……it explains itself n’est pas? :oops:
Latest posts made by The Trooper
no , sorry i worded that wrong, i meant other Non-Heavy AIRCRAFT got +1 on the dice, not all units. but i suppose your right, bombers should also have higher defense, but i also forgot to mention that the bombs should be alimited ability like AP rounds, or roket salvo.
but superior armor on a bomber? i dunno, maybe but if so 6/6 is kinda high then, cause other planes and AA guns usually roll like nine dice, but then again, Bombers would be a priority target… But the innacurate would make it virtually useless in defending itslef against other aircraft, and plus, it souldnt have such high normal AT cause if you think about it all thoes machine guns in the turrets arent really gonnna do much to say a panzer 4, but your right about having higher AI dice cause all thoes machineguns would be a living nightmare against infantry. :evil:
also the bomb ablility would kinda ignore cover and hit everthing in a hex so blast and bombrdment wouldnt be nesscessarry i think.
Has anyone ever thought about bringing bombers to the field?
i did, and heres how i think they could work:
they are placed on the field like aircraft, and have AT and AI attacks like aircraft, BUT heres the biggie, inseatd of the “aircraft” ability, its “Heavy aircraft” wich gives other non Heavy aircraft +1 on dice rolls (not stacked with Anti Air), and the bombers ability could be say Bombs 10 wich could be an attack used to hit everything underneath and in front of the bomber, but would alsa have the blast and bombardment abilities kinda built into it.
i think that only being able to attack underneath and infront(like a one way strafe) would allow the other player to mount a good defense against this otherwise pretty powerful attack.
one bomber stat idea
Lancaster bomber 19 pts.
Heavy aircraft(explained above)
Bombs 10(also explained abouve)
Well anyone who has an oppinion tell me what you think.
RE: Unit stats
I didnt make em up
the russian DP gun was basically the same as the bar gun, only with an higher rate of fire,
as for the death’s head SSthey were the SS fanatical leigeons usually assigned to do the dirty work of exterminating jewish refugee camps. i could go on, but yeah.
RE: The new set
i hope they come out with the Su-152 Aka “the counquering beast”
another thing that would be kewlwould be the me163E “Komet” the war’s only rocket-propelled fighter like 20 points 7/6/0, and like3/2/0, with “extreme speed only like 6es count” but its also got "highly volatile: if this unit gets a disruped counter destroy it immediately"and it would have like 3/3 defense.
But what they should defietly have is a kamikazie Zero.
RE: Stupid Veteran Tiger!!!
ok i tried that unit combination, it worked like a charm on a battle where we had an objective, but when we played a full on kill all battle i ALMOST won, but he managed to take out my pershing as i was moving in for the kill(i had his tank damaged by then)
but it would have worked better if i had screaming eagles instead of the Defiant ones, but hell i almost won
RE: The new set
Yea i agree with you there, the Yak would be sweet, and the lack of russian units in D-day pissed me off. But the nebelwefer would be freaking sweet, like a towable katyusha , thier stats would probably be pretty similar too.
and a grease gunner with crack shot? have you lost all faith in the game makers?
And the A-Bomb would suck nuts, like what roll a million dice against everything on the feild? it just wouldnt add anything positive to the game.
Chuck norris? that would be pretty damn funny, but i dont think Chuck is THAT old.
but if anything i hope that they come you with more russian infanrty, like some infantry that have a DECENT close assault.
(ps: nice reference to southpark)