Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. ampdrive
    A
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 13
    • Posts 156
    • Best 26
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    ampdrive

    @ampdrive

    Been playing historical games since 1970.Despite glitches,1998 hasbro cd hooked me on A&A

    34
    Reputation
    129
    Profile views
    156
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    1
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Location vancouver canada Age 68

    ampdrive Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by ampdrive

    • RE: The Italian playbook

      @colonel-ace I love it when people call it a “TORONTO” raid.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Norwegian/Finnish Facilities

      @Marco-Luti Conveniently,Russia has factories that can be "ahem"liberated in ukraine,st petersburg and volgograd.Cannon fodder volunteers can be recruited there to shield your panzers for when you want to free moscow from the bolshevics.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: The Italian playbook

      When they come out with a War of 1812 game,then we can conduct a toronto raid.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Question Regarding Normandy/Bordeaux

      @barnee If a realistic opportunity to do Sealion is on the table,I want the factory,and to a lesser extent,the NB in normandy.I also like to eliminate the french inf/art so they can’t be taking holland.If allies land in normandy later they have to be dealt with even if it is still owned by france.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: The Italian playbook

      @AndrewAAGamer On I1 it is a good idea to take at least 1 UK territory,usually for me somewhere in east africa but maybe cyprus or malta,to deny UK their 5ipc bonus for retaining all their original territories.As well it might be benificial to let germany take SFrance G1.It gives italy a landing spot for fighters and germany has the option of building ships in the med starting G2.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: [Global 1940] Island Bombardment

      I don’t agree.An amphibious assault is a concentrated attack on a section of coastline chosen by the attacker.Naval gunfire can be directed at defending forces near the coast.An airbase can easily be far inland,and naval bases are usually well protected by shore guns and mines.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Japanese Response to KJF

      Of course you may have already done a J1 DOW and now are facing KJF.I’d keep buying land units and back up the navy close to asian ABs and NBs

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Kamikaze in Classic 3rd Edition

      So I’ve just been playing my old 98 hasbro CD game with kamakazi on.Many will recall that the CD was very glitchy,so a number of patches became available to download .I run it with a patch from A&AWC installed about 2010.Selecting the kamakazi option does NOT mean you can try to crash your planes into selected targets.lt simply allows any player to use all of their fighter movement on their combat move.100% the fighter will be lost before the end of your turn…hence the name kamakazi.It can still be lost to AA guns,or combat loss before literally running out of gas.
      On the CD software the 1st fighters to go into battle are the 1st lost.This is important to know because,after the combat is resolved and a number of fighters remain to land ,it’s best to have the ones with most movement left.To test ,on J1 I attacked India with 2 inf 1 fgt from FIC plus 1 fgt(a kami) from philipines,making sure ,using the computer mouse ,to bring the kami in 1st.Therefore when I chose a fgt as 1 of my 2 casualties,the kami died and I was left with a fgt with 3 spaces of ncm available

      posted in Axis & Allies Classic
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: [Global 1940] One rule to balance it?

      @simon33 I really like Crocketts France 1st idea.Always seems to me that it’s too easy for germany to kill szs110+111+106? as well as taking Paris.Historically,Germany needed the luftwaffe to defeat France.In early june1940 France had just replaced their top commander and was not yet at war with Italy.
      I would suggest Frances 1st turn be restricted to non-combat.For their 19ipcs ,I place a TT in sz 93 to start plus 12ipc to spend on units.Keep in mind,not being at war with Italy ,France can pass through or park in szs95,96,97.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Sealion

      There is a name,(Scotch broth or something)for this sealion method.So some drawbacks may include,
      #1 your transport fleet is vunerable in sz 111 after dropping off the 1st wave in scotland.
      #2 If allies park a surface warship in sz 112 on non-combat,you can,t load your 2nd wave .I’m assuming your troops are coming from West germ or Norway…Maybe Italian air can deal with this .
      #3 USA gets one more turn to build more units to destroy your fleet after you take london.BTW remember to take Eire from scotland .It takes away a possible landing spot.
      Good luck and watch out for the USSR.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      A
      ampdrive

    Latest posts made by ampdrive

    • RE: Advice to Renegade! What is on your top 10 for adjustments to G40 3rd edition?

      @crockett36 I hope to find your youtube video.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Advice to Renegade! What is on your top 10 for adjustments to G40 3rd edition?

      @crockett36 I really do respect Captains position that extensive playtesting is needed before widespread adoption of new ideas.I often like the concept of throwing ideas at the wall and seeing what sticks.Here are a few things about OOB set up that bug me.
      1 France falls too easily.Germany should have to use luftwaffe to be certain of taking paris G1
      2 Japan is too strong.21 starting aircraft is overwhelming.UK battleship starting in sz 37 is suppoed to represent the 2 ships Japan sunk there dec41,but of course,we are supposed to be starting 1940.J1 attack is too powerful OOB.
      3 Like I mentioned,after invasion of norway Germanys battleships were damaged.No operational Bismark and Tirpitz until 41.
      4 Agree that red amy was determined,tough and tenasious defending russia.However,as demonstated against Finland earlier in the war,they were horrible when attacking outside their borders.I say this because I don’t think the red army could easily take over eastern europe had an invasion of UK succeeded.
      5 Like in other versions of A&A,I think it should be easier(less szs across the arctic or NB in scotland)to transport units to northern russia.
      Well thats enough for now.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Advice to Renegade! What is on your top 10 for adjustments to G40 3rd edition?

      @crockett36 April 1940 Germans are invading Norway,losiing destroyersand getting their best battleships damaged(Gnieseau&scharnhorst)Granted they do sink UK carrier glorious.
      Also Italy is not in the war.Perhaps to be more historical,German cruiser should start in sz113 and a damaged battleship start in sz114.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Advice to Renegade! What is on your top 10 for adjustments to G40 3rd edition?

      @The-Janus They could take out the Italian bomber.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: [Global 1940] Blitz After Attacking With No Casualties

      @chrisbump86 Does the attacker have to declare on their combat move which territory or sz they wish to continue to if they succeed w/o taking a casualty?Can they split their forces and go to multiple territories or sz?Can they return to another friendly spot or even to where they attacked from?Would a matter if the attacker needed more than 2,3 or more combat rounds to kill the defender?
      If we playtest,these kind of questions are likely to come up.

      posted in House Rules
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: The Italian playbook

      @Marco-Luti Chasing 5 ipc bonuses is often a bad idea because you can get sucked in to poor and risky positions.Not worth it to lose your fleet or worse Rome.
      As long as you are a viable threat in the mediterrainean the allies have to spend a lot of resources for a number of rounds to deal with you.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: US Response to Successful Sea Lion

      @The-General-0 A quick US liberation of London assumes the German navy and its transports have been eliminated.Italy can throw a wrench into the allies plans as well.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: Norwegian/Finnish Facilities

      @Marco-Luti Conveniently,Russia has factories that can be "ahem"liberated in ukraine,st petersburg and volgograd.Cannon fodder volunteers can be recruited there to shield your panzers for when you want to free moscow from the bolshevics.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: The Italian playbook

      @AndrewAAGamer On I1 it is a good idea to take at least 1 UK territory,usually for me somewhere in east africa but maybe cyprus or malta,to deny UK their 5ipc bonus for retaining all their original territories.As well it might be benificial to let germany take SFrance G1.It gives italy a landing spot for fighters and germany has the option of building ships in the med starting G2.

      posted in Axis & Allies Europe 1940
      A
      ampdrive
    • RE: When going for Moscow as Germany...

      @ampdrive TY shadow.Sometimes it’s a tough bird in the cage and it’s best to keep it contained.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      A
      ampdrive