Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Smacktard
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 13
    • Posts 155
    • Best 0
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Smacktard

    • RE: Unheralded facts about American health care

      @Uberlager:

      @Cmdr:

      Not really looking at GDP.  China owns the United States by owning our debt.  So how can we possibly be richer than they are?

      GDP sure seems to me like an adequate measure of national wealth.  You’re also blowing our debt owned by China way out of proportion.  As of 11/08, China only owns 22% of our debt, or $682 billion.  How is 682 > 14,330???

      @Cmdr:

      Anyway, not saying our system is the best system possible, but it is better than the systems that are centrally controlled by an agency without competition. (Whether that is a government, a company or another single controlling agency)

      Define “better”.

      GDP is a good measure, but doesn’t capture the essence of the broad spectrum of problems of our economy. Jen is right, in a sense. China does not have crushing liabilities to deal with, like we do. China is not running up $400 billion trade deficits, like we have. China is not bogged down in two wars, as we are.

      If we sold every asset in this country right now, we would not have the money to meet our S.S. and Medicare/Medical obligations. China is worried about GDP SLOWING to 5%. We are already experiencing NEGATIVE 6% GDP. Just think of it this way: who has the money to buy our debt these days?

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: The Watchmen

      @Imperious:

      I boycott all movies that have to resort to using ideas from comic books for a plot.

      Its so ridiculous to me to even have movies like this unless your like 8 years old. I used to watch Ultraman and Giant Robot and Gigantor but i don’t need to have some bloke waste 200 million and make some ubermodern interpretation of a childish idea. Its like going to Dave and Busters  ( Chuck E Cheese for adults) and acting like an idiot winning those stupid yellow tickets so i can buy more Chinese finger pulls. I might as well start wearing a bib and go ga ga.

      This fails on so many levels. To be a snob is one thing. To be a snob in the capacity of a forum moderator for a gaming website devoted to a game that perhaps 1% of the population has heard of is pathetically hilarious.

      The head of my gaming group is a GS15 engineer working at Edward’s who has about 20 grand in comics. You want to see unemployed fat guys who are wasting their lives? Ever host an A&A party?  :lol:  Or been a member of a hardcore raiding guild in EQ or WOW? Or been to an MTG tournament?

      I personally can’t stand comics and Watchmen sucked (saw it last night). But hey, to each his own, right? Who am I to judge? One man’s “Watchmen” is another man’s
      “The Professional” (which was equally ridiculous, but didn’t suck).

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Ice Shelf Collapse Imminent?

      Actually, a majority of scientists believe man-made global warming is real: http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/01/19/eco.globalwarmingsurvey/index.html

      “Human-induced global warming is real, according to a recent U.S. survey based on the opinions of 3,146 scientists. However there remains divisions between climatologists and scientists from other areas of earth sciences as to the extent of human responsibility.”

      …

      "Two questions were key: Have mean global temperatures risen compared to pre-1800s levels, and has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures?

      About 90 percent of the scientists agreed with the first question and 82 percent the second.  The strongest consensus on the causes of global warming came from climatologists who are active in climate research, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role.

      Petroleum geologists and meteorologists were among the biggest doubters, with only 47 percent and 64 percent, respectively, believing in human involvement."

      The only group that was not a majority were petroleum geologists, who do not study climate or the weather.

      The kindest thing that could be said against man-made global warming is that our climate models are not accurate enough to pinpoint the cause. Maybe it’s a purely natural phenemenon. Even assuming that to be true, it doesn’t follow that we should do nothing. If it IS a purely natural phenemenon, and we reduce pollution, the worst that could be said is we sacrificed some worldwide GDP to make the world a cleaner place. If it is MAN-MADE, and we do nothing, the worst that could be said is we failed to prevent a potentially catastrophic change in climate. Do we really want to gamble with something as all-encompassing as the climate of the Earth? Are a few percentage points of GDP really that important?

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • How's Everyone Doing?

      DOW dropped below 8,000 for the first time in five years. It has a negative growth rate over 10 years, and has only doubled in the last 15 (was at 3500 in 1993). I’ve lost about ten grand in the market over the last two months, but am in a pension plan so it’s not life or death for me. How’s everyone else doing?

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: A standing of a great man

      @Imperious:

      I removed some offending posts recently posted.

      Smacktard: i notice a pattern which i can now confirm… you only show up to retort Jennifer and attempt to get into fisticuffs out of some need to dominate whatever view she has. It leads to contentiousness and we cant have any of that.

      I have no idea why you decide to ONLY show up when she posts, but your tone needs to stop.

      Too bad you missed the thread right next to this where I AGREE with Jen (there should have been a woman on the poll) and argue against Frimmel’s idea that women don’t have it that rough.

      his thread was just about the communication skills of our new president. Its not about how your rhetoric can overcome another.

      Actually, it’s about the communication skills of the guy who DIDN’T win (Mccain). I wrote a whole paragraph complimenting those skills, the graciousness of Bush during the transition phase, and expressing my sympathy for Obama and all the problems confronting him.

      Somehow it got erased.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Odd question?

      @frimmel:

      You know I found a woman in congress to.

      LOL! Was she hiding under a rock? There are actually 68 in the House and 14 in the Senate. Which is good because women are 15% of the population  :roll:

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: How and Why America became great

      @Cmdr:

      You are quite correct in your literal interpretation of the US Constitution.  But let us remember that the US Constitution was not imposed before, during or immediately after the American Revolution but at least a decade later.

      Anyway, I believe almost unilaterally most, if not all, of the authors of our freedom, from the layman with his rifle hiding in a muddy puddle along the road to shoot at red coats, all the way up to the lofty dignitaries like Thomas Jefferson would state, very emphatically, that taxation is a method to raise money in times of very dire need, not an existence that should be experienced on a daily basis as the “norm.”

      We also weren’t trusted to vote for president back then. Times change. If you want to spend $12 billion a month on war, you gotta pay for it. Ditto for Homeland Security, FBI, CIA, the interstate highway system, trips to the moon, national parks, etc.

      As I said, we’ve had a progressive income tax in place for over 90 years (and no, “progressive income tax” is not political- the two major parties in this country are, and have  been, perfectly content to keep it in place), and it certainly hasn’t stood in the way of our progression to superpower.

      Correction: progressive income taxation started during the Civil War:

      “During the Civil War, a person earning from $600 to $10,000 per year paid tax at the rate of 3%. Those with incomes of more than $10,000 paid taxes at a higher rate.”

      http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005921.html

      So it’s been in place for the last 145 years.

      The reason I feel comfortable saying this is because of how loathe all the important men in American history have been to implement any form of tax throughout our early history.  This is not to make an argument that taxes are good or bad, but rather an argument to state that at the time this nation was building the foundation of itself that made us great, taxes were viewed upon with great distaste and, at times, hostile resistance.

      So were foreign entanglements. Is there a single successful industriliazed democratic nation without an income tax? I honestly don’t know. I know the norm is income taxation.

      So it seems plainly obvious that taxes, levied on any portion or the whole of the people, were not the cause of us becoming a great nation, but rather, despite the very short periods of time taxes were levied on the people, we grew to greatness anyway.

      Uh huh. So 140 years is a “very short period of time”? Riiight.  :roll:

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: How and Why America became great

      I think it should be pointed out that for the last 90 years or so, while America emerged as a superpower (and has retained that status for decades), we’ve had progressive income taxation. Some might even call it… wealth redistribution :-o

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Margin Call on America

      @Cmdr:

      Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois.

      $90.00 Per Week Maximum 4 Weeks per month (so really 48 weeks = $4,320)

      100% Dental Covered
      100% Vision Covered
      100% Generic Prescriptions Covered
      $5/CoPay Name Brand Prescriptions Covered.

      This is NOT company sponsored, it is DIRECT FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANY.  You will, of course, have to use a quoting service.  Of course, to make his point, Smacktard specifically did NOT use services such as ican.com and the literally hundreds of other quoting services out there.

      What happens is the quoting service groups you with others like you and then goes to the insurance company and negotiates a rate based on your demographics.  So my $90/week for 48 weeks a year was probably offered to a million other people just like me.

      BTW, there are no deductibles to deal with.  You can ask for plans with them, but I chose not to get them and to pay the like three dollars a week difference.

      I know Blue Cross does this, Metlife does it and so does United Health Care (UHC).  I’m sure there are others, and they may even be cheaper.

      The point is, we do not need to “fix” health care insurance in this country.  We already have the best possible health care insurance in the world.  What we need to do is fix the tax situation on health care insurance.  I have to pay taxes on the money I earn that pays for health care because it is not company provided.  Others who use company provided insurance get to pay for their insurance out of their net and pay taxes on what is left after paying for it.  If we just allowed all health insurance payments to be tax exempt, no one would need company provided health care insurance which would make it easier to transition from one employer to another. (Since you won’t have to wait the pre-requisite 9 months or whatever it is to get your preexisting conditions covered.  Since you won’t change providers or policies, then there would be no waiting period!)

      Now, add to that the FACT you can go to the emergency room FOR FREE for any injury or illness, without regard to your citizenship status for FREE medical treatment and you have to wonder - where’s the crisis???


      Now, back on topic, when will the government learn they have to SHUT UP.  Everytime they open their mouths the DOW drops 200 points.  Everytime they pass a law the DOW drops 600 points!  This is the worst legislative administration in American history and it is destroying the international economy!

      We need to get Chris Dodd, Barney Franks, anyone even remotely related to A.C.O.R.N. and all the other crooks that stopped the reform of the housing industry in 2003 and put them in jail!

      Aren’t you a teacher? I’ve never heard of a public school teacher having to shop around for health insurance. Are you telling us you weren’t automatically enrolled in a group plan when you were hired? I know Chicago teachers have a choice of PPO or HMO coverage: http://www.cps-humanresources.org/Careers/benefits.htm

      So what is this bass-ackwards district you work at that doesn’t provide health care to its members?

      Oh, and emergency room care isn’t free. You WILL get a bill from the hospital. Whether you can pay it or not is an entirely different thing. Maybe you’re confusing “will not turn away due to lack of money” with “free”.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Margin Call on America

      @Cmdr:

      Most of America already pays for $5k or more for corporate provided healthcare.  The difference is that giving everyone a pre-bate check for $5k could result in many Americans continuing to CHOSE not to have health care insurance instead investing that money into emergency medical bonds (an option currently available, you just put the money into a bond at your local bank, it pays 5.25% +/- depending on what CD Rates are for 5 year term CDs and if you have a medical emergency, you can draw off it without penalty.)  Others can CHOOSE to get coverage like mine from Blue Cross/Blue Shield which covers 100% of medical, dental and optical with a very small copay on NAME BRAND drugs (generics are free.  Basically, this is Germany’s plan, but instead of the government taxing us for it, I bought it from a private company and can leave when I want and go to a competitor.)

      Also, schools are funded through property taxes, not income taxes, so diverting the funds for health care from your paycheck just like they are deducted now will have zero impact on school funding.

      Also, I would like to state that Michael Moore movies are fictional pieces.  Sicko is not an accurate depiction of healthcare in America where you can get the flu, go to the emergency room, and be seen by a physician for free at any hospital in the nation, with or without health care.

      Where are you getting your Blue Cross coverage? I have Blue Cross, and my generics are $8 each.

      This seems to hard to believe:

      I pay $4,320 a year for full health, dental and vision coverage for my two children, husband and myself.

      Full coverage for a generic family of four (Male, female, aged 30, no preexisting conditions; 2 kids, age 10, no preexisting conditions) is $758 a month. https://services.hscil.com/il/eapp/wxpm1653.pl?source=WEBIL00100

      Edit: You’ll have to generate your own family for the link to give you a quote.

      That plan also has an $1100 individual deductible ($2200 family).

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Margin Call on America

      @Cmdr:

      Well, for one, I think the public promises need to be realized for what they are: false promises.  If they were terminated immediately, many of the budget problems would also terminate.  Perhaps the fire sale of American financial institutions would also stop.

      What false promises?

      However, that said, I have to say that for over a decade now I have been lamenting the fact that American realestate was way over priced.  I believe it is the unrealistic pricing of American realestate that is the culprit of the fire sale, not the deficit or any of the other factors being listed.

      A decade ago, it was a buyer’s market. In 2000, I bought my house in Southern California for $86 a square foot- a steal.  Homes have always been expensive in New York, San Francisco, Monteray, Santa Barbra, etc.

      In 1998, the Median Price for a San Diego home was $195,000. That’s doable on $50,000 a year (close to median income back then), with a 10% down payment. In 2003, the median price had jumped to $420,000. In 2004, it was $525,000. The bubble didn’t start until around 2001.

      http://www.signonsandiego.com/sdhomes/area_homesales/pastyears-2000.php

      Another method of reducing the deficit would be to retail our energy reserves.  The United States of America (and Canada) holds almost a third of the world’s coal reserves and almost 15% of the world’s oil reserves (Colorado alone has more oil than all of Saudi Arabia) and, adding Canada to the mix, that number is even higher.

      If we were to cash in on the unrealistic prices of oil right now, I wager the United States could easily see a negative deficit in a matter of a few short years.

      We should definitely become an oil exporting nation again. But it would mean putting a floor tax on gasoline ($3 or $4 a gallon) to create demand. Nobody wanted an electric, CNG, or fuel cell car when gas was $1.50.

      As for the value of the American currency, it will remain strong.  It may not be uber right now, but it is strong.  That’s because the value of American holdings, resources and institutions back up the currency.  People know that the US Dollar is worth one US Dollar and that it will be worth one US Dollar tomorrow and the day after and the day after that for as long as one can speculate life will exist barring any serious acts of god(s).

      The dollar is worth whatever investors think its worth. If America starts to look like a bad investment, investors start cashing in their dollars for other currencies or hard commodities. It’s our luck that Britain, Germany, and Japan are having their own tough times, so the dollar looks relatively good stacked up against those currencies.

      I must admit that the current financial buyout packages (both passed and proposed) worry me greatly.  I, for one, would have been much happier had AIG, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gone out of business, liquidated their assets and let smarter men and women take control of those assets and fix the problems.

      Fannie and Freddie hold over five TRILLION in mortgage securities. Letting them go under was unthinkable. They had reached TBTF status (too big to fail). But I would love to read an economist’s paper suggesting they should have gone under…

      What has the solution been recently?  Give them their golden parachutes and bail the company out with public money.  What’s my idea of a solution?  Put them in bankruptcy, sell all their assets to other companies, let their stocks dry up and cinch your belt for a while until you can recover.  Why won’t it happen?  Americans are cry babies.  They gambled, they lost, now they want “Mommy and Daddy” to come bail them out.

      That’s true to some extent, but another problem is a failure of the market itself to fix a price on all these bundles of mortgage securities. When the govt. approves the bailout (which they will), there’s a chance (probably small) that some of these mortgage securities are seriously UNDERvalued, and we could actually make a profit on them if housing goes up.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Palin

      ::grabs popcorn::
      Nothing like a little premarital underage sex to spice up an election! McCain must be hoping this story sinks faster than a New Orlean’s levee.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Palin

      @ncscswitch:

      She has the look of someone playing the Teacher roll in a low-budget ‘Adult’ version of Van Halen’s “Hot for Teacher”…  the hair pulled up, the glasses, the opening of her jacket framing her pectoral features…

      Other than that, not much to discuss.

      I thought she looked familiar…

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Palin

      @Cmdr:

      Yea, can’t talk about her political views, but that’s not really stopping Switch now is it?

      /sigh.

      Anyway, there’s much to like about Sarah.

      1)  She’s union

      Haven’t you railed against unions before? Can’t swear to it though.

      2)  She’s a fisherman’s wife

      And…? Is there something inherently good about fishermen?

      3)  She’s the mother of 5

      Again, And…? How does the amount of kids you have have any bearing on the type of person you are? Jimmy Carter had 4 kids. Bush has 2. Carter > Bush?

      4)  One of her children has down syndrome

      Again, And…? Are people with disabled children more likeable than the rest of us?

      5)  She’s the mother of a veteran, soon to be war veteran

      Props to the kid for volunteering. Don’t know how that impacts mom, one way or another.

      6)  She’s a member of the PTA

      Good for her.

      7)  She’s commander in chief of the Alaskan National Guard

      Bill Clinton was CIC of the Arkansas National Guard. For more than 1.8 years, I might add. Props to Bill?

      8)  She’s a self made woman who comes from lower class backgrounds and made herself what she is today

      Lower class? Father was a teacher and mother was a secretary. Don’t know how you define “lower class”. Average teacher pay these days is $47,000. That + secretary income puts you well above median income ($50,000).

      1. She graduated from the University of Idaho in 1987 instead of some ivy league indoctrination university like many other influential people have.

      Uh huh. So if she had a BA from a degree-mill (think Univerity of Phoenix), that would make her MORE qualified? Intersting logic. Do you think top law firms pick graduates from Harvard Law School because they’re more “indoctrinated”?

      1. She likes to have sex with men, presumably, since she had to have sex with at least one guy 5 times to get 5 kids with significantly different birthdays!

      Strangely enough, this is true of Hillary Clinton.

      Dunno, seems to me she’s a real, down home, blue collar, “bitter clinger” representative of John and Jane Smith American.  In other words, she’s Misses America.

      She’s also under investigation for ethics violation by an independent prosecutor appointed by the Alaska Republican legislative council. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=atTPk3ULEWeQ&refer=home

      How many blue collar folks find themselves under investigation for abuses of power? I’m thinking not that many  :lol:

      Edit: Ah, before I forget: she’s against abortion in cases of rape or incest. That ought to endear her to about 20% of the population. http://pollingreport.com/abortion.htm
      She’s also opposed to stem cell research (again, with the support of less than 20% of the population).

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • Palin

      It would be almost criminal for a forum to NOT talk about the ex-beauty queen VP candidate. Please???

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Sexism Rears its Ugly Head

      @frimmel:

      What wage gap?

      Women’s work-life patterns and their occupational preferences are significant factors in determining wages. Rather than being “funneled” into low-wage, low-prestige and part-time positions, women often choose these occupations because of the flexibility they offer. After adjusting for these factors, scholars find that the difference between men’s and women’s earnings is very narrow.

      Those who still cite women’s 76 cents for every male dollar as evidence of sexism fail to take into account the underlying role of personal choice. The “wage gap” is not so much about employers discriminating against women as about women making discriminating choices in the labor market.

      Oh, I’m sure a lot of that is true. But even your article admits to a wage gap, all things being equal:

      “Women who hold positions and have skills and experience similar to those of men face wage disparities of less than 10 percent, and many are within a couple of points.”

      And then we look at the top jobs in corporate America. Do you really think the choice to have kids or stay at home accounts for half the population making up less than 3% of the top jobs in this country? How about black men? Are they having kids too? I couldn’t find a single black or hispanic woman running a Fortune 1000 company. So that’s 13% of the population being represented in 0% of the top jobs.

      Of course there’s a good ol boy club. How else do you account for 38% of the population (white males) taking 95%+ of the top jobs? It’s the same story in the top levels of govt.

      Why do men make up over 90% of workplace fatalities?

      You tell me. Do you think there’s some men’s only factory where all the dangerous jobs are? I think the answer is pretty obvious: either by choice or hiring practices, women aren’t working in dangerous fields.

      Oh, and on this chart here:
      http://stats.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cftb0220.pdf

      Whites make up 77% of the population, but only 69% of workplace fatalities. If you’re a white man in this country, and you’re not succeeding, there’s probably something wrong with you.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Sexism Rears its Ugly Head

      @frimmel:

      When there is equity in workplace fatalities women will have a point that the ‘men at work’ signs should be ‘workers ahead.’ Until the pampered and safe ladies get a taste of the ‘dirt floor’ I’ll have little patience for their talk of a ‘glass ceiling’ and ‘subtle discrimination.’

      That’s 92.3% of workplace fatalities happening to men. And 68.8% to WHITE men.

      Everybody easily sees the sexism women are subjected to but are mostly blind to the sexism men are subjected to. How many government offices would exist to correct the disparagement in workplace fatalities were the incidents primarily happening to females?

      Interesting stats. Probably due to men still being employed overwhelmingly in dangerous industries (and making $9,000 more per year than female workers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male-female_income_disparity_in_the_United_States))

      We can take heart, though. There are only 24 women CEO’s in the top Fortune 1000 companies. What is that? 50% of the population being represented in 2.4% of the top jobs? http://thepanelist.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=262&Itemid=10053

      There are only 4 black CEO’s running companies in the Fortune 500. Less than 1% for a group comprising 12% of the population.

      Lord, here the lamentations of us white men!! When will OUR day come? We SHALL overcome!

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Sexism Rears its Ugly Head

      @Cmdr:

      To me sexism is when a man is given something just because he is male at the expense of a female who was also qualified or more qualified to get whatever it was.

      A sign that says Men Working is not sexist.

      A man who is promoted to manager because he goes to the strip clubs with the boss after work each night and the woman of the team is not even invited to go, is sexist. (Assuming both were equally qualified for the job.)

      A woman who is given an award when a man did the activity better, but was dinged to “level the playing field” is sexist.  Men and women are equal, the playing field is equal.

      Bonus points based on gender, race, religion, creed, political affiliation, sexual orientation, whatever is an -ist in my book.  But for the love of Cheetos!  A construction sign that’s probably been around twice as long as she was alive is sexist because it says Men at Work or whatever?  Give me a break!  I’m sure there’s plenty of sexism on construction sites like forcing women to hold the yield signs or not letting them drive the concrete trucks or whatever, but if the worst thing in life is that the sign says hu-“Men at Work” or whatever, get a bloody life!

      How is any of that relevant to a city adopting gender-neutral road signs?

      Edit: I see. The women who oppose the signs think they’re sexist. They’re probably not (the signs, not the women), but a gender neutral sign is probably more appropriate when both sexes are employed. Think of it this way: You’re running a road crew and you’ve got men and women working. You have to order a caution sign. Why would you order “Men at work”, which only covers one group of employees, when there is a perfectly suitable sign (“Workers Ahead”) that covers everyone?

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Sexism Rears its Ugly Head

      it’s only sexism if one gender is being given preferential treatment. Replacing “Men at Work” with “Workers Ahead” (which is what Atlanta is doing) sends the same message and is gender neutral. The OPPOSITE of sexism.

      Now, it might be a waste of time, but maybe there are women workers who would like a sign at work to actually acknowledge their presence. This is not an unreasonable request, to me. Sort of like if the company you’re working for omits your name in the company directory. I can see someone wanting a little acknowledgement for the job they do.

      Here are some rules for teachers back in 1915:

      "1. You will not marry during the term of your contract.

      2. You are not to keep company with men.

      3. You must be home between the hours of 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. unless attending a school function.

      4. You may not loiter downtown in ice cream stores.

      5. You may not travel beyond city limits unless you have the permission of the chairman of the board.

      6. You may not ride in a carriage or automobile with any man unless he is your father or brother.

      7. You may not smoke cigarettes.

      8. You may not dress in bright colors.

      9. You may under no circumstances dye your hair.

      10. You must wear at least two petticoats.

      11. Your dresses must not be any shorter than two inches above the ankle."

      http://www.wral.com/golo/blogpost/3243549/

      There was probably a similar outcry when someone suggested those rules be changed.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • RE: Frazzin Media

      You’re actually denying this? ROFL!

      So, let’s see…. On July 30th, you and Rob Long both have the exact same experience of a news van blocking your driveway. You also both write it down in nearly identical language (one part you actually copied and pasted entirely):

      @Cmdr:

      " “We’re media.” As if that settled that, and she went back to primping and primming for the camera."

      “We’re media,” she said, as if that settled that, and went back to her powdering and primping."

      http://www.kcrw.com/etc/programs/ma/ma080730paparazzi

      @Cmdr:

      “It’s okay, We’re the media.”

      “It’s okay. We’re media.”

      http://www.kcrw.com/etc/programs/ma/ma080730paparazzi

      *** If you’ll notice, even the italics are identical (have to clink on the link to see italics)

      @Cmdr:

      “We’re a new organization, ma’am.  We’re the press.  We can park where we want.”

      “We’re a news organization, sir. We’re press. We can park where we want.”

      http://www.kcrw.com/etc/programs/ma/ma080730paparazzi

      This is a straight copy-and-paste. You didn’t even try to disguise it.
      Edit: Ah, not exactly a straight copy-and-paste. You switched “ma’am” with “sir”.

      As if that weren’t enough, you also edited your “account” this morning and removed a whole line of dialogue: “…there’s a chance I may need to step out for some ice.”

      Don’t you have a history of doing this sort of thing? You would have been better off passing the whole thing off as a joke.

      posted in General Discussion
      SmacktardS
      Smacktard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 1 / 8