Any groups in TO looking for players?
I only get to play a couple times a year. Looking to remedy that.
Latest posts made by lukef17
-
Toronto
-
RE: Revise AA50 based on 1942 2e rules?
Iām thinking of doing this as well. For the sake of a bit of consistency in the rules between games.
And, I like the new rules, but I canāt justify purchasing this game when I already have AA50. They seem like the same level of game.
Btween the new 41, and G40
Plus AA50 gives you the option for tech and N.O.'s, as well as China and Italy.So adopting some of the new rules into AA50 seems like the best of both worlds.
-
RE: Worth it?
Iāve got 41, for quick casual games, and introducing new players.
Iāve got global for epic weekend marathonsĀ :-D.
And AA50, has served as my main game.I just canāt think of a situation where Iād play this instead of AA50.
Maybe for consistency in rules? Anti-aircraft, etc.
Iām wondering then, what the main difference are, and if I could add them to AA50 as house rules? Pick up some colour coded AA guns and whatnot.
Think itād disturb the balance too much? -
Worth it?
So I just picked up 41. Exactly the hook Iāve been looking for to get my more casual friends interested.Ā
Now I see this. 42 2nd edition.
I already have AA50. Is this worth picking up? How does it compare to AA50?
How does it compare to 1st edition? -
Quick question: multinational defense
Germany attacks a seazone containing UK and US ships.
US and germany are not at war. Does the UK defend on its own? Or does the attack constitute a declaration of war against the US?Does it make a difference if the US only has subs?
Luke
-
Tactical battleboard?
Hey everyone! More of a lurker here. I think I post about once a year on average. lol
I read in FMGās review of singapore 42, that it incorporates a ātactical battle systemā.
Anyone have any experience with this? It sounds intriguing and I was wondering if something similar could be used in A&A.
Something that wouldnāt take too much longer than dice rolling large battles.I love the tactical games, and salivate at the thought of adding that aspect to the larger strategic games.
Though you canāt really incorporate it on the map, or in the movement mechanics without breaking the game.So, the battleboard? I suppose it would be a mini-game within a game.
I realize it will make the game significantly longer. But hopefully, something reasonable can be managed. And if it adds a layer of fun to the game, who cares?Thoughts?
FMG; care to elaborate on the singapore 42 system?Luke
-
RE: Re: Field Marshal Games Pieces Project Discussion thread
If it hasnāt already been suggested; chinese infantry and artillery?
will you have Anzac and french units as well?I would like to have Chineseā¦Ā depends on cost for a small mould.
As for second point⦠Yes and Yes.
Excellent!
and judging by the previews, you can count on one more pre-order. and probably some dice too.
Luke -
RE: Re: Field Marshal Games Pieces Project Discussion thread
If it hasnāt already been suggested; chinese infantry and artillery?
will you have Anzac and french units as well? -
RE: More Homebrew stuff for AAP40
mistake on the US card?
5 IPCs for controlling iwo jima AND okinawa.
" (each) " should not be be there.Awesome btw!
Luke -
RE: Does Axis & Allies hate Canada?
No problems here in Toronto. Game shop here had it 4 days early