2-if i have fighters on an aircraft carrier, can i move the carrier 2 or 3 seazones and then fly my fighters 4 movements? my friend says no but i beg to differ!!
Your friend is correct. By moving your carrier and then launching your fighters you effectively extend the range of your fighters. This rule extends to landing fighters on an aircraft carrier as well during non-combat movement. You cannot land on a carrier and then move the carrier.
I have the board game. I’m looking for the full names, for example, of the USSR territories that seem to have been abbreviated. I’m no historian so I’m not sure what some of those territory names are supposed to be.
I’d also like to get names for each of the sea zones if possible.
I’m looking at this from more of a PBEM point of view. If there is a PBEM reference somewhere, point me to it.
Does anyone know where I could get a list of full names (no abbreviations) for all the land territories and sea zones?
It is also legal to blitz an enemy-controlled (not enemy-occupied) territory and return to a friendly territory if you wish.
@Wasz:
Can you clear the water with the BB’s and then move through with your Trannies…
Any move into an enemy occupied territory or sea zone is a combat movement. For naval units, this means you have to stop in that sea zone and cannot move any units to an adjacent the sea zone.
If the enemy occupied sea zone is adjacent to the land territory you want to attack, you can also conduct an amphibious assault after the sea zone has been cleared. Check the rules for more details on amphibious assaults when you are also clearing the sea zone as things can get tricky.
@Anonymous:
Yea, ok. My point is that Apple is not the “revolutionary” company that everyone makes it out to be.
That’s because Amiga did all the work 
(Just kidding BTW–I just love platform flame wars)
Ever since Microsoft killed Netscape I’ve always believed the company was evil but I’ve come to realize they are just 100% pure amoral. The fact that our society tolerates and even celebrates the achievements of a completely amoral company does not reflect well on us.
you cant if your using the house rule that says you cant, this is considered more historicly accurate
Can you elaborate on the house rule? I’m not familiar with the historical context either. Sounds interesting…
From Hawaii, no. From New Zealand, yes.
Check out http://www.axisandallies.net/public/faqs/geography.html for all your edge-of-the-world answers.
I’m using AWeb on an Amiga 3000 running AmigaOS 3.9 so it seems I’m the only one who voted for “Other”. If you’re really curious, check out http://os.amiga.com/.
Keep your IE and Netscape… AWeb all the way!
Seriously though, stick to the W3C standards and everyone will be much happier in the long run. Customizing a web site for a particular browser misses the entire point of being on the web in the first place.
@Xi:
NO, you don’t understand.
These aircraft have one movement point to do so.
Was this line added in the A&A Game Play Manual(3rd ed.)? It is not in the 2nd ed., pp.14-15 or 24-29. I’ve never played on line just with folks I meet ans
That’s a 3rd edition rule.
The 2nd ed. rules state you can only land your aircraft on a friendly island if it is completely enclosed within the game space the fighter is currently in. Otherwise, the fighter is lost.
I always thought the original rules were a bit too complicated so I’m glad they just decided to give the fighter 1 movement point instead.