Navigation

    Axis & Allies .org Forums
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Home
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    1. Home
    2. insaneHoshi
    I
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 7
    • Posts 284
    • Best 83
    • Groups 0

    insaneHoshi

    @insaneHoshi

    100
    Reputation
    32
    Profile views
    284
    Posts
    1
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined Last Online
    Age 22

    insaneHoshi Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by insaneHoshi

    • RE: Another dimension - Defender Retreats

      I think if you did wish to have such a rule, the simplest way to have it work is at the beginning of any follow up combat round, any defending unit may forgo any attacks and elect to retreat; they will still suffer attacks and casualties for that final round. During non-combat they then move to an adjacent friendly territory, if there are none, they are eliminated.

      This makes it so that retreating isn’t free; there has to be some downside to it.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Does the Global War 1936-1945 board game (third edition) actually exist? How can I buy one?

      Unlike traditional board games, GW36 doesnt come as a self contained set. It comes with just the map, and then you have to assemble the playing pieces yourself, which is recommended by cannibalizing Global40 and building the new GW36 units buy makeing further purchases from HBG, Iwillnevergrowup, shapeways etc.

      Here is a link to their “top level” of global war 36: https://www.historicalboardgaming.com/Global-War-1936v3_c_1293.html

      Have you looked at any youtube guides on how to build the game, they explain it better than i do.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Airbase needed for interception? V3

      I think the rule should be interpreted as, fighters can always scramble to their territory they are in, but need an undamaged airbase to scramble to adjacent territories.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Tech problems

      @vondox said in Tech problems:

      @aldrahill Yes, our german player was very lucky in our last game

      There is lucky and there is a player getting 52/54 rolls which has a chance of 00.0000000000082% occurring.

      You guys were probably doing something wrong, and if you weren’t, you shouldn’t be trying to balance it around an exceptional set of luck.

      There is nothing in the rules that state you are allowed to switch to a new tech line

      The part of the rulebook that says “For each tech roll, select a tech and roll…” (paraphrasing) lack of conditions regarding switching, says you are allowed to switch.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Airborne and fortifications?

      @linkler Yeah, it gives the airborne the option to avoid the fort if the transport has long enough range, which makes sense and is good for gameplay.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Carriers vs Islands in Pacific?

      @hms-serapis If you are island hoping, you cant defend your fleet with aircraft.

      Also I do not see how you are able to attack islands with aircraft without carriers to land on. An aircraft from Hawaii, could not reach any islands japan may take (save one)

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: The FAQ Thread

      What happens if Aircraft Scramble to an adjacent zone, and their starting zone is captured?

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Chinese bug(not Covid)

      @panzerbaguette UK can declare war on a minor nation at any point.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: German Possesses Iraq? Never gonna happen right?

      While we are on the subject, the rule book state that if there is a german or italian unit in an adj. zone, iraq joins at the end of turn.

      I image this is supposed to be interpreted as if there is a german/italian unit present at end of turn? Like Germany cant land a unit in a contested zone, and then say “well i have a unit adjacent, they now align”

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: The FAQ Thread

      When cant the M-R Pact be signed. Say USSR has taken romania and finland and Germany has taken all of poland. Can the pact still be signed?

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi

    Latest posts made by insaneHoshi

    • RE: Rule Entry for flying over neutrals

      @vowly said in Rule Entry for flying over neutrals:

      Does this count for non combat moves of only combat moves?

      Logic dictates that “Fly over” applies to combat and non-combat movement.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Join the ABGB discord: Much more GW36 activity is found there.

      https://discord.gg/2EkjrEK4

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Join the ABGB discord: Much more GW36 activity is found there.

      @vowly https://discord.gg/pjpC6PHR

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Join the ABGB discord: Much more GW36 activity is found there.

      https://discord.gg/Ax5sG8Q6

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: surfacing your submarines (V4)

      I think there is a statement somewhere that says “If a submarine submerges, it remains as such for the remainder of the player turn”

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Amphibious Assault

      @timothy-gengarella Yes, an infantry unit is needed.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Air Bases

      @timothy-gengarella said in Air Bases:

      ff in a land zone that does not have a airbase but land in a territory that has a airbase do you still get the bonus movement?

      Youll get the movement bonus next turn.

      You dont get extra movement to reach a base.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: Join the ABGB discord: Much more GW36 activity is found there.

      FYI, the link should only last a week so so, so if the link doesnt work, reply to this thread and ask for a new one.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: USA income determined actions 50 ipp

      @kmtnt If italy moves to the middle of the Atlantic on the second to last turn, the USA just builds some 8 tanks, some bombers and fighters, and they’ll be able to take back whatever the Italians take; The end result of this is Italy’s Atlantic venture, which probably has taken a whole game to build up, is now countered by the USA doing a big tank buy at the stage of the game where its buys do not matter (as whatever that is bought on the penultimate US turn isnt affecting the game)

      Furthermore, no matter how much Italy can bring to the table, the USA can respond much better to take Italy after Italy blows their load.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi
    • RE: USA income determined actions 50 ipp

      @captainnapalm However, if FF hold any continental French territory, that counts as their home territory so you could LL there.

      posted in Global War 1936
      I
      insaneHoshi