Navigation

    Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    1. Home
    2. miamibeach
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 3
    • Posts 135
    • Best 0
    • Groups 0

    miamibeach

    @miamibeach

    0
    Reputation
    23
    Profile views
    135
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Age 22

    miamibeach Unfollow Follow

    Latest posts made by miamibeach

    • RE: Three rules questions…

      Thank you guys!  The rules lawyers in our group had the first two wrong!

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • Three rules questions…

      Sorry if this has been already covered on this forum, but I did’nt see it anywhere.
      1.  Can the USA aquire the pro-Allied neutral Brazil when the USA is still neutral itself?
      2.  Does USSR get 5 IPC’s for no Axis sub in SZ125(either when its neutral or not?).
      3.  When French territories are taken by the Axis and then later liberated by an ally, does that territory produce IPC’s for the liberating country or revert to French control?
      Thanks!

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: Malta

      Thanks!  Cool site!

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: Malta

      What’s your avatar about?…I cant really see it.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: Italy a bad design

      As the Germans I would prefer to take care of the UK fleet in the north on G1…rebase all possible air to W. Germany.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: An Easy Italian Fix

      @BJCard:

      Yes, but is it worse for Italy to rule the med with 2 Transports from turn 1?  I think you lose Cairo pretty fast- and thus lose Africa- killing UK’s income (and hence fleet making abilities).

      Italy should take Egypt anyway.  Our game did’nt get that far.  I had only 1 TRS(took Transjordan), but the UK had to evacuate Egypt or lose everything there on I2.  I would rally all UK remaining ships probably off the coast of S. Africa(IC to add stuff to the fleet), bring the CA, TRS in the Med south, the CA off the coast of S. America, DD already at S. Africa…any UK naval units from the Pacific…that would be: 1CV(FTR/TAC), 2CA’s, 2DD’s, 1TRS, plus Pacific side assets that I wont list since that depends on Japan…then add what would probably be 2+ SUBs and 1 or 2 more TRS…now you have a task force and can go where you want without much fear.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: An Easy Italian Fix

      @BJCard:

      The british should do the Italian raid every game, and NCM the carrier to the french fleet.  Most of the time the UK will with with 1 tac, 1 ftr to land on the carrier.  If the germans want to attack 1 DD, 1 CA, 1 CV, 1 Tac, 1 Ftr with air, than so be it- they will lose 2-3 aircraft in the first round, with another 1-2 in the second round (depending on how many hits the germans get).  If the German airforce is depleted that much, then subsequent UK builds are much safer.

      Of course if the Germans build 1 CV, 2 Transports round 1, then the Tac will be needed in the defense of Great Britain…

      Last week several of us here played out that scenario and it ended badly for the Allies.  Its worth it for Germany to lose 2-3 aircraft to help the Italians clear the Med.  Depending on the first round die rolls, the Germans need not finish the job, they can leave that to the Italians who have 1CA, 1DD, 2FTR’s to mop up.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: An Easy Italian Fix

      @Striker:

      It appears the Italy fleet raid was intended.

      From Larry’s forums: http://www.harrisgamedesign.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2537&start=8
      @Striker:

      I’ll be interested in hearing a reply from Larry or a playtester that says either “Yes, we intended that to be a possible opening move for Britain, duh.” or “Woops, we might have made and oversight there.”

      @Krieghund:

      Yes, we intended that to be a possible opening move for Britain, duh.

      The key words here are “intended”, which is what you choose to use; the other is “possible”, which is what Krieghund used.  I think this game was very well playtested(other than AAP40 aircraft that can effect the Euro side).  The play testers made all sorts of things “possible” to give players many interesting things to think about.  I think the UK spending its naval assets like that in the Med is a foolish move…they dont have much in the way of navy after G1 and do not have many IPC’s to re-build a serious task force…as well, they have non-navel demands on their IPC’s.  Dont do it, its a trap!

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: Malta

      1FTR by itself on Malta should not be a reason to divert a planned attack on Egypt so long as Italy has surface combat ships to protect its TRS(s).  I think there are other places more effective for the UK to put that FTR.  That 1 FTR is 1/3 or more of UK production.  I dont think Malta is that useful.  What would make it more useful is if no AB could be built on Sardinia or Sicily…making Malta important for fleet defense.

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach
    • RE: Imperious leader’s best moves for AAE40/ AAG40:

      I disagree with a few things, but I want to comment mainly that Italy should be given as much of the Balkans as possible…let Italy align Bulgaria, no reason to give this to Germany.  The economic benefit(incl 4INF) to Italy is much greater percentage-wise, and helps Italy take down Greece for another NO(assuming they take Egypt).  I would even let Italy take Yugo the first real chance they can manage it…I2?

      posted in Axis & Allies Global 1940
      miamibeach
      miamibeach