Topics created by cloud7707

@SorcererKing

Sure thing! Do you want to play via TripleA?

If we are playing 1941, I suggest that the game rules are calibrated in a specific way for the game balance’s sake. These recommendations come from an experienced A&A player.

Which scenario are we playing?
a) 1941
b) 1942

How many Victory Cities will we play to?
a) 13 cities
b) 15 cities
c) 18 cities (until concession)

Research and Development allowed?
a) Yes
b) No

National Objectives allowed?
a) Yes
b) No

Dardanelles closed to sea movement? *
a) Yes
b) No

Fighter Escorts and Interceptors allowed? *
a) Yes
b) No

*Found in the official corrections/FAQ located here: https://axisallies.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/axis-allies-rules-anniversary-corrections-faqs.pdf

With these rules, only a small bid is necessary for the Allies.

If you would like to play the game with a different ruleset, let me know.

Hey guys, I am from Stuttgart and also play Global 40 or Global War 36. We already had 3 weekends the last 2 years where we played GW36 for 3 days.
Let me know if one of you is interested. If you need more information about it, please checkout my channel plus playlist
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfjJZk6o7jYLNnspAriQWKZa__O2WjBbG&si=AiBuS2CU4xDQ___0 or checkout the list from Globalwar36 https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLVc3VorGhXmToj1T1y-yCUs_jhxRbY8X-&si=tiK_nPEfks2p6TWU

You have some interesting house rules. Thank you for the suggestion.

So guys, this Thread might get a bit convoluted, but I just wanted to inform whoever is reading this that I will do more test and maybe adjust the setup one final time… Since what bothers me so far is the unusual high number of Infantry in India that has to counter the unusual high number of Japanese transports. :D

I might do something that will reduce both the number of Infantry in India but also the amount transports (and maybe fighters) that Japan starts with. Because of this, Japan can expand in the East at will and because of all the fighters, it can both attack and defend wherever it wants to.

So stay tuned! I might create a new thread once all this tests and considerations come to a close for a final setup!

with Russia invested in China (IC in Szechwan and raised territory value to 3) and getting the IPCs, pluss the turn order allowing to consolidate, made a KJF more viable. My friend tried it one game but made a couple mistakes with positioning

@cloud7707 I dig this. I like how you added it on the real rulebook, that makes it so legit. I definitely want to try it out, but gosh darn it Russia deserves that bomber!

In your games, do the Allies still generally do KGF?

Hi black_elk, I will have a look at it today :) Sounds like the strategy I use: Build a huge fighter squadron to protect west-russia, india and china, wherever help is necessary.