Plans for a next war and/or arrogance of the powerful?

[Guest]

have a look at:

http://www.fas.org/faspir/2001/v54n1/weapons.htm

Anyone in favor for mini-nukes?

[Yanny]

The job could be done witha conventional weapons. Nukes just cause extra collateral damage.

[DeviantScripter]

Yea, you’re probably right. Unless it’s in a really deep bunker, I don’t see a need for them. We’ve got more developments such as the new MOAB, which will get the job done fine.

[ctm]

They should make mini-mini-mini-mini nukes, that you can buy for like 5 bucks a piece, and they fit in your pocket.

On the way to grandma’s and the kids are pestering you from the backseat? Heck! Just take out the mini-nukes and let them have a nuclear war with each other. Bonus! If they use enough nukes on each other and get sick, they’d lose their appetite! That’ll reduce those grocery bills.

[Guest]

D:S, even the really deep bunkers are not reachable by the mini-nukes, as they still have to get there and pierce it in the first place, so it is the “hull” of the bomb that is crucial. Read the article for more info on that.