I’d say the destroyer.

@Jermofoot:

An Axis & Allies game that combined the overworld map that we know and then a tactical grid/hex that worked like the miniatures for battles would be awesome.

Now that would make an already awsome game even better.  Beacause you would have even more control over the battles.

If they do go away from money I’ll be mad but I’ll just use the money from other games.   Although it ticks me off that they do that.

@allboxcars:

But makes you wonder if Hasbro just decided that kids couldn’t do the math unaided.

If we have gotten to that point then its pretty sad.

Another Panzer divison WITH A GOOD SUPPLY LINE!!  Thats what killed Rommel was lack of supplies.

US needs to land with one transport and some destroy cover 1 inf and 1 tank as many times as possible in Africa every turn and then turn all attention to Pacific.  Russia could also save China by sending 4-5 tanks into china to put a lid on Japan.

Sence I got AAA50 I always play with crusiers even when I go back to AAE and AAP it just makes it better.
Although I agree that destroys price tag should be increased.

Has anyone heard of it?  It looks like fun beacause there will be actual stratagy instead of every man for himself.  I can’t wait to get a PS3 so I can get it.

Just wondering and please explain.

Personally I like it for the stratagy and the screams and yells when rolling the dice for a major battle.  Its also just plain old FUN!!!

Some parts of it would have to be dark and creepy.  Cuz its Edgar Allen Poe!

The thing I like about search and destroy is its realistic.  And you get tons of experice for each kill.  (shot down a Pavelow and got 4,000 experice!!!)

@Jermofoot:

Got 2 AC-130s in one life heheheh.

Now thats evil.  My friend once got one from a care packege during search and destroy.  Needless to say his team won.