2. On the off chance that China takes valuable territory, they can build stuff.thanks,
B- -
The us cannot build units in China. Only Chinese troops are “built” but they do not cost IPC’s
-
A&A players …
Please, note this is aa AAP question.
-
My goof i thought it was an AARP question. Must be my alzheimers kicking in.
-
Ive always played where you can only build infantry there even if japan owns it 8)
-
A&A players …
Please, note this is aa AAP question.
Xi
Thanks, I was wondering what the fudge he was asking……
-
I don’t recall seeing anything in the rule book which specifically prohibited
building units there. My experience has always been that the U.S. is typically spending all its $$$ In U.S., Hawaii or in any new IC"s built. In our games the U.S. Player usually builds a couple of Armor units, artillery, US infantry maybe another fighter. -
Sorry for the confusion, Mr. President!
mortie_, are you serious or whut!?!
-
El: Of course I´m serious. The US can build an IC in China in AA (although they probably won´t have China by the time it´s their turn), so the question seemed weird. Kinda like: Can the UK put its troops on US transporters? The answer to both questions is: Sure, go for it.
But then again, Bradford DID say it was a Pacific question……